wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

Analysis: Green Bay Packers rookie T Derek Sherrod looks too green to be a starter 



The Packers came into camp excited about first-round draft pick Derek Sherrod possibly starting this year, but after watching their preseason opener Saturday night at Cleveland, I’m not so sure they should be, not as a starter right away.

Sherrod is a natural left tackle playing left guard, and he has a lot of work to do to be a starter in the NFL. I don’t think he finishes well. He sometimes stays on blocks for a little bit, but he doesn’t block until the whistle. He has the ability to get out to linebackers in the run game, and he has the size and reach and body type to do it, but he just didn’t finish blocks against the Browns. He also needs to play with lower pad level and use his hands better, be under control with his hands.

Even in pass blocking he didn’t finish and allowed some pressure. This is the easiest thing for him to correct right now, finish his blocks. They’ll go to the tape and tell him, ‘You can block longer than you have been.’ That part I think will be OK.
EDIT

Packernews.com wrote:


UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
His arms are too short, cut him.
UserPostedImage
PackerTraxx
13 years ago
With the lockout and being a rookie I would be surprised to see Sherrod play, especially early, unless pushed into action. But I think he is getting valuable reps and that will payoff in the future. I believe Lang is the guy at guard, he is healed this year and should be much better. Playing Sherrod at guard pushes Lang and, as mentioned, gets Sherrod reps. I think MM is looking at the big picture here. Next year Sherrod should make a big jump with the experience from this year, off season conditioning, and OTAs. At least that is my hope.
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
Greg C.
13 years ago
It helps to remember what happened with Bulaga last year. He was drafted even higher than Sherrod and was given a chance to compete for a starting job in training camp, but he lost out. When he was pushed into the starting lineup around week five due to injury, he was kind of shaky, but he improved steadily and was very good by the end of the season and throughout the playoffs. So like most others, I won't be worried about him if Lang beats him out.
blank
DakotaT
13 years ago

With the lockout and being a rookie I would be surprised to see Sherrod play, especially early, unless pushed into action. But I think he is getting valuable reps and that will payoff in the future. I believe Lang is the guy at guard, he is healed this year and should be much better. Playing Sherrod at guard pushes Lang and, as mentioned, gets Sherrod reps. I think Mike McCarthy is looking at the big picture here. Next year Sherrod should make a big jump with the experience from this year, off season conditioning, and OTAs. At least that is my hope.

Originally Posted by: PackerTraxx 




I kind of miss Mike Sherman. With him we had a plethora of coaching decisions to question and debate. With McCarthy toting that shiny new ring - we're all kind of in STFU mode. Take a seat and enjoy the ride you dumbasses. And with Ted Thompson plugging players with pro bowl potential, our biggest decision is which jerseys to buy. Damn it's good to be a Packer Backer.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
13 years ago
Forcing rookies to start day one is asking for trouble.. having them earn the playing time when ready is a recipe for success.

There is no issue if Sherrod starts in observation mode.. actually more than likely beneficial to all parties involved.

I think the Packers are testing the boundaries of both Lang and Sherrod to see what they have and more importantly what they don't... and then the staff will adjust accordingly for the season and the roster counts.

Having both be able to move to the edge or the inside would allow the Packers to carry a minimum of players on the line.. allowing for more flexibility in other areas of the team.

If we can win a championship with the roller coaster play of a Colledge.. we will be fine with two talented young men like Lang and Sherrod.. I really think the Packers are concerned with losing depth in a Spitz type.. and are seeing what they have.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
"roller coaster play of a Colledge" WTF?!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!??!?! You trying to get Mrs Colledge to wreak havoc on this site or what???
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
13 years ago

"roller coaster play of a Colledge" WTF?!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!??!?! You trying to get Mrs Colledge to wreak havoc on this site or what???

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



No worries.. the concern now is how unjust Colledge was treated by not getting an invite to some white house. [grin1]

I have actually been waiting for her to drop a letter into the GBPG.. lol.


"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
zombieslayer
13 years ago

Forcing rookies to start day one is asking for trouble.. having them earn the playing time when ready is a recipe for success.

There is no issue if Sherrod starts in observation mode.. actually more than likely beneficial to all parties involved.

I think the Packers are testing the boundaries of both Lang and Sherrod to see what they have and more importantly what they don't... and then the staff will adjust accordingly for the season and the roster counts.

Having both be able to move to the edge or the inside would allow the Packers to carry a minimum of players on the line.. allowing for more flexibility in other areas of the team.

If we can win a championship with the roller coaster play of a Colledge.. we will be fine with two talented young men like Lang and Sherrod.. I really think the Packers are concerned with losing depth in a Spitz type.. and are seeing what they have.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



I was waiting for your analysis before commenting. Yeah, rookie OLs rarely shine even when they're 1st round picks. I'm not too worried as I was under the impression that Sherrod was drafted for 2012 and beyond, not for 2011 anyways. (And yes, Ted will draft another OL in the 1st or 2nd round in 2012).
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

His arms are too short, cut him.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 




won't that make his arms even shorter? 😳
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (42m) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (58m) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (1h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (1h) : now 3
Zero2Cool (2h) : Who? What?
beast (11h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (15h) : meh
Zero2Cool (19h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (19h) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (19h) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (22h) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (22h) : Only 4
wpr (22h) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
14m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.