Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
A Marine giving advice to "join the Air Force".

Sorry, I just had to laugh.

Now I have to go out and tell some college students to be English majors.

:)
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
istanbulpacker
14 years ago



2. (I don't have any figures to back this up, so this is a gut feeling based on second hand observation with a historian's eye.) What percentage of the Army/Navy/Air Force enlistees that get past basic training will end up re-upping for 2 or more terms? What percentage of Marines who get past boot camp will? What percentage of each group will group will go career? What percentage will go "career soldier" rather than "career (insert job description here)? I would expect -- and again, I could be wrong -- that if one did a careful empirical investigation, you'd find the percentages rather different.

"Wade" wrote:



I'll take a stab at this. I don't have the figures but the Marine Personnel folks would. So would the recruiters. After all, this is their job. Here are my thoughts. The Marine Corps has a structure that requires X% Officers and Y% Enlisted. Each other service has their own ratio. Last I saw, Marines had a higher number of Enlisted to Officer (~8:1 ), then Navy & Army about the same (5.5:1), then Air Force where it is near 4:1. For each paygrade within the service, there is a target number of personnel they desire.

Why bring this up? Because the percentage of folks staying in or getting out is not based solely on the individual. If you don't promote, you may be forced out due to high year tenure. Put simply, either your career field is too overmanned or you suck enough that we don't need you anymore. Move along so we can let the next generation move up. It is referred to as "move up or move out." You may want to give your life to the Corps, but if you meet the criteria above, they'll say thank you for playing and away you go.

So what percentage will re-enlist for 2 or more terms. There is a given historical percentage that generally remains true. They use it to plan their future manning and decide where shortages are or will be. However, such things as recessions/economic downturns/high unemployment will cause retention numbers to rise as folks weigh the pros/cons of getting out vs. staying in. If unemployment was at an all time low and salaries were exponentially higher in the civilian world, one would expect the military to institute paying of higher reenlistment bonuses, etc to entice their experienced people to remain in. Either way, they need fewer people at higher paygrades so they DESIRE people to get out.

What I think your gut is telling you, though, is that the Marines have done a good job of promoting their institutional culture. That appeal is also then used as a retention tool. If you instill a value that you are part of a special elite (the few, the proud) and a family (once a Marine, always...), then that individual may choose to remain in for other than pecuniary rewards. This was the target of your first point, I believe. The appeal attracts a certain type of individual. Those that are swayed by it will continue to be. Those that aren't, may choose to serve their country in other ways.

Finally, I will say this about your point #2. Doesn't matter what service you choose or for how long you do it. Anyone who HAS served earns my respect provided they served honorably. Whether one chooses to remain for a career or gets out after their first commitment, they still did something that a majority of Americans have NOT done (military only 9% of the Gen Pop.) It's the service that counts, not the time served.

We need good people in the Army, Navy, Air Force and Coast Guard just as well. The job they all do is just as important. It all defends our freedoms and our country.

P.S. Are you aware that the Marine Corps organizationally belongs to the Department of the Navy as a subordinate unit? 😉 Navy Org Chart 
blank
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
I didn't mean to disparage those who served shorter terms. Not at all. Even if such a thing were valid, which I don't consider it, it wouldn't be valid coming from me, who has never served.

That's why I haven't attempted to give the OP any advice. That's not my place or my competence.

I really was just responding to the "recruiters lie" subthread.

My only point is really that if you're going to sell/recruit people a "career in X" you're going to recruit differently than if you're going to sell/recruit people seeking "a stepping stone for the future career". And that my impression (again, as a pure ousider) is that the marines both seek and attract those seeking the former more; and army/navy/etc, the latter more.

I wouldn't even argue that either approach is "wrong". While I personally admire Marines a bit more, because I consider them more likely to be "warriors" first, I'm convinced that modelling the entire US military (or its recruitment on the Marine Corp model) would be a disaster. (Sorry, Foster.)

A modern nation that asks its military to serve as wide a range of political/economics/culture needs more than warriors in it. And it needs more than Marines.

I just think that you can't lump all military recruiters/recruitment strategies and tactics together. Depending on the objectives being served by the recruiter (or sought by the potential recruit), lying might be a preferred approach sometimes.

But not always.


Hehe...and, yes, I know the Marines are part of the D of Navy. But my impression has always been that they recruit separately and target different recruits.

This is probably why they both wear silly pants.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
istanbulpacker
14 years ago
Wade,

Didn't think your intention was to disparage those who served shorter terms just as I didn't intend to disparage those who haven't served. I was just lumping in my own opinions in the same post as I replied to one of your comments.

Since I sort of started the "recruiters lie" theme, though, I will still stand by that. It is an old saw. Sure, not all recruiters are devious just like all cops in the US aren't assholes (a previous post). However, there is a kernel of truth to each and it comes from the collective experiences of many people being burned.

Let us not forget that the job of a recruiter is to recruit. His performance is evaluated based on how well he meets monthly quotas (or, to be P.C., "goals"). We recognize that asking police officers to write X number of tickets per month doesn't equate to good governance and doesn't help them do their mission. They feel pressured to write tickets in B.S. situations to keep their job/performance if it has been a slow month. Same thing applies here, I imagine. Slow month....get a kid who is interested, sell him some half-truths and get him to sign.

I think what NSD and I were trying to say is this:
Understand EXACTLY what it is you are undertaking and what you are giving up to do so. Ensure that your reasons/needs/desires for entering into this contract are met before you sign because you aren't getting anything after the deal. Unlike the NFLPA, there is no contract re-negotiation for performance and there are no union strikes in the military...unless you are European 😉
blank
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (8h) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
Mucky Tundra (8h) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
Mucky Tundra (8h) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
dfosterf (14-Jun) : TWO magnificent strikes for touchdowns. Lose the pennstate semigeezer non nfl backup
dfosterf (14-Jun) : There was minicamp Thursday. My man Taylor Engersma threw
dfosterf (11-Jun) : There will be a mini camp practice Thursday.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : He's been sporting a ring for a while now. It's probably Madonna.
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : We only do the tea before whoopee, it relaxes me.
wpr (10-Jun) : That's awesome Martha.
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : How's the ayahuasca tea he makes, Martha?
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : Turns out he like older women
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : I wasn't supposed to say anything, but yes the word is out and we are happy 😂😂😂
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : I might be late on this but Aaron Rodgers is now married
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : Well he can always ask his brother for pointers
Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : Bo Melton taking some reps at CB as well as WR
Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : key transactions coming today at 3pm that will consume more cap in 2025
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Jaire played in just 34 of a possible 68 games since the start of the 2021 season
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
8h / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Jun / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Jun / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

15-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

14-Jun / Around The NFL / beast

14-Jun / Community Welcome! / dfosterf

13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.