Zero2Cool
13 years ago
So, yah, it is pretty cool to see the passer rating differential, but that's kind of like analyzing if you scored more points than the other team you win.

If a team is very pass efficient, there's a good chance they won, or it was a high scoring game in which they lost.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
13 years ago

You're the one that brought up hatred and racism, knowing full well it would send me down that tangent. It was practically bait. =d>

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



(Still wonders if DakotaT actually read the original post).

So, yah, it is pretty cool to see the passer rating differential, but that's kind of like analyzing if you scored more points than the other team you win.

If a team is very pass efficient, there's a good chance they won, or it was a high scoring game in which they lost.

Zero2Cool wrote:



Not really. What it implied is that you passed more accurately than the other team.

Let's take a hypothetical example. Team A threw for 300 yards, completed 70% of their passes, 3 TDs, 0 INTs. Ran 10 times for 15 yards (rushing TDs unlisted.

Team B threw for 100 yards, completed 40% of their passes, threw 1 TD and 4 INTs but ran 40 times for 200 yards (rushing TDs unlisted).

Who won?

By the original argument, Team A wins most of the time.

Note that the reason why rushing TDs are unlisted is it's not part of the stats for "rushing O" whereas passing rating is the topic of this post.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡Ή πŸ‡²πŸ‡² πŸ‡¦πŸ‡·
macbob
  • macbob
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

So you and Macbob, huh? May you both get diarrhea tonight. 🀬

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 




That was cold. All I was...just a minute, I'll be right back...

ok, all I was--crap, I'll be back in a minute...

as I was saying, All I...goshdarnit--curse you, ZS! 😲
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

(Still wonders if DakotaT actually read the original post).



Not really. What it implied is that you passed more accurately than the other team.

Let's take a hypothetical example. Team A threw for 300 yards, completed 70% of their passes, 3 TDs, 0 INTs. Ran 10 times for 15 yards (rushing TDs unlisted.

Team B threw for 100 yards, completed 40% of their passes, threw 1 TD and 4 INTs but ran 40 times for 200 yards (rushing TDs unlisted).

Who won?

By the original argument, Team A wins most of the time.

Note that the reason why rushing TDs are unlisted is it's not part of the stats for "rushing O" whereas passing rating is the topic of this post.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 




So you make up one unlikely scenario to try and prove your point, without even putting up the QB rating?




(point of this post, get it fucking back on topic you diarrhea fuckers!!!!)
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
13 years ago




(point of this post, get it fucking back on topic you diarrhea fuckers!!!!)

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 




You should have a conversation with my mother sometime Zero, she switches topics mid-sentence. Gifted people can have 2 or 3 thoughts going on at the same time, it's when they communicate them at the same time that you have trouble.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

You should have a conversation with my mother sometime Zero, she switches topics mid-sentence. Gifted people can have 2 or 3 thoughts going on at the same time, it's when they communicate them at the same time that you have trouble.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 


Oh fine, there's no saving this one! lol

I'd rather not, nothing personal, but I've had several friends of mine start laughing when I'm telling them something. They claim that I change subjects middle of a sentence and sometimes, even in the middle of a word. The first to notice was Evan and he never said a damn thing to me until I finally asked "dude... why you laughing man, I didn't even tell you the funny part".

He claims it's my ADD kick'n into overdrive.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
13 years ago

So you make up one unlikely scenario to try and prove your point, without even putting up the QB rating?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Passer rating is implied. A rating like that would definitely be well over 100+, probably around 120-130. That's the point. With a real high passer rating vs your opponent's real low passer rating (let's say theirs was around 40 or 50), the rushing yards become irrelevant. The team that passed better won.

Oh and Macbob, I was joking. I hope you don't get diarrhea. As for DakotaT though.....
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡Ή πŸ‡²πŸ‡² πŸ‡¦πŸ‡·
DakotaT
13 years ago

Oh fine, there's no saving this one! lol

I'd rather not, nothing personal, but I've had several friends of mine start laughing when I'm telling them something. They claim that I change subjects middle of a sentence and sometimes, even in the middle of a word. The first to notice was Evan and he never said a damn thing to me until I finally asked "dude... why you laughing man, I didn't even tell you the funny part".

He claims it's my ADD kick'n into overdrive.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 




So why so pissed when we hijack threads? Conformity sucks.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

So why so pissed when we hijack threads? Conformity sucks.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 


I wasn't aware I was pissed, thanks for the memo. πŸ™‚

BTW, it's the off season, no thread stays on topic and I really don't much care... unless the topic is about something important, you know, like my daughter.

Passer rating is implied. A rating like that would definitely be well over 100+, probably around 120-130. That's the point. With a real high passer rating vs your opponent's real low passer rating (let's say theirs was around 40 or 50), the rushing yards become irrelevant. The team that passed better won.

Oh and Macbob, I was joking. I hope you don't get diarrhea. As for DakotaT though.....

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



What the hell, you some politician or something? I'm done watching you run circles with a unlikely specific scenario that has no numbers to support it, oh wait, it's ... wait for it .... IMPLIED!

[duh] [duh] [duh]
o:) πŸ˜‡ πŸ˜‡
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
13 years ago

Passer rating is implied. A rating like that would definitely be well over 100+, probably around 120-130. That's the point. With a real high passer rating vs your opponent's real low passer rating (let's say theirs was around 40 or 50), the rushing yards become irrelevant. The team that passed better won.

Oh and Macbob, I was joking. I hope you don't get diarrhea. As for DakotaT though.....

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



Lets go with 35 attempts? First one would be 125.9.

20 attempts seems fair on the second one... That'd make the passer rating 33.3.

Anyway, the highly improbable part in your example are the stats themselves. I don't think that you need a good running game to win anymore, but it's a huge help and putting up such bad stats while your RB rushes for 200 yards would mean that you're playing Ryan Leaf or something.

But yeah, the point itsself is somewhat obvious. It's one in the line of "teams who rush more in the 4th usually win", "teams who get more turnovers than they throw tend to come out on top" and "when you score more points than the opponent, you generally win".
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (12h) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Who?
Zero2Cool (17h) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (20h) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Zero2Cool (20h) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : uh oh
Martha Careful (1-Apr) : Too bad camera's can't spot the ball as well.
Mucky Tundra (1-Apr) : So will the chain gang be gone completely or will they still be around as a backup or whatever?
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : The method for measuring first downs in the NFL will switch from chain gangs to camera-based technology in 2025, the league announced.
Martha Careful (1-Apr) : A big step in the right direction. Just put in the college system is very very good.
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : NFL has passed a rule that allows both teams to possess the ball in OT during the regular season
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : Touchbacks on kickoffs will now bring the ball to the 35-yard line.
beast (31-Mar) : It might of gotten more popular recently, but braiding hair (even men) in certain cultures goes back for centuries.
Martha Careful (30-Mar) : Is men braiding their hair a new style thing? Watching the NCAA men's tournament many players have done
Zero2Cool (29-Mar) : Ha. Well, it'd be nice for folks to reset their own password. Via validated email 😏
beast (29-Mar) : Monopoly was supposed to be an educational game, that show how evil capitalism was and how we should avoid it
beast (29-Mar) : Lol, I was thinking username would be better, as then I wouldn't have to keep an email up to date lol πŸ˜‚
beast (29-Mar) : Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : I was thinking email because I think it'll make folks keep it up todate lol
wpr (29-Mar) : sure is
Zero2Cool (29-Mar) : Monopoly is a rip off of The Landlord's Game
wpr (27-Mar) : 28 days until the draft
earthquake (27-Mar) : Which seemed strange to my 9 year old self, that you could be a fan for a team other than the one you play for
earthquake (27-Mar) : Nothing eventful happened, other than it being clear that he was a bengals fan
earthquake (27-Mar) : And we went and hung out with him one afternoon, I must have been 9 or so
earthquake (27-Mar) : That’s wild, when I was a kid my friend lived in the same apartment complex in De Pere
Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : Only career highspot was a 200 yard rushing game while playing for the Cardinals
Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : He is a former Packer. Drafted out of Northern Illinois. Didn't do much in GB.
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Despicable
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Former NFL. I think Packers too
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : NFL RB Leshon Johnson has been charged in a massive dog fighting operation, with the FBI seizing over 190 Pit Bulls
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : Some real irony of a QB as short as Wilson playing for the Giants
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : Giants country, let's be the tall beings of lore!
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : Russell Wilson signs with the Giants.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : I was thinking email because I think it'll make folks keep it up todate lol
wpr (25-Mar) : I don't think there is a significant difference. I use a user name for many. Others email.
Martha Careful (25-Mar) : email
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : would it be better to use EMAIL or USERNAME to log into a site?
wpr (25-Mar) : Thanks Zero
Zero2Cool (24-Mar) : New forum has the ability to Thank a post now.
beast (24-Mar) : And the only time they have won the Championship in an even year, was the first time they did, in 2006.
beast (24-Mar) : Since 2007, there have been 10 odd numbered years, Wisconsin Women have won the Championship in 7 of those 10 odd numbered years.
buckeyepackfan (24-Mar) : Congratulations Lady Badger Hockey Team. NATIONAL CHAMPIONS!!
Zero2Cool (23-Mar) : I don't think it's completed yet. it was just announced last month, right?
dhazer (23-Mar) : did netflix ever release the Packers documentary
Zero2Cool (21-Mar) : And it is glorious!
beast (21-Mar) : Unsigned FA QB Rodgers is supposedly in the Steelers building
Martha Careful (19-Mar) : But I don't own a car! So can I still use it in my apartment?
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : btw, new site auto updates
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : Woohoo!
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / dfosterf

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

25-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

24-Mar / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

24-Mar / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

21-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright Β© 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.comβ„’. All Rights Reserved.