Dulak
13 years ago
like everyone else I voted rodgers - mainly because of how often favre threw INTs and was irratic.

I think my step dad has developed a complex over the years watching favre play. He was only a casual fan but I my step dad saying "favre did it again" as he throws another game losing INT ...
Pack93z
13 years ago
I took Rodgers, because without him I doubt we would be here today.

In the Atlanta game when they took all the momentum from the Packers with the kick return, he settled right down and went back to work.. calmly and without a rush to take it back. He helped the Packers offense march down the field and grind it back, thus putting a cloud of doubt over the Falcons on whether they could stop the Packers.

In a game with this much hype and this much pressure.. I like the calm that Rodgers has on the field. No rocket balls.. no trying to get it all on one shot.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
peteralan71
13 years ago
The only time that I recall Rodgers playing poorly in a "big game situation" is during week 1 this year. He, as well as the rest of the team and offense, had so much hype coming in, and he simply did not have a good game. He looked way too excited and jittery. Other than that, the guy has been an oak.
Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.
UserPostedImage
RaiderPride
13 years ago
22-0

Wow. I never thought I would ever see that on this forum.
""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
peteralan71
13 years ago

22-0

Wow. I never thought I would ever see that on this forum.

"RaiderPride" wrote:

My thoughts exactly. I would have liked to see this thread at the end of last season. I think there still would be many Brent Believers.
Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.
UserPostedImage
13 years ago
You know what my choice is.

UserPostedImage
UserPostedImage
peteralan71
13 years ago
LOL!!!! That is seriously one of the best pictures I've seen for awhile! Nice work!
Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.
UserPostedImage
porky88
13 years ago
The one vote for Brett Favre (so far) was me.

In his prime, which he was in 97, he was arguably the best QB in history. There isn't a better five-year run a QB has ever had than Favre's run in 94-98. He did it all through that span.

That's why I would take him over anyone in that span.

Saying Rodgers is more stable couldnt be more accurate. I think Rodgers has a chance to be more stable or consistent throughout his career than Favre. There was a drop-off in Favre's play after Holmgren left. It is evident when going back and watching the games.

I don't think Rodgers is going to see many drop-offs between now and the end of the decade. I think his consistency is his strength and that will not come across in just one game. It will come across throughout his career.
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

The one vote for Brett Favre (so far) was me.

"porky88" wrote:

I knew it would be too, it's your style. ;)

Trend this way, Matt that way!


I think other than losing his father, losing Holmgren hurt Brett's career more than anything. It's my belief it wasn't until McCarthy that someone finally started to reel him in again.

Brett was pretty awesome in '97 too, but I'm old, my heart can't handle the extreme HIGHS and LOWS anymore, thus, I trust Aaron a hair more. ๐Ÿ™‚
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
13 years ago

You know what my choice is.

UserPostedImage

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



I'm going to stay out of this one as it's like if you had two kids and someone asked you which one you liked better.

However, this picture deserves an applause point.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡น ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (2h) : Merry Christmas!
beast (11h) : Merry Christmas ๐ŸŽ„๐ŸŽ
beast (19h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
9m / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

21m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

15h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22h / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright ยฉ 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.comโ„ข. All Rights Reserved.