Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago

It's Time for the NFL To Re-Seed the Postseason 
By Daniel Bartemus
(Contributor) on December 30, 2010

[img_r]http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/images_root/images/photos/001/099/941/98676822_crop_340x234.jpg?1293743060[/img_r]The Miami Dolphins, Minnesota Vikings, Washington Redskins, San Diego Chargers, Oakland Raiders and Tennessee Titans must be green with envy.

The New York Giants and Tampa Bay Buccaneers will likely be seeing red come Sunday night.

The top list consists of teams whose records range from 6-9 to 8-7 and were either eliminated from playoff contention last weekend or have been for weeks. If this group played in the NFC West, each would be playing for a playoff spot in Week 17.

The Giants and Buccaneers both sit at 9-6 and need to win their finale and get help to reach the postseason. If either played in the NFC West, they could sit their starters this weekend because they would already be division champions. Instead, both are likely to be sitting at home watching the playoffs despite having a better record than the West champion.

Sunday nights game between the Seattle Seahawks and St. Louis Rams should be meaningless. Seattle is 6-9 and the Rams are 7-8, yet the winner will be wearing "NFC West Champions 2010" t-shirts and dancing around at midfield.

The NFL, which bans everything from touchdown celebrations to wearing funny looking socks, should also disallow any type of postgame celebration. It should be deemed an excessive and fine-able offense.

Not only are we going to be stuck watching one of these teams play on Wild Card Weekend, but the winner is going to be hosting a playoff game. That means the defending Super Bowl champion New Orleans Saints are likely going to have to get on a plane and travel to St. Louis or Seattle, despite the fact that they will have finished with four or five more wins.

I pity the Giants and Bucs because both are playoff-caliber, but this isnt the first time a potential wild card team had a better record than a division winner only to be left out of the postseason party, and it wont be the last. The NFL cant do away with its divisions for various obvious reasons, but it needs to look into ways to make the playoff format more fair and balanced.

Here are two of the simplest suggestions: re-seed the participants based on record, or keep the seeding the same, but let the team with the better record host the game.

The NBA adopted the latter method a few years ago after running into the same problem. This way works for both sides because the "division champion" label means nothing, rewarding the team with the better record, and the league doesnt have to go through the trouble of re-seeding every round.

However, the NBA has taken a liking to using Band-Aids to cover up more serious wounds when all observers can see stitches should be applied. The NFL, and the NBA for that matter, should swallow its pride and re-seed.

Not only will this give each team the seed it deserves based on record, God forbid, but this method makes it more likely that the best teams are going to be playing the longest in the postseason. This will maximize the NFL product and its certainly what the fans want, so why is the league so hesitant? There are zero negatives to re-seeding, other then division winners will no longer be guaranteed to host a playoff game.

Hosting a playoff game is a big deal because home field advantage is a big deal, especially in the playoffs. Shouldnt it be given to the teams with the best records, not the team that won the worst division possibly in NFL history with a LOSING RECORD?! And how long would it take for the league to re-seed its playoff teams? Five minutes? Please, dont strain yourselves.

If the playoffs started this weekend, here is how the NFC bracket would look:

1. Atlanta Falcons: 12-3

2. Chicago Bears: 11-4

3. Philadelphia Eagles: 10-5

4. St. Louis Rams: 7-8

5. New Orleans Saints: 11-4

6. Green Bay Packers: 9-6

To eliminate any confusion, Ill spell out why this is flawed. In the wild card round, the Eagles would host the Packers, and the Rams would host the Saints. Theres really only one injustice in this round because if it were re-seeded, the Eagles would move down to No. 4, while the Packers move up to No. 5, meaning Philadelphia would still host Green Bay in the first round.

The current issue is, obviously, the Rams getting the four spot, which could cost the Saints. First, as previously stated, they have to play on the road in the first round but, assuming they win, the second round is where New Orleans could really get shafted.

If the Eagles protect home field against Green Bay, that would mean the Saints travel to Atlanta to play the top seeded Falcons in the divisional playoffs, while the Eagles go to Chicago to face the Bears.

There are two problems here. First, New Orleans is tied for the second best record in the conference, yet theyre playing a second road game in as many weeks, and have to play the top seed in the second round, when records and the eye test show that the Saints and Falcons should be playing for the NFC Championship.

Secondly, New Orleans has a better record than Philadelphia but would be playing a harder opponent in the second round, meaning the Saints got a raw deal in each of the first two rounds. First, a road game; second, they facing longer odds to advance to a second consecutive NFC Championship Game.

If the bracket was re-seeded, the Saints would move to No. 3 and St. Louis would get bumped to No. 6. In this scenario, New Orleans would rightfully play host to the Rams, and if both the Saints and Eagles won, New Orleans would go to Chicago and Philadelphia would travel to Atlanta, entirely fixing the defect in the current system.

In the end, the only thing that re-seeding really changed for the opening round was the host city in one matchup, but as you can see, that one switch could potentially make a world of difference later on in the postseason.

Because Commissioner Roger Goodell does everything in his mighty power to keep the few deficiencies of his league tightly concealed, its a wonder that hes allowing NBC to flex this game into the Sunday primetime slot for all the world to see.

On the surface its a celebration of mediocrity, but so much more lies beneath. The NFL needs to make some changes and thats why a lockout seems imminent.

Hopefully Sunday nights game and eventual winner will force the league to reconsider its seriously flawed playoff format.


For more, visit my website www.pointbartemus.com, a sports forum.


UserPostedImage
Packers_Finland
14 years ago
Stop bitching. Unless a .500 team makes into the playoffs I'm satisfied. If Seattle wins, re-seed, if not, don't.
This is a placeholder
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
Pedant's point: Technically, if the Rams win, won't they be a .500 team?


(Oh, and I'd rather have the emphasis on divisional representation with an occasional .500 or below winner getting in, than just go by straight winning percentage.)
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
Rams would be .500 if they win.
Seahwaks would be sub .500 if they win.



I'd rather the best four records get a home game but then again I think winning the division of four teams is pretty weak.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
14 years ago
It is what it is.
Is it fair? I really think it is. If you are "lucky" enough to be in a weak division, you have a chance to make the playoffs.
The Bears get the #2 seed with an 11-5 record. I never though 11-5 would get that position.
There was a team a few years back that went 11-5 and didn't even make the playoffs.
Tampa and NY finished 10-6 and didn't make it.
It is what it is.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
I think you're referring to the Patriots, Cheesey, the year Tom Brady went out in the first game.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

It is what it is.

"Cheesey" wrote:



[align=center]HOLY SHIT!!! It ... is what it ... is!!

NO FUCKING WAY!!![/align]


I just never thought of it like that. JUST SAYING!!!!
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
14 years ago
They should just put two more teams in as wild cards and make everyone play week 1. Division winners my ass. Both AFC and NFC West divisions are atrocious as is the AFC south. Pittsburgh and Baltimore get 4 gimme games a year with Cleveland and Cincinatti as does New England with Buffalo and Miami.
UserPostedImage
rabidgopher04
14 years ago

It is what it is.
Is it fair? I really think it is. If you are "lucky" enough to be in a weak division, you have a chance to make the playoffs.
The Bears get the #2 seed with an 11-5 record. I never though 11-5 would get that position.
There was a team a few years back that went 11-5 and didn't even make the playoffs.
Tampa and NY finished 10-6 and didn't make it.
It is what it is.

"Cheesey" wrote:



I disagree. It isn't what it is. It can change and should as described in the article above. For instance, without re-seeding, when the Packers beat the Eagles on Sunday they will then play the Falcons in the divisional round, then potentially the Bears, Saints, or Rams/Seahawks in the NFC Championship. Worst of all, the Packers would have to travel to St. Louis or Seattle in this instance even though the Packers have the better record. It seems to me that the Bears and Packers should be meeting up in the divisional round. It's all screwy with a super weak division like the NFC West.
Amazing Bacon Delivery  Service! Never be without good bacon again.
musccy
14 years ago
If you re-seeded based on record (and assume head-head would be first tiebreaker) NO would host Sea, and GB would host Phil.

I was rooting for Sea tonight because it takes a squeaky wheel to break out the oil, and a 7-9 team that is 3-10 when playing outside of their division that was collectively outscored by 327 points this year should emit a pretty loud squeak!
Fan Shout
dfosterf (49m) : Hopefully Jerry reaches under the seat cushions and ashtrays of his jet and scrapes up the 45 million apr and spares us further nonsense
dfosterf (1h) : Have to admit the PO'd Cowboy fan videos would be fun to watch. Problem with draft picks is half their fanbase barely knows what that is
beast (1h) : I think Cowboys fans are ready to get their pitch forks and burning sticks if Jerry were to trade Micah
dfosterf (1h) : If Jerry traded Micah to GB, here in northern Va. they would have to quick build yet another data center to handle the internet hate traffic
Zero2Cool (1h) : its signing and trades that you don't hear about, other then announced
Zero2Cool (1h) : If you hear rumors about Packers sign or trade, won't happen. Not how they work
dfosterf (1h) : 19 players in a contract year. Jones called loss to us worst loss in Cowboy history. Forget Parsons trade. Not happenin' Cap'n
packerfanoutwest (3h) : The Packers, meanwhile, are the youngest team in the league for the third consecutive year.
dfosterf (5h) : That it was darkest before the dawn in Bengals and Commanders before they got deals done
Zero2Cool (5h) : what is Schefter saying?
dfosterf (5h) : He was getting Dorito infusion therapy
dfosterf (5h) : He's outta shape. Why, just the other day I saw him splayed out on the trainers table
Mucky Tundra (12h) : Parsons has followed Rasheed Walker on Twitter. Quite the choice
Mucky Tundra (12h) : Kuhn is a former player who works for the team, if somethings going down, he would be close to it
Mucky Tundra (12h) : @kuhnj30 Micah Freaking Parsons
Mucky Tundra (12h) : A LOT of buzz on the Bird App regarding Parsons; even Schefter is saying it's serious
dfosterf (17h) : *Orzech*
dfosterf (17h) : Orzich long snapper 3 yr extension
Zero2Cool (18h) : Packers signed someone for three year deal
Zero2Cool (18h) : lol i know it's insane ... sign up for the waiver wire then you'll know
wpr (18h) : YES!!!!!!
Mucky Tundra (18h) : WE WANT THE LIST! WE WANT THE LIST!
Zero2Cool (19h) : @JJLahey · 2m Holy crap, Packers, where the heck is the list?
Zero2Cool (19h) : haha folks on Tweeter every year this time ... 'where is list Packers!!" hahaha
wpr (20h) : He played pretty good.
Zero2Cool (20h) : NAZIR STACKHOUSE HAS MADE THE 53
Zero2Cool (21h) : NOOOOO KALEN IS GONE
Zero2Cool (21h) : Kalen King and Kamal Hadden making it. me thinks
schroeder84 (21h) : @dfosterf I suspect Elgersma WILL be hard to hide. Raw, but talented
Zero2Cool (23h) : pp.com is broken, halt testing, gotta go do work things for a bit
hardrocker950 (23h) : Mecole Hardman was released, to the surprise of few
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : PP.com updated. Reset Password works, and now User Profile pages are a thing
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : Soft hope plan is having fantasy football weekly on-site that i build. cannot do that with this setup.
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : It's older technology, resource hog, cannot be upgraded/changed. That's to start.
packerfanoutwest (25-Aug) : Ok, but what is wrong with this site?
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : check out packerpeople.com
Mucky Tundra (25-Aug) : Oh crap I missed that! I thought it was a 2026 pick
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : It wasn't even next year pick, it's two years away. old dog food value
Mucky Tundra (25-Aug) : Yep! Everytime a team trades with Howie that team is the loser (so says the media)
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : We are hosed.
Mucky Tundra (25-Aug) : Per Schefter, GB is sending a 6th rounder for OT Darian Kennard
Zero2Cool (24-Aug) : Finally got new site to keep folks logged in. New tech is pain sometimes
dfosterf (23-Aug) : Taylor Elgersma is going to be very hard to hide.
Mucky Tundra (23-Aug) : Matthew Golden=DAWG (so load the wagons!!) !!!!!
dfosterf (18-Aug) : We do have good depth at running back imo. Still so frustrating. Bitching about it is a futile excercise, which I plan to do anyway.
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : Whoops, I thought Zero was saying it was a surprise the Brewers lost and not Lloyd being hurt
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : Not a surprise; inevitable
Zero2Cool (17-Aug) : Brewers streak ends at 14
Zero2Cool (17-Aug) : SURPRISE
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : @mattschneidman Matt LaFleur on MarShawn Lloyd: “He’s gonna miss some time.”
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
21m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

3h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

21h / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

25-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

24-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

24-Aug / Around The NFL / beast

23-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

22-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

19-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Aug / Around The NFL / isaiah

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.