Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago

It's Time for the NFL To Re-Seed the Postseason 
By Daniel Bartemus
(Contributor) on December 30, 2010

[img_r]http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/images_root/images/photos/001/099/941/98676822_crop_340x234.jpg?1293743060[/img_r]The Miami Dolphins, Minnesota Vikings, Washington Redskins, San Diego Chargers, Oakland Raiders and Tennessee Titans must be green with envy.

The New York Giants and Tampa Bay Buccaneers will likely be seeing red come Sunday night.

The top list consists of teams whose records range from 6-9 to 8-7 and were either eliminated from playoff contention last weekend or have been for weeks. If this group played in the NFC West, each would be playing for a playoff spot in Week 17.

The Giants and Buccaneers both sit at 9-6 and need to win their finale and get help to reach the postseason. If either played in the NFC West, they could sit their starters this weekend because they would already be division champions. Instead, both are likely to be sitting at home watching the playoffs despite having a better record than the West champion.

Sunday nights game between the Seattle Seahawks and St. Louis Rams should be meaningless. Seattle is 6-9 and the Rams are 7-8, yet the winner will be wearing "NFC West Champions 2010" t-shirts and dancing around at midfield.

The NFL, which bans everything from touchdown celebrations to wearing funny looking socks, should also disallow any type of postgame celebration. It should be deemed an excessive and fine-able offense.

Not only are we going to be stuck watching one of these teams play on Wild Card Weekend, but the winner is going to be hosting a playoff game. That means the defending Super Bowl champion New Orleans Saints are likely going to have to get on a plane and travel to St. Louis or Seattle, despite the fact that they will have finished with four or five more wins.

I pity the Giants and Bucs because both are playoff-caliber, but this isnt the first time a potential wild card team had a better record than a division winner only to be left out of the postseason party, and it wont be the last. The NFL cant do away with its divisions for various obvious reasons, but it needs to look into ways to make the playoff format more fair and balanced.

Here are two of the simplest suggestions: re-seed the participants based on record, or keep the seeding the same, but let the team with the better record host the game.

The NBA adopted the latter method a few years ago after running into the same problem. This way works for both sides because the "division champion" label means nothing, rewarding the team with the better record, and the league doesnt have to go through the trouble of re-seeding every round.

However, the NBA has taken a liking to using Band-Aids to cover up more serious wounds when all observers can see stitches should be applied. The NFL, and the NBA for that matter, should swallow its pride and re-seed.

Not only will this give each team the seed it deserves based on record, God forbid, but this method makes it more likely that the best teams are going to be playing the longest in the postseason. This will maximize the NFL product and its certainly what the fans want, so why is the league so hesitant? There are zero negatives to re-seeding, other then division winners will no longer be guaranteed to host a playoff game.

Hosting a playoff game is a big deal because home field advantage is a big deal, especially in the playoffs. Shouldnt it be given to the teams with the best records, not the team that won the worst division possibly in NFL history with a LOSING RECORD?! And how long would it take for the league to re-seed its playoff teams? Five minutes? Please, dont strain yourselves.

If the playoffs started this weekend, here is how the NFC bracket would look:

1. Atlanta Falcons: 12-3

2. Chicago Bears: 11-4

3. Philadelphia Eagles: 10-5

4. St. Louis Rams: 7-8

5. New Orleans Saints: 11-4

6. Green Bay Packers: 9-6

To eliminate any confusion, Ill spell out why this is flawed. In the wild card round, the Eagles would host the Packers, and the Rams would host the Saints. Theres really only one injustice in this round because if it were re-seeded, the Eagles would move down to No. 4, while the Packers move up to No. 5, meaning Philadelphia would still host Green Bay in the first round.

The current issue is, obviously, the Rams getting the four spot, which could cost the Saints. First, as previously stated, they have to play on the road in the first round but, assuming they win, the second round is where New Orleans could really get shafted.

If the Eagles protect home field against Green Bay, that would mean the Saints travel to Atlanta to play the top seeded Falcons in the divisional playoffs, while the Eagles go to Chicago to face the Bears.

There are two problems here. First, New Orleans is tied for the second best record in the conference, yet theyre playing a second road game in as many weeks, and have to play the top seed in the second round, when records and the eye test show that the Saints and Falcons should be playing for the NFC Championship.

Secondly, New Orleans has a better record than Philadelphia but would be playing a harder opponent in the second round, meaning the Saints got a raw deal in each of the first two rounds. First, a road game; second, they facing longer odds to advance to a second consecutive NFC Championship Game.

If the bracket was re-seeded, the Saints would move to No. 3 and St. Louis would get bumped to No. 6. In this scenario, New Orleans would rightfully play host to the Rams, and if both the Saints and Eagles won, New Orleans would go to Chicago and Philadelphia would travel to Atlanta, entirely fixing the defect in the current system.

In the end, the only thing that re-seeding really changed for the opening round was the host city in one matchup, but as you can see, that one switch could potentially make a world of difference later on in the postseason.

Because Commissioner Roger Goodell does everything in his mighty power to keep the few deficiencies of his league tightly concealed, its a wonder that hes allowing NBC to flex this game into the Sunday primetime slot for all the world to see.

On the surface its a celebration of mediocrity, but so much more lies beneath. The NFL needs to make some changes and thats why a lockout seems imminent.

Hopefully Sunday nights game and eventual winner will force the league to reconsider its seriously flawed playoff format.


For more, visit my website www.pointbartemus.com, a sports forum.


UserPostedImage
Packers_Finland
13 years ago
Stop bitching. Unless a .500 team makes into the playoffs I'm satisfied. If Seattle wins, re-seed, if not, don't.
This is a placeholder
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago
Pedant's point: Technically, if the Rams win, won't they be a .500 team?


(Oh, and I'd rather have the emphasis on divisional representation with an occasional .500 or below winner getting in, than just go by straight winning percentage.)
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
Rams would be .500 if they win.
Seahwaks would be sub .500 if they win.



I'd rather the best four records get a home game but then again I think winning the division of four teams is pretty weak.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
13 years ago
It is what it is.
Is it fair? I really think it is. If you are "lucky" enough to be in a weak division, you have a chance to make the playoffs.
The Bears get the #2 seed with an 11-5 record. I never though 11-5 would get that position.
There was a team a few years back that went 11-5 and didn't even make the playoffs.
Tampa and NY finished 10-6 and didn't make it.
It is what it is.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
I think you're referring to the Patriots, Cheesey, the year Tom Brady went out in the first game.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

It is what it is.

"Cheesey" wrote:



[align=center]HOLY SHIT!!! It ... is what it ... is!!

NO FUCKING WAY!!![/align]


I just never thought of it like that. JUST SAYING!!!!
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
13 years ago
They should just put two more teams in as wild cards and make everyone play week 1. Division winners my ass. Both AFC and NFC West divisions are atrocious as is the AFC south. Pittsburgh and Baltimore get 4 gimme games a year with Cleveland and Cincinatti as does New England with Buffalo and Miami.
UserPostedImage
rabidgopher04
13 years ago

It is what it is.
Is it fair? I really think it is. If you are "lucky" enough to be in a weak division, you have a chance to make the playoffs.
The Bears get the #2 seed with an 11-5 record. I never though 11-5 would get that position.
There was a team a few years back that went 11-5 and didn't even make the playoffs.
Tampa and NY finished 10-6 and didn't make it.
It is what it is.

"Cheesey" wrote:



I disagree. It isn't what it is. It can change and should as described in the article above. For instance, without re-seeding, when the Packers beat the Eagles on Sunday they will then play the Falcons in the divisional round, then potentially the Bears, Saints, or Rams/Seahawks in the NFC Championship. Worst of all, the Packers would have to travel to St. Louis or Seattle in this instance even though the Packers have the better record. It seems to me that the Bears and Packers should be meeting up in the divisional round. It's all screwy with a super weak division like the NFC West.
Amazing Bacon Delivery  Service! Never be without good bacon again.
musccy
13 years ago
If you re-seeded based on record (and assume head-head would be first tiebreaker) NO would host Sea, and GB would host Phil.

I was rooting for Sea tonight because it takes a squeaky wheel to break out the oil, and a 7-9 team that is 3-10 when playing outside of their division that was collectively outscored by 327 points this year should emit a pretty loud squeak!
Fan Shout
beast (7h) : In other news, the Green Bay Packers have signed Zero2Cool to update their website 😋 jk
beast (10h) : Might just re-sign the kicker we got
beast (10h) : Are there any kickers worth drafting next year?
Zero2Cool (10h) : Preston Smith for Malik Willis
Mucky Tundra (10h) : Getting a 7th rounder from the Stillers
Zero2Cool (10h) : At least we get 7th round pick now!! HELLO NEW KICKER
Mucky Tundra (10h) : Steelers getting a premier lockdown corner!
Zero2Cool (10h) : Packers are trading edge rusher Preston Smith to the Pittsburgh Steelers, per sources.
Mucky Tundra (10h) : Preston Smith traded to the Steelers!!!!
Zero2Cool (11h) : CB Marshon Lattimore to Commanders
Zero2Cool (16h) : Bears are sending RB Khalil Herbert to the Bengals, per sources.
Zero2Cool (16h) : ZaDarius Smith continues his "north" tour.
Zero2Cool (17h) : Let the Chiefs trade a 5th for him
Zero2Cool (17h) : Nearing 30, large contract, nope.
Martha Careful (5-Nov) : any interest in Marshon Lattimore?
Zero2Cool (4-Nov) : What does NFL do if they're over cap?
Mucky Tundra (4-Nov) : They've been able to constantly push it out through extensions, void years etc but they're in the hole by 72 million next year I believe
hardrocker950 (4-Nov) : Seems the Saints are always in cap hell
Mucky Tundra (4-Nov) : Saints HC job is not an envious one; gonna be in cap hell for 3 years
Mucky Tundra (4-Nov) : Dennis Allen has now been fired twice mid-season with Derek Carr as his starting QB
Zero2Cool (4-Nov) : Kuhn let go
beast (4-Nov) : I wonder if the Packers would have any interest in Z. Smith, probably not
Zero2Cool (4-Nov) : Shefter says Browns and Lions will figure out how to get a deal done for Za'Darius Smith..
Zero2Cool (4-Nov) : Packers are more likely to have 1,000 yard rusher than 4,000 yard passer
Zero2Cool (3-Nov) : It's raining hard.
Zero2Cool (3-Nov) : Packers inactives vs. Lions: CB Jaire Alexander S Evan Williams C Josh Myers Non-injury inactives: WR Malik Heath OL Travis Glover DE Bren
packerfanoutwest (3-Nov) : Malik Willis: My focus is helping the Packers win, not proving I can start elsewhere. But he could
Zero2Cool (1-Nov) : I had Texans, but the loss of another WR flipped me
wpr (1-Nov) : I thought about taking the Jets but they've been a disaster. Losing to the Pats last week
Zero2Cool (1-Nov) : Surprised more didn't pick Jets in Pick'em.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

19h / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

5-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

5-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

5-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

5-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

4-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

4-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2-Nov / Around The NFL / wpr

1-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Nov / Around The NFL / beast

Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.