Jon305
13 years ago

Am I crazy to think that, personal preferences aside, it would be in the best interest of the franchise to cut Driver lose and re-sign Jones? Jones is likely to have better numbers than Driver anyway next season if he comes back, and he will be around for several more years.

I know this isn't a popular stance, but if it comes down to letting Jones go just to keep Driver for one more decent season likely, it would seem to make sense.

Thoughts?

"doddpower" wrote:




that actually makes sense as much as I hate to say it.

But remembering his awesome play against 49ers makes me still want him around
blank
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
The statistics wpr cites don't include the 2010 season.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

The statistics wpr cites don't include the 2010 season.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

That's correct.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago

The statistics wpr cites don't include the 2010 season.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



AHHH. That makes sense. I thought he was a lot closer than that. But the numbers are from their website. I thought they would be more current.
UserPostedImage
doddpower
13 years ago

My resistance to such an idea has nothing to do with fan sentimentality and everything to do with my appreciation for Driver's willingness to go over the middle and make the difficult catch, and his ability to battle for the extra yard or two without losing the ball. In terms of raw numbers, Jones' output is better and therefore the move might make sense from that standpoint, but he seemingly cannot be relied upon in pivotal situations. His drops at inopportune times have directly lead to more than one defeat. If Jones could be coached out of his lack of focus, I would say that the team should make such a move in a heartbeat, Driver's feel-good dream of playing till 40 notwithstanding.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



I can understand that point, but it's sounding like the Cobb fella might have some similar attributes. Not to mention Nelson and Finley. I'm pretty sure anything the Driver was going to instill in our WR's other than the rookies has already happened.

I know it can't be predicted, but I do not think it's worth losing Jones for another season like Driver had last year, and then being cut / retired. I honestly think Rodger's will be looking towards Finley and Nelson (and perhaps Cobb / Green) more on third downs anyway. Didn't Driver have the highest drop percentage last season? As was mentioned a few months ago, Jones drops are just noticeable because they're such big plays. However, at least he's getting open and providing an opportunity for such plays, and often making them.

It would be disappointing to lose those years of development in Jones as well. I'm really skeptical of driver having a 700+ yard season as mentioned above.

I don't know, I'm just thinking from a pure business / production standpoint. It's an interesting thought, for sure.
nerdmann
13 years ago

Isn't Donald Driver like 68 yards short of the all time team receiving record?

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Most Yards Receiving, Career
9,656 James Lofton, 1978-86 (9 seasons)
9,050 Donald Driver, 1999-2009 (11 seasons)
8,134 Sterling Sharpe, 1988-94 (7 seasons)
7,991 Don Hutson, 1935-45 (11 seasons)
6,918 Boyd Dowler, 1959-69 (11 seasons)

From GB record book

"wpr" wrote:



http://www.nfl.com/players/donalddriver/profile?id=DRI611685 

9,615

"nerdmann" wrote:





Gotta keep him then. They brought back Ahman Green!
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
Bringing him back so that he can beat the record would be idiotic. They should bring him back because he is the best option available. If he is not, he needs to go.
UserPostedImage
buckeyepackfan
13 years ago

Bringing him back so that he can beat the record would be idiotic. They should bring him back because he is the best option available. If he is not, he needs to go.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



:onfloor: :onfloor:

Packer History, team chemistry, player loyalty be damned!!

DD isn't going anywhere, he may not be the best option, but he still has the talent and ability to play for The Packers.

The team with the best talent isn't always the team that wins.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
PackerTraxx
13 years ago
I would like to see Driver around for a year or two yet in ordor to continue mentoring our WRs especially with Cobb coming in.

Jones might have better statistics but players that drop and fumble balls lose more games than they win.
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
Cheesey
13 years ago

I can see Donald rebounding this year and getting 700 yards and 60 catches. They don't need him to be the 1000 yards 80 reception receiver at this time.
A key 3rd down receiver who can go over the middle. Someone with heart and will to grind it out. He will make the other WR better players because he is on the team. Jones is a fine player but I don't think he can elevate the game of those around him like Donald Driver can.

"wpr" wrote:


What Wayne says makes the most sense to me. Driver is not only an on the field help, his attitude and work ethics off the field is something that the team needs. My wife doesn't know much about football, but she knows who Driver is, and thinks he should be with the Packers because of his attitude and his level of play. He is an emotional leader.
And i don't think Driver has "hit the wall" yet. Is he getting old? Yes. But unlike the quarterback position, there are other players to take up the slack.

I would like to see Jones stay too. But i think he's more likely to want to play somewhere else. I think he will price himself out of GB.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (3h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
beast (4h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (11h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (11h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (12h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (19h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
18m / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

25m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

28m / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.