Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago

It's Time for the NFL To Re-Seed the Postseason 
By Daniel Bartemus
(Contributor) on December 30, 2010

[img_r]http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/images_root/images/photos/001/099/941/98676822_crop_340x234.jpg?1293743060[/img_r]The Miami Dolphins, Minnesota Vikings, Washington Redskins, San Diego Chargers, Oakland Raiders and Tennessee Titans must be green with envy.

The New York Giants and Tampa Bay Buccaneers will likely be seeing red come Sunday night.

The top list consists of teams whose records range from 6-9 to 8-7 and were either eliminated from playoff contention last weekend or have been for weeks. If this group played in the NFC West, each would be playing for a playoff spot in Week 17.

The Giants and Buccaneers both sit at 9-6 and need to win their finale and get help to reach the postseason. If either played in the NFC West, they could sit their starters this weekend because they would already be division champions. Instead, both are likely to be sitting at home watching the playoffs despite having a better record than the West champion.

Sunday nights game between the Seattle Seahawks and St. Louis Rams should be meaningless. Seattle is 6-9 and the Rams are 7-8, yet the winner will be wearing "NFC West Champions 2010" t-shirts and dancing around at midfield.

The NFL, which bans everything from touchdown celebrations to wearing funny looking socks, should also disallow any type of postgame celebration. It should be deemed an excessive and fine-able offense.

Not only are we going to be stuck watching one of these teams play on Wild Card Weekend, but the winner is going to be hosting a playoff game. That means the defending Super Bowl champion New Orleans Saints are likely going to have to get on a plane and travel to St. Louis or Seattle, despite the fact that they will have finished with four or five more wins.

I pity the Giants and Bucs because both are playoff-caliber, but this isnt the first time a potential wild card team had a better record than a division winner only to be left out of the postseason party, and it wont be the last. The NFL cant do away with its divisions for various obvious reasons, but it needs to look into ways to make the playoff format more fair and balanced.

Here are two of the simplest suggestions: re-seed the participants based on record, or keep the seeding the same, but let the team with the better record host the game.

The NBA adopted the latter method a few years ago after running into the same problem. This way works for both sides because the "division champion" label means nothing, rewarding the team with the better record, and the league doesnt have to go through the trouble of re-seeding every round.

However, the NBA has taken a liking to using Band-Aids to cover up more serious wounds when all observers can see stitches should be applied. The NFL, and the NBA for that matter, should swallow its pride and re-seed.

Not only will this give each team the seed it deserves based on record, God forbid, but this method makes it more likely that the best teams are going to be playing the longest in the postseason. This will maximize the NFL product and its certainly what the fans want, so why is the league so hesitant? There are zero negatives to re-seeding, other then division winners will no longer be guaranteed to host a playoff game.

Hosting a playoff game is a big deal because home field advantage is a big deal, especially in the playoffs. Shouldnt it be given to the teams with the best records, not the team that won the worst division possibly in NFL history with a LOSING RECORD?! And how long would it take for the league to re-seed its playoff teams? Five minutes? Please, dont strain yourselves.

If the playoffs started this weekend, here is how the NFC bracket would look:

1. Atlanta Falcons: 12-3

2. Chicago Bears: 11-4

3. Philadelphia Eagles: 10-5

4. St. Louis Rams: 7-8

5. New Orleans Saints: 11-4

6. Green Bay Packers: 9-6

To eliminate any confusion, Ill spell out why this is flawed. In the wild card round, the Eagles would host the Packers, and the Rams would host the Saints. Theres really only one injustice in this round because if it were re-seeded, the Eagles would move down to No. 4, while the Packers move up to No. 5, meaning Philadelphia would still host Green Bay in the first round.

The current issue is, obviously, the Rams getting the four spot, which could cost the Saints. First, as previously stated, they have to play on the road in the first round but, assuming they win, the second round is where New Orleans could really get shafted.

If the Eagles protect home field against Green Bay, that would mean the Saints travel to Atlanta to play the top seeded Falcons in the divisional playoffs, while the Eagles go to Chicago to face the Bears.

There are two problems here. First, New Orleans is tied for the second best record in the conference, yet theyre playing a second road game in as many weeks, and have to play the top seed in the second round, when records and the eye test show that the Saints and Falcons should be playing for the NFC Championship.

Secondly, New Orleans has a better record than Philadelphia but would be playing a harder opponent in the second round, meaning the Saints got a raw deal in each of the first two rounds. First, a road game; second, they facing longer odds to advance to a second consecutive NFC Championship Game.

If the bracket was re-seeded, the Saints would move to No. 3 and St. Louis would get bumped to No. 6. In this scenario, New Orleans would rightfully play host to the Rams, and if both the Saints and Eagles won, New Orleans would go to Chicago and Philadelphia would travel to Atlanta, entirely fixing the defect in the current system.

In the end, the only thing that re-seeding really changed for the opening round was the host city in one matchup, but as you can see, that one switch could potentially make a world of difference later on in the postseason.

Because Commissioner Roger Goodell does everything in his mighty power to keep the few deficiencies of his league tightly concealed, its a wonder that hes allowing NBC to flex this game into the Sunday primetime slot for all the world to see.

On the surface its a celebration of mediocrity, but so much more lies beneath. The NFL needs to make some changes and thats why a lockout seems imminent.

Hopefully Sunday nights game and eventual winner will force the league to reconsider its seriously flawed playoff format.


For more, visit my website www.pointbartemus.com, a sports forum.


UserPostedImage
Packers_Finland
14 years ago
Stop bitching. Unless a .500 team makes into the playoffs I'm satisfied. If Seattle wins, re-seed, if not, don't.
This is a placeholder
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
Pedant's point: Technically, if the Rams win, won't they be a .500 team?


(Oh, and I'd rather have the emphasis on divisional representation with an occasional .500 or below winner getting in, than just go by straight winning percentage.)
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
Rams would be .500 if they win.
Seahwaks would be sub .500 if they win.



I'd rather the best four records get a home game but then again I think winning the division of four teams is pretty weak.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
14 years ago
It is what it is.
Is it fair? I really think it is. If you are "lucky" enough to be in a weak division, you have a chance to make the playoffs.
The Bears get the #2 seed with an 11-5 record. I never though 11-5 would get that position.
There was a team a few years back that went 11-5 and didn't even make the playoffs.
Tampa and NY finished 10-6 and didn't make it.
It is what it is.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
I think you're referring to the Patriots, Cheesey, the year Tom Brady went out in the first game.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

It is what it is.

"Cheesey" wrote:



[align=center]HOLY SHIT!!! It ... is what it ... is!!

NO FUCKING WAY!!![/align]


I just never thought of it like that. JUST SAYING!!!!
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
14 years ago
They should just put two more teams in as wild cards and make everyone play week 1. Division winners my ass. Both AFC and NFC West divisions are atrocious as is the AFC south. Pittsburgh and Baltimore get 4 gimme games a year with Cleveland and Cincinatti as does New England with Buffalo and Miami.
UserPostedImage
rabidgopher04
14 years ago

It is what it is.
Is it fair? I really think it is. If you are "lucky" enough to be in a weak division, you have a chance to make the playoffs.
The Bears get the #2 seed with an 11-5 record. I never though 11-5 would get that position.
There was a team a few years back that went 11-5 and didn't even make the playoffs.
Tampa and NY finished 10-6 and didn't make it.
It is what it is.

"Cheesey" wrote:



I disagree. It isn't what it is. It can change and should as described in the article above. For instance, without re-seeding, when the Packers beat the Eagles on Sunday they will then play the Falcons in the divisional round, then potentially the Bears, Saints, or Rams/Seahawks in the NFC Championship. Worst of all, the Packers would have to travel to St. Louis or Seattle in this instance even though the Packers have the better record. It seems to me that the Bears and Packers should be meeting up in the divisional round. It's all screwy with a super weak division like the NFC West.
Amazing Bacon Delivery  Service! Never be without good bacon again.
musccy
14 years ago
If you re-seeded based on record (and assume head-head would be first tiebreaker) NO would host Sea, and GB would host Phil.

I was rooting for Sea tonight because it takes a squeaky wheel to break out the oil, and a 7-9 team that is 3-10 when playing outside of their division that was collectively outscored by 327 points this year should emit a pretty loud squeak!
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (9h) : Both LB Quay Walker and Rookie DB Micah Robinson have passed their physicals
    Zero2Cool (9h) : Happy to see site feels more snappy snappy
    Zero2Cool (9h) : No sir. I did not.
    dfosterf (10h) : You didn't get free childcare when you were at work?
    wpr (10h) : These guys make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Pay for their own childcare.
    dfosterf (12h) : 2nd issue. Number 1 issue was no gameday childcare. 1 of 3 teams not providing it
    Zero2Cool (12h) : Suppose if locker room is main issue, we sitting pretty
    wpr (12h) : I thought so Mucky. In those useless player polls GB always rates high overall. Locker is a part of it.
    Mucky Tundra (12h) : Wasn't the locker room just updated like 6 or 7 years ago?
    Zero2Cool (13h) : I have forum updated on different site. We'll see how this one goes before going to that
    Zero2Cool (14h) : Elgton Jenkins has a back injury, is expect to end contract dispute
    wpr (16h) : It's funny the PA complained about the locker room. It wasn't that long ago it was top shelf. Things change in a hurry.
    wpr (16h) : The site is much more better.
    Zero2Cool (16h) : NFLPA report said Packers lockerroom needed upgrade. Whining bout where you change?
    Zero2Cool (16h) : I saw that and thought it was kind of lame.
    dfosterf (16h) : Packers new locker room is pretty awesome. Great for morale, imo
    Zero2Cool (17h) : Shuffled things on the web server. Hope it makes it faster.
    Zero2Cool (17h) : Other times, it's turtle ass
    Zero2Cool (17h) : Sometimes it's snappy, like now.
    beast (18h) : I feel like it's loading at the top of the next minute, or something like that.
    beast (18h) : Also the thanks/heart takes FOREVER to load, and posting in the shout box takes three times FOREVER!
    beast (18h) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
    beast (18h) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
    Zero2Cool (18h) : Yeah, I noticed that too. Is it slow for PackerPeople.com too?
    wpr (18h) : I don't know what you IT guys call it but the page loading is very slow for me today.
    Zero2Cool (19h) : SSL might be settled now.
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Still working through SSL cert issues
    wpr (23-Jul) : Glad to be back
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I think PH original finally working.
    dfosterf (22-Jul) : Can tell you are having a fun day Kev
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Yep, I had to manually move them. It'll fix itself after more posts.
    Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Same deal with the songs/videos thread, says you replied last but when I go there it's what I posted earlier is last
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : I had to manually move three posts.
    Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : But when I go it, Martha's is the last reply
    Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Still a little screwy; it shows on the main forum that you were the last person to reply to the Jenkins trade thread
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Host issues, been crazy day
    Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Connect 4?
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Connecting to new database
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : What the hell
    beast (22-Jul) : Packershome going to the Whiteout unis again
    Zero2Cool (21-Jul) : Oh wait, they got Cam Ward. 1st overall right? haha oops
    Zero2Cool (21-Jul) : They could send Packers a 1st for a QB they are familiar with
    Zero2Cool (21-Jul) : Titans QB Will Levis to have season-ending shoulder surgery
    Zero2Cool (19-Jul) : Their season did kind of start there, so 🤷
    dfosterf (19-Jul) : Eagles put an engraved Brazil flag on their super bowl rings
    Zero2Cool (18-Jul) : Benton unsigned no more
    Zero2Cool (17-Jul) : That's good analysis, yes you are getting old. It'd a blessing!
    dfosterf (14-Jul) : *analysis* gettin' old
    dfosterf (14-Jul) : One of the best analyisis I"ve ever watched at this time of an offseason
    dfosterf (14-Jul) : Andy Herman interviewed Warren Sharp on his Pack a day podcast
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    1h / Around The NFL / beast

    2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    4h / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

    7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    15-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.