I don't understand how that correlates to Flynn's and Rodgers performances.

---

Rodgers rating for Lions game, 34.65.

Say Jennings catches that ball and gets tackled immediately at the 30, Rodgers rating would then be, 88.82.

If's and But's ....

---

Personally, I think Green Bay's offense has one fatal flaw. If you pressure them with your front four, they're done.

That is how the Vikings had success against the Packers last year. That is how Cincinnati did in that very same season. Detroit did it today. The Packers have proven they can survive without a running game. They can even survive when the blitz works. However, when you play coverage and get pressure, there is no way the Packers can counter that. I know you can say that about almost any team, but others have the ability to adjust. The Packers really don't.

This is probably the toughest regular season loss to endure in McCarthy's coaching career. Well, when you consider the circumstances of the standings.

---

Could it be more or less he was referring to the injury prone label?

Can you show us how you come to that?

Can you show us how you come to that?

I have a formula, but to late for me to figure it out lol

http://www.baseball-statistics.com/Greats/Century/passer-rating.htm#math 

* edit*

NM found this


http://www.csgnetwork.com/quarterbackratecalc.html 

Had 46 yards + the 53 if Jennings goes down at the 30...

8 out of 11 for 91 yards no td no int

101 rating

7 of 11 for 46 yards 0 td 1 int = 34.65 rating
8 of 11 for 89 yards 0 td 0 int = 96.40 rating

Packers were on the 27. 23 yards to the 50.

The ball hit Jenning in his hands around 35 and if he falls down right away and tackled he lands no sooner than the 30 which is 20 less from the 50.

23 + 20 = 43 yard reception added to Rodgers 46 = 89

The interception can be seen HERE .

The QB Calculator I used is HERE .




It also puts his completion percentage from 63.6% to 72.7% if Jennings catches it.


If Jennings catches it and scores, tack on 73 yards to the 46 and add a TD and his rating is something like 138.0.




But as I said, ifs buts and thats. I'm just trying to add to the statement that Rodgers did not play bad. Someone said Rodgers didn't have much better luck than Flynn, implying Rodgers wasn't doing good. He was.


I'm tired from doing the playoff scenarios, so if you don't like wehat I posted, do the damn research yourself, lazy ass. :twisted:

---

ty..

Got my adding wrong, in the dark (no calculator) and on pain pills for my back..Doesnt help my math at all lol

Then I found the calculator and entered the math..

Pretty odd you and I found diff calculators for p/r

I still am looking at the numbers I posted and questioning if I added correctly.

---