Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
A Marine giving advice to "join the Air Force".

Sorry, I just had to laugh.

Now I have to go out and tell some college students to be English majors.

:)
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
istanbulpacker
14 years ago



2. (I don't have any figures to back this up, so this is a gut feeling based on second hand observation with a historian's eye.) What percentage of the Army/Navy/Air Force enlistees that get past basic training will end up re-upping for 2 or more terms? What percentage of Marines who get past boot camp will? What percentage of each group will group will go career? What percentage will go "career soldier" rather than "career (insert job description here)? I would expect -- and again, I could be wrong -- that if one did a careful empirical investigation, you'd find the percentages rather different.

"Wade" wrote:



I'll take a stab at this. I don't have the figures but the Marine Personnel folks would. So would the recruiters. After all, this is their job. Here are my thoughts. The Marine Corps has a structure that requires X% Officers and Y% Enlisted. Each other service has their own ratio. Last I saw, Marines had a higher number of Enlisted to Officer (~8:1 ), then Navy & Army about the same (5.5:1), then Air Force where it is near 4:1. For each paygrade within the service, there is a target number of personnel they desire.

Why bring this up? Because the percentage of folks staying in or getting out is not based solely on the individual. If you don't promote, you may be forced out due to high year tenure. Put simply, either your career field is too overmanned or you suck enough that we don't need you anymore. Move along so we can let the next generation move up. It is referred to as "move up or move out." You may want to give your life to the Corps, but if you meet the criteria above, they'll say thank you for playing and away you go.

So what percentage will re-enlist for 2 or more terms. There is a given historical percentage that generally remains true. They use it to plan their future manning and decide where shortages are or will be. However, such things as recessions/economic downturns/high unemployment will cause retention numbers to rise as folks weigh the pros/cons of getting out vs. staying in. If unemployment was at an all time low and salaries were exponentially higher in the civilian world, one would expect the military to institute paying of higher reenlistment bonuses, etc to entice their experienced people to remain in. Either way, they need fewer people at higher paygrades so they DESIRE people to get out.

What I think your gut is telling you, though, is that the Marines have done a good job of promoting their institutional culture. That appeal is also then used as a retention tool. If you instill a value that you are part of a special elite (the few, the proud) and a family (once a Marine, always...), then that individual may choose to remain in for other than pecuniary rewards. This was the target of your first point, I believe. The appeal attracts a certain type of individual. Those that are swayed by it will continue to be. Those that aren't, may choose to serve their country in other ways.

Finally, I will say this about your point #2. Doesn't matter what service you choose or for how long you do it. Anyone who HAS served earns my respect provided they served honorably. Whether one chooses to remain for a career or gets out after their first commitment, they still did something that a majority of Americans have NOT done (military only 9% of the Gen Pop.) It's the service that counts, not the time served.

We need good people in the Army, Navy, Air Force and Coast Guard just as well. The job they all do is just as important. It all defends our freedoms and our country.

P.S. Are you aware that the Marine Corps organizationally belongs to the Department of the Navy as a subordinate unit? 😉 Navy Org Chart 
blank
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
I didn't mean to disparage those who served shorter terms. Not at all. Even if such a thing were valid, which I don't consider it, it wouldn't be valid coming from me, who has never served.

That's why I haven't attempted to give the OP any advice. That's not my place or my competence.

I really was just responding to the "recruiters lie" subthread.

My only point is really that if you're going to sell/recruit people a "career in X" you're going to recruit differently than if you're going to sell/recruit people seeking "a stepping stone for the future career". And that my impression (again, as a pure ousider) is that the marines both seek and attract those seeking the former more; and army/navy/etc, the latter more.

I wouldn't even argue that either approach is "wrong". While I personally admire Marines a bit more, because I consider them more likely to be "warriors" first, I'm convinced that modelling the entire US military (or its recruitment on the Marine Corp model) would be a disaster. (Sorry, Foster.)

A modern nation that asks its military to serve as wide a range of political/economics/culture needs more than warriors in it. And it needs more than Marines.

I just think that you can't lump all military recruiters/recruitment strategies and tactics together. Depending on the objectives being served by the recruiter (or sought by the potential recruit), lying might be a preferred approach sometimes.

But not always.


Hehe...and, yes, I know the Marines are part of the D of Navy. But my impression has always been that they recruit separately and target different recruits.

This is probably why they both wear silly pants.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
istanbulpacker
14 years ago
Wade,

Didn't think your intention was to disparage those who served shorter terms just as I didn't intend to disparage those who haven't served. I was just lumping in my own opinions in the same post as I replied to one of your comments.

Since I sort of started the "recruiters lie" theme, though, I will still stand by that. It is an old saw. Sure, not all recruiters are devious just like all cops in the US aren't assholes (a previous post). However, there is a kernel of truth to each and it comes from the collective experiences of many people being burned.

Let us not forget that the job of a recruiter is to recruit. His performance is evaluated based on how well he meets monthly quotas (or, to be P.C., "goals"). We recognize that asking police officers to write X number of tickets per month doesn't equate to good governance and doesn't help them do their mission. They feel pressured to write tickets in B.S. situations to keep their job/performance if it has been a slow month. Same thing applies here, I imagine. Slow month....get a kid who is interested, sell him some half-truths and get him to sign.

I think what NSD and I were trying to say is this:
Understand EXACTLY what it is you are undertaking and what you are giving up to do so. Ensure that your reasons/needs/desires for entering into this contract are met before you sign because you aren't getting anything after the deal. Unlike the NFLPA, there is no contract re-negotiation for performance and there are no union strikes in the military...unless you are European 😉
blank
Fan Shout
jdlax (1h) : I can't believe one of my teams went out and wablammo just up and acquired one of the best players in the world overnight
dfosterf (6h) : I do very much appreciate when Beast and others pick up my slack 😊
dfosterf (6h) : I accept Beast's admonishment regarding my failure to link stuff I reference. I simply never learned to link from my cell phone.
beast (6h) : That's not what your she said 😌, she said keep going 😏
Mucky Tundra (9h) : Anything over 4 hours means he needs to get to the hospital
Mucky Tundra (9h) : Someone might want to check on Hafley and make sure his erection has gone down
Zero2Cool (11h) : LaFleur texts "bleep me I cannot sit down"
Zero2Cool (11h) : YouTube has had me last hour or two lol
Mucky Tundra (11h) : Ugh this trade happened right as my shift started and it's killing me
Zero2Cool (11h) : Parsons wore 23 in high school.
Zero2Cool (12h) : Packers just cost Lions more money with Hutchinson too huh
Zero2Cool (13h) : That is fair by me.
buckeyepackfan (13h) : Kenny Clark is the player, 2 1st rnd picks
Zero2Cool (13h) : umm... what?
wpr (13h) : I am stunned
Mucky Tundra (13h) : RICKEY SCOOPS WAS RIGHT AGAIN!!!
Mucky Tundra (13h) : ITS HAPPENING
buckeyepackfan (13h) : DEAL IS DONE
buckeyepackfan (13h) : MICAH IS COMING TO GREEN BAY!!!!!!!!!
wpr (20h) : Me do-ed it gooderly,
Zero2Cool (28-Aug) : Bahah, I was like WTF why isn't anyone posting on PP.com ... oops no one has permissions
dfosterf (27-Aug) : tell her I reckon
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Micah Robinson cut. Probable PS player tomorrow. Has to call mom back and t
Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : New site so much better. Might make switch and deal with it.
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Mecole Hardman to our practice squad
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Nick Nieman from Texans our 5th linebacker. Special teams signing
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Looks like we signed Clayton Tune as QB3
wpr (27-Aug) : TKT people lose their minds over QB3. Point is almost none of them are ready that's why they are on the PS and other teams don't take them.
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Unfortunately he doesn't seem ready to be an emergency QB.
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : As a Canadian and a follower of Canadian University football. I am rooting for him
dfosterf (27-Aug) : I bet a lot of us will follow the Taylor Elgersma journey with interest. Personally, got a Kurt Warner vibe goin' on. I like him
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Not sure if either will be claimed though.
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Tune or Hooker would make sense
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Clayton Tune cut by the Cards? Don't know if that's the guy, we shall see
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Per Bill Huber, the Packers will not be bringing back Taylor Elgersma or Sean Clifford on the practice squad, so a new third quarterback
Mucky Tundra (27-Aug) : Schefter must have deleted his tweet
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Hopefully Jerry reaches under the seat cushions and ashtrays of his jet and scrapes up the 45 million apr and spares us further nonsense
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Have to admit the PO'd Cowboy fan videos would be fun to watch. Problem with draft picks is half their fanbase barely knows what that is
beast (27-Aug) : I think Cowboys fans are ready to get their pitch forks and burning sticks if Jerry were to trade Micah
dfosterf (27-Aug) : If Jerry traded Micah to GB, here in northern Va. they would have to quick build yet another data center to handle the internet hate traffic
Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : its signing and trades that you don't hear about, other then announced
Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : If you hear rumors about Packers sign or trade, won't happen. Not how they work
dfosterf (27-Aug) : 19 players in a contract year. Jones called loss to us worst loss in Cowboy history. Forget Parsons trade. Not happenin' Cap'n
packerfanoutwest (27-Aug) : The Packers, meanwhile, are the youngest team in the league for the third consecutive year.
dfosterf (27-Aug) : That it was darkest before the dawn in Bengals and Commanders before they got deals done
Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : what is Schefter saying?
dfosterf (27-Aug) : He was getting Dorito infusion therapy
dfosterf (27-Aug) : He's outta shape. Why, just the other day I saw him splayed out on the trainers table
Mucky Tundra (27-Aug) : Parsons has followed Rasheed Walker on Twitter. Quite the choice
Mucky Tundra (27-Aug) : Kuhn is a former player who works for the team, if somethings going down, he would be close to it
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / jdlax

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

28-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

27-Aug / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

27-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

27-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

26-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

25-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

24-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.