Mock drafts· Page 8 · PACKERSHOME

PackerTraxx
Senior Member

13 years ago

We are going to have to cut some very good players. I hope Ted Thompson can package a couple of them with a couple of draft picks and move up to obtain a couple of impact rookies. That is my hope.

Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?

Greg C.
Registered

13 years ago

#72

We are going to have to cut some very good players. I hope Ted Thompson can package a couple of them with a couple of draft picks and move up to obtain a couple of impact rookies. That is my hope.

"PackerTraxx" wrote:

I wouldn't hold my breath. Players who are on the lower end of the roster are generally useless as trade bait unless you are trading for a player on the lower end of another team's roster. Those trades usually take place on the final cutdown day in September.

blank

DakotaT
Select Member

13 years ago

#73

We are going to have to cut some very good players. I hope Ted Thompson can package a couple of them with a couple of draft picks and move up to obtain a couple of impact rookies. That is my hope.

"Greg C." wrote:

"PackerTraxx" wrote:

But I would trade Barnett and our first to move up 6 or 7 spots to jump over a team to get a player we could really use like Wiesnewski or Pouncey to play LG.

Flynn would be another option if we think we can make QB out of Graham Harrrell. Flynn is more ready to play than any of these 1st round QB's coming out this year.

Greg C.
Registered

13 years ago

#74

We are going to have to cut some very good players. I hope Ted Thompson can package a couple of them with a couple of draft picks and move up to obtain a couple of impact rookies. That is my hope.

"DakotaT" wrote:

"Greg C." wrote:

"PackerTraxx" wrote:

Yeah, Barnett is the kind of player you might be able to get something for. Flynn also has value, but it doesn't look like Harrell is close to being ready as a backup, so I would be very surprised if Ted traded Flynn.

blank

mi_keys
Senior Member

13 years ago

#75

The thing about OLB in the 3-4 is it one of the most difficult positions to evaluate talent with so few college teams asking these guys to do what they will have to be able to do at the next level.

Somehow Thompson knew that Mathews would be great but there may not be a player in this draft he feels good enough about to chance #32.

There will be a couple guys that get caught up in the wrong place with the way the draft falls so do you pass on a JJ Watt or a Pouncy projected to go higher for a Houston who maybe iffy?

I think Thompson will have to be VERY high on a particular OLB to take the chance in the first round over a couple guys sitting there that are going to be good pro's. With a year under his belt my guess is they feel pretty good about Zombo improving this 2nd year.

This would be where I see Thompson appying BPA. I could see him possibly swoop down in the 2nd for a player he likes. I don't see how 7 rookies can make the team anyhow.

"warhawk" wrote:

That's definitely a fair assessment. If someone like Pouncy is on the board I think Ted is far more likely to get him just because he'd be the best football player available and it's at a position of need. I hope we do try to get someone to strengthen our OLB group though, whether that be from a free agent or someone in the draft that's in the first 2 or 3 rounds. If there just isn't one in the draft though go with other positions. I'd rather go into next year with the outside linebackers we have and draft guys that are more likely to make an impact than stretch and take a risk on an outside linebacker just to get one, which I guess is the whole BPA idea.

Born and bred a cheesehead

warhawk
Senior Member

13 years ago

#76

Thompson has to be drooling the way the Packers are set up and he can take players with great potential that other teams will pass on in a given round for somebody more ready to play now.

A scenario like J. Finley. Young, raw, but a boat load of talent. By year 3 he was a monster.

I can see Thompson cherry picking a few of these guys especially since the organization likes bringing players up giving them time to learn the system.

With that it may not be a draft year where you see a lot out of the rookies in this first year. Based on the way the roster will look it's o.k. if these guys don't come on for a year or so.

I see this as a scenario Ted Thompson loves to be in. It's a perfect place to be where the team does not need rookies to make the team better but they will make the team better in time. With the way rosters change it would be great to have players ready by the time some players are lost thru FA or retirement.

He does this right and he can pace the talent to allow the team to stay on top for years. If you see several players drafted labled as "great prospect needs time to develope" don't be surprised.

"The train is leaving the station."

nerdmann
Premier Member

13 years ago

#77

I think at least one of the unheralded OLBs we currently have will step up and make a statement. Still, it would be awesome to have another guy the calibur of Clay Matthews or close to it.
I'd also like a CB, esp one who can return punts, a LG and if there is a stud RB, grab him. I think Starks is the real deal though. LOL. But we got 4 potential #1 WRs, will have 2 elite passcatching TEs, so I'd like to have more than one potential all pro HB. Yes I know, we still have Grant.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

sunflower100
Registered

13 years ago

#78

And Ted Thompson will select someone those guys don't have on their board at all, lol.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Ted Thompson has picked, who people thought he would, a couple of times. Everybody and their dog thought the Packers would pick Hawk in 2006. I don't think everybody had the Packers taking Raji at 9 in 2009, but he was one of a couple that were usually mocked for the Packers.

However, 2008 was when the Packers traded out of the first round and picked Nelson (nobody had the Packers taking that pick). That was after the 13-3 year.

blank

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

13 years ago

#79

There was also a significant amount of chatter prior to the draft about the Packers possibly taking Bulaga. So it's not like all of Thompson's picks have come from left field.

MassPackersFan
Member

13 years ago

#80

Raji wasn't a surprise either.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (1h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (2h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (12h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (12h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (13h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (13h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (13h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (16h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (16h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (16h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (19h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (19h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (19h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (19h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (19h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (19h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (19h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (19h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (20h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (21h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (21h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (21h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (21h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (21h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (21h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (22h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (22h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS