DanJustDan29
14 years ago
[youtube]JNhTNGC9vTo[/youtube]
Teamwork is what the Green Bay Packers were all about. They didn't do it for individual glory. They did it because they loved one another. -Vince Lombardi
all_about_da_packers
14 years ago

The problem with those plays on the goal line is that we cannot just punch it in. Lombardi would call a sweep. Everyone in America would know what was coming, but no one could stop it. Not so with this team.

"nerdmann" wrote:



Interesting to hear Rodgers comment on why he checked into the goal line run - said it was the exact look that Miami gave them when they used it before, and he thought he could catch them off guard.

I was pretty appalled with going for it at the 1 the second play by calling Rodgers number again. However, someone pointed out on another site - and I think it has merit - that those are the situations you use your best RB to punch the ball in. Rodgers was our best back in that game, so McCarthy decided to try to punch it in with him. If that is the case, I think that speaks volumes about the lack of faith McCarthy has in our RBs. I can't blame him since B-Jack is hardly a special or gritty runner.

You're not going to have the chance to let routes develop at the 1 yard line; teams go exclusively press and WRs can only do so much when they have a very limited amount of space to try and get free in. So I'm not sure I disagree with the call - although I think it speaks volumes about how Ted has short-changed this team at RB after Grant. I, frankly, can't come up with a better call to punch the ball in from the 1 given our top RB was ineffective and the 2nd man behind him left the game with a concussion earlier.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Cheesey
14 years ago
Well, as i said in another thread, WHY DID THEY KICK IT DEEP AT THE END???
You SQIB kick it, to prevent a big return.
Stupid, if you ask me.
UserPostedImage
Greg C.
14 years ago

Well, as i said in another thread, WHY DID THEY KICK IT DEEP AT THE END???
You SQIB kick it, to prevent a big return.
Stupid, if you ask me.

"Cheesey" wrote:



I've seen squib kicks blow up in teams' faces in that situation, giving the oponent a short field to set up a field goal drive. Usually a squib kick gives them the ball around the 35-40 yard line. With a conventional kickoff, the other team will usually start around the 28 yard line. Atlanta does not have a great kick returner, and they had done nothing on kick returns all day. McCarthy was just playing the percentages. I wouldn't have tried a squib kick unless there was much less time on the clock--say, time for only two or three more plays.
blank
Stevetarded
14 years ago
You squib if the other team needs a td not a fg
blank
yooperfan
14 years ago
Our strong legged kicker should have been able to blast it right out of the endzone in a dome.
Something wrong with him?
mi_keys
14 years ago

The problem with those plays on the goal line is that we cannot just punch it in. Lombardi would call a sweep. Everyone in America would know what was coming, but no one could stop it. Not so with this team.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



Interesting to hear Rodgers comment on why he checked into the goal line run - said it was the exact look that Miami gave them when they used it before, and he thought he could catch them off guard.

I was pretty appalled with going for it at the 1 the second play by calling Rodgers number again. However, someone pointed out on another site - and I think it has merit - that those are the situations you use your best RB to punch the ball in. Rodgers was our best back in that game, so McCarthy decided to try to punch it in with him. If that is the case, I think that speaks volumes about the lack of faith McCarthy has in our RBs. I can't blame him since B-Jack is hardly a special or gritty runner.

You're not going to have the chance to let routes develop at the 1 yard line; teams go exclusively press and WRs can only do so much when they have a very limited amount of space to try and get free in. So I'm not sure I disagree with the call - although I think it speaks volumes about how Ted has short-changed this team at RB after Grant. I, frankly, can't come up with a better call to punch the ball in from the 1 given our top RB was ineffective and the 2nd man behind him left the game with a concussion earlier.

"nerdmann" wrote:



That was exactly my thought on the first Rodgers sneak, that it was exactly the same thing they did against Miami which they converted easily.

What I think is even more embarrassing about that series and other series we've had is that our offensive line never once gets any push when all we need is 1 yard. Yeah the running back performance is awful but just once could you maybe push the defense back half a yard? It's pathetic.
Born and bred a cheesehead
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago

I, frankly, can't come up with a better call to punch the ball in from the 1 given our top RB was ineffective and the 2nd man behind him left the game with a concussion earlier.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



We have perhaps the best red-zone passing quarterback in the league. Why not give him a chance to throw a touchdown? Atlanta was clogging the middle of the line -- the corners of the end zone would have been wide open.
UserPostedImage
Scottish_Packer
14 years ago
What hurts is seeing another close game go to the other team. We were good though, but Atlanta didn't really slip up and deserved the win.

Tough losses against great teams let you know where you need to elevate your play to.
UserPostedImage
warhawk
14 years ago

The problem with those plays on the goal line is that we cannot just punch it in. Lombardi would call a sweep. Everyone in America would know what was coming, but no one could stop it. Not so with this team.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



Interesting to hear Rodgers comment on why he checked into the goal line run - said it was the exact look that Miami gave them when they used it before, and he thought he could catch them off guard.

I was pretty appalled with going for it at the 1 the second play by calling Rodgers number again. However, someone pointed out on another site - and I think it has merit - that those are the situations you use your best RB to punch the ball in. Rodgers was our best back in that game, so McCarthy decided to try to punch it in with him. If that is the case, I think that speaks volumes about the lack of faith McCarthy has in our RBs. I can't blame him since B-Jack is hardly a special or gritty runner.

You're not going to have the chance to let routes develop at the 1 yard line; teams go exclusively press and WRs can only do so much when they have a very limited amount of space to try and get free in. So I'm not sure I disagree with the call - although I think it speaks volumes about how Ted has short-changed this team at RB after Grant. I, frankly, can't come up with a better call to punch the ball in from the 1 given our top RB was ineffective and the 2nd man behind him left the game with a concussion earlier.

"nerdmann" wrote:



The first sneak was an audible by Rodgers and the second one McCarthy said he tried to get a timeout so he could change the play and didn't get it. Little things like that and the 4th down drop we missed that should have been challenged really changed the outcome of the game.

The way this game went fell right into the hands of the Falcons. They got a couple of long drives, never used any hurry-up offense and it seemed like we started from our own 10 every damn time. We moved the ball almost every time we had it but had so far to go and it took so long we didn't get the number chances we really needed.
"The train is leaving the station."
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (3h) : QB coach Sean Mannion
Zero2Cool (3h) : DL Coach DeMarcus Covington
dfosterf (5h) : from ft Belvoir, Quantico and points south. Somber reminder of this tragedy at Reagan Nat Airport
dfosterf (5h) : So eerily quiet here in Alexandria. I live in the flight path of commercial craft coming from the south and west, plus the military craft
dfosterf (6h) : So eeri
Mucky Tundra (9h) : Now that's a thought, maybe they're looking at the college ranks? Maybe not head coaches but DC/assistant DCs with league experience?
beast (10h) : College Coaches wouldn't want that publicly, as it would hurt recruiting and they might not get the job.
beast (10h) : I thought they were supposed to publicly announce them, at least the NFL ones. Hafley was from college, so I believe different rules.
Mucky Tundra (10h) : Who knows who they're interviewing? I mean, nobody knew about Hafley and then out of nowhere he was hired
beast (13h) : I wonder what's taking so long with hiring a DL coach, 2 of the 3 known to interview have already been hired elsewhere.
Zero2Cool (27-Jan) : Packers coach Matt LaFleur hires Luke Getsy as senior assistant, extends Rich Bisaccia's deal
Zero2Cool (27-Jan) : Chiefs again huh? I guess another Super Bowl I'll be finding something else to do.
Mucky Tundra (27-Jan) : Chiefs Eagles...again...sigh
dfosterf (27-Jan) : Happy Birthday Dave!
Mucky Tundra (27-Jan) : happy birthday dhazer
TheKanataThrilla (26-Jan) : Exactly buck...Washington came up with the ball. It is just a shitty coincidence one week later
buckeyepackfan (26-Jan) : I forgot, they corrected the call a week later. Lol btw HAPPY BIRTHDAY dhazer!
buckeyepackfan (26-Jan) : That brings up the question, why wasn't Nixon down by contact? I think that was the point Kanata was making.
buckeyepackfan (26-Jan) : Turnovers rule, win the turnover battle, win the game.
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : well, he was
TheKanataThrilla (26-Jan) : Eagles down by contact on the fumble....fuck you NFL
Mucky Tundra (26-Jan) : I think this games over
beast (26-Jan) : Eagles sure get a lot of fumbles on kickoffs
Mucky Tundra (26-Jan) : This game looks too big for Washington
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,
beast (26-Jan) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)
beast (26-Jan) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab
Zero2Cool (25-Jan) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

27-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

25-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.