wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

Analysis: Green Bay Packers rookie T Derek Sherrod looks too green to be a starter 



The Packers came into camp excited about first-round draft pick Derek Sherrod possibly starting this year, but after watching their preseason opener Saturday night at Cleveland, I’m not so sure they should be, not as a starter right away.

Sherrod is a natural left tackle playing left guard, and he has a lot of work to do to be a starter in the NFL. I don’t think he finishes well. He sometimes stays on blocks for a little bit, but he doesn’t block until the whistle. He has the ability to get out to linebackers in the run game, and he has the size and reach and body type to do it, but he just didn’t finish blocks against the Browns. He also needs to play with lower pad level and use his hands better, be under control with his hands.

Even in pass blocking he didn’t finish and allowed some pressure. This is the easiest thing for him to correct right now, finish his blocks. They’ll go to the tape and tell him, ‘You can block longer than you have been.’ That part I think will be OK.
EDIT

Packernews.com wrote:


UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
His arms are too short, cut him.
UserPostedImage
PackerTraxx
13 years ago
With the lockout and being a rookie I would be surprised to see Sherrod play, especially early, unless pushed into action. But I think he is getting valuable reps and that will payoff in the future. I believe Lang is the guy at guard, he is healed this year and should be much better. Playing Sherrod at guard pushes Lang and, as mentioned, gets Sherrod reps. I think Mike McCarthy is looking at the big picture here. Next year Sherrod should make a big jump with the experience from this year, off season conditioning, and OTAs. At least that is my hope.
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
Greg C.
13 years ago
It helps to remember what happened with Bulaga last year. He was drafted even higher than Sherrod and was given a chance to compete for a starting job in training camp, but he lost out. When he was pushed into the starting lineup around week five due to injury, he was kind of shaky, but he improved steadily and was very good by the end of the season and throughout the playoffs. So like most others, I won't be worried about him if Lang beats him out.
blank
DakotaT
13 years ago

With the lockout and being a rookie I would be surprised to see Sherrod play, especially early, unless pushed into action. But I think he is getting valuable reps and that will payoff in the future. I believe Lang is the guy at guard, he is healed this year and should be much better. Playing Sherrod at guard pushes Lang and, as mentioned, gets Sherrod reps. I think Mike McCarthy is looking at the big picture here. Next year Sherrod should make a big jump with the experience from this year, off season conditioning, and OTAs. At least that is my hope.

Originally Posted by: PackerTraxx 




I kind of miss Mike Sherman. With him we had a plethora of coaching decisions to question and debate. With McCarthy toting that shiny new ring - we're all kind of in STFU mode. Take a seat and enjoy the ride you dumbasses. And with Ted Thompson plugging players with pro bowl potential, our biggest decision is which jerseys to buy. Damn it's good to be a Packer Backer.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
13 years ago
Forcing rookies to start day one is asking for trouble.. having them earn the playing time when ready is a recipe for success.

There is no issue if Sherrod starts in observation mode.. actually more than likely beneficial to all parties involved.

I think the Packers are testing the boundaries of both Lang and Sherrod to see what they have and more importantly what they don't... and then the staff will adjust accordingly for the season and the roster counts.

Having both be able to move to the edge or the inside would allow the Packers to carry a minimum of players on the line.. allowing for more flexibility in other areas of the team.

If we can win a championship with the roller coaster play of a Colledge.. we will be fine with two talented young men like Lang and Sherrod.. I really think the Packers are concerned with losing depth in a Spitz type.. and are seeing what they have.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
"roller coaster play of a Colledge" WTF?!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!??!?! You trying to get Mrs Colledge to wreak havoc on this site or what???
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
13 years ago

"roller coaster play of a Colledge" WTF?!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!??!?! You trying to get Mrs Colledge to wreak havoc on this site or what???

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



No worries.. the concern now is how unjust Colledge was treated by not getting an invite to some white house. [grin1]

I have actually been waiting for her to drop a letter into the GBPG.. lol.


"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
zombieslayer
13 years ago

Forcing rookies to start day one is asking for trouble.. having them earn the playing time when ready is a recipe for success.

There is no issue if Sherrod starts in observation mode.. actually more than likely beneficial to all parties involved.

I think the Packers are testing the boundaries of both Lang and Sherrod to see what they have and more importantly what they don't... and then the staff will adjust accordingly for the season and the roster counts.

Having both be able to move to the edge or the inside would allow the Packers to carry a minimum of players on the line.. allowing for more flexibility in other areas of the team.

If we can win a championship with the roller coaster play of a Colledge.. we will be fine with two talented young men like Lang and Sherrod.. I really think the Packers are concerned with losing depth in a Spitz type.. and are seeing what they have.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



I was waiting for your analysis before commenting. Yeah, rookie OLs rarely shine even when they're 1st round picks. I'm not too worried as I was under the impression that Sherrod was drafted for 2012 and beyond, not for 2011 anyways. (And yes, Ted will draft another OL in the 1st or 2nd round in 2012).
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

His arms are too short, cut him.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 




won't that make his arms even shorter? 😳
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (1h) : @AaronNagler · 2m Both Jordan Love and Malik Willis were Limited participants at Packers practice today.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Johnson didn't make it until 2020. Ring 2023. 🤷 Personally, he should have been in years prior to Hall.
Zero2Cool (4h) : HUMP DAY
beast (4h) : Guys that have a good shot at making the NFL Hall of Fame usually get into their teams pretty fast
beast (4h) : Yeah, but is Kampman and the others in the NFL Hall of Fame?
Zero2Cool (4h) : Johnson was Hall of Fame, 2020. Should haev been in Ring a year later, not three years.
Zero2Cool (4h) : I could be wrong there though
Zero2Cool (4h) : Guys like Kampman, Tim Harris, Al Harris, etc all over 15 years. Hall of Fame is 5 year wait
Zero2Cool (4h) : I guess I see players in Packers Hall come way later
beast (4h) : Yeah, usually teams hall of fames are a much lower bar than the NFL
Zero2Cool (4h) : is it uncommon for Hall before Ring?
Zero2Cool (5h) : S Xavier McKinney named first-team All-Pro by NFLPA
beast (6h) : I missed it, sorry, but he got into the NFL Hall of Fame years before that
Zero2Cool (7h) : Jones took his sweet ole time!
Zero2Cool (7h) : Yeah, he's in the ring of honor, just saw video and his name is up there
Zero2Cool (7h) : Didn't they have a thing in 2023 for Jimmy's ring of honor? I swear I saw it
beast (7h) : Though if they're legitimately trying to re-sign MM, then it makes sense.
beast (7h) : Jerry Jones still hasn't put Jimmy Johnson in the Ring of Honor, but he's in the NFL's Hall of Fame, Jones is petty
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Unless the Cowboys are planning an extension, seems kinda petty
beast (20h) : Cowboys denied Bears request
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : From what I'm reading, MM is under contract through the 14th of January; after that he's free game
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : McCarthy let go or not extended??
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Chicago Bears have asked the Dallas Cowboys permission to interview Mike McCarthy for head coaching vacancy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : The winners page that is
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats beast on 2024 !
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats porky on winning 2023 pick'em! (oops sorry)
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Packers have $60M+ of 2025 cap space on paper TODAY.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Missed FG into a Lions TD; that'll do pig, that'll do
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : That might be it for the Vikings
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Oh so the refs do know what intentional grounding is
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : what the hell was that Goff?! Not much pressure and he just air mails it to Harrison
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : They really need to to get rid of the auto first down for illegal contact
Martha Careful (6-Jan) : watching the Vikings and Lions it's understandable why they swept the Packers. So much better product
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Even when GB got pressure he was throwing darts; vs no pressure on that last pass he just air mails an open guy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : didn't have guys in his face ... pressure makes difference
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Where was this Darnold vs GB?
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : BALL DON'T LIE
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : how was that not a safety? Goff throws it at an offensive lineman
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero, I thought that was a given! ;)
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero I looked through earlier and noticed the same thing. Bonkers year. I just wonder if beast put any money on games
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I'm hoping for BLOODBATH. Pummel one another.
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 8 people in pick'em would have won any year with their total lol
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : I'm rooting for the Lions to lose.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : God help me but I'm rooting for the Vikings to...Vikings to...Christ I can't say it
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 4 td for Rodgers
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Chiefs got shutout
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18h / Around The NFL / beast

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

7-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6-Jan / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

3-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.