DanJustDan29
13 years ago
[youtube]JNhTNGC9vTo[/youtube]
Teamwork is what the Green Bay Packers were all about. They didn't do it for individual glory. They did it because they loved one another. -Vince Lombardi
all_about_da_packers
13 years ago

The problem with those plays on the goal line is that we cannot just punch it in. Lombardi would call a sweep. Everyone in America would know what was coming, but no one could stop it. Not so with this team.

"nerdmann" wrote:



Interesting to hear Rodgers comment on why he checked into the goal line run - said it was the exact look that Miami gave them when they used it before, and he thought he could catch them off guard.

I was pretty appalled with going for it at the 1 the second play by calling Rodgers number again. However, someone pointed out on another site - and I think it has merit - that those are the situations you use your best RB to punch the ball in. Rodgers was our best back in that game, so McCarthy decided to try to punch it in with him. If that is the case, I think that speaks volumes about the lack of faith McCarthy has in our RBs. I can't blame him since B-Jack is hardly a special or gritty runner.

You're not going to have the chance to let routes develop at the 1 yard line; teams go exclusively press and WRs can only do so much when they have a very limited amount of space to try and get free in. So I'm not sure I disagree with the call - although I think it speaks volumes about how Ted has short-changed this team at RB after Grant. I, frankly, can't come up with a better call to punch the ball in from the 1 given our top RB was ineffective and the 2nd man behind him left the game with a concussion earlier.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Cheesey
13 years ago
Well, as i said in another thread, WHY DID THEY KICK IT DEEP AT THE END???
You SQIB kick it, to prevent a big return.
Stupid, if you ask me.
UserPostedImage
Greg C.
13 years ago

Well, as i said in another thread, WHY DID THEY KICK IT DEEP AT THE END???
You SQIB kick it, to prevent a big return.
Stupid, if you ask me.

"Cheesey" wrote:



I've seen squib kicks blow up in teams' faces in that situation, giving the oponent a short field to set up a field goal drive. Usually a squib kick gives them the ball around the 35-40 yard line. With a conventional kickoff, the other team will usually start around the 28 yard line. Atlanta does not have a great kick returner, and they had done nothing on kick returns all day. McCarthy was just playing the percentages. I wouldn't have tried a squib kick unless there was much less time on the clock--say, time for only two or three more plays.
blank
Stevetarded
13 years ago
You squib if the other team needs a td not a fg
blank
yooperfan
13 years ago
Our strong legged kicker should have been able to blast it right out of the endzone in a dome.
Something wrong with him?
mi_keys
13 years ago

The problem with those plays on the goal line is that we cannot just punch it in. Lombardi would call a sweep. Everyone in America would know what was coming, but no one could stop it. Not so with this team.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



Interesting to hear Rodgers comment on why he checked into the goal line run - said it was the exact look that Miami gave them when they used it before, and he thought he could catch them off guard.

I was pretty appalled with going for it at the 1 the second play by calling Rodgers number again. However, someone pointed out on another site - and I think it has merit - that those are the situations you use your best RB to punch the ball in. Rodgers was our best back in that game, so McCarthy decided to try to punch it in with him. If that is the case, I think that speaks volumes about the lack of faith McCarthy has in our RBs. I can't blame him since B-Jack is hardly a special or gritty runner.

You're not going to have the chance to let routes develop at the 1 yard line; teams go exclusively press and WRs can only do so much when they have a very limited amount of space to try and get free in. So I'm not sure I disagree with the call - although I think it speaks volumes about how Ted has short-changed this team at RB after Grant. I, frankly, can't come up with a better call to punch the ball in from the 1 given our top RB was ineffective and the 2nd man behind him left the game with a concussion earlier.

"nerdmann" wrote:



That was exactly my thought on the first Rodgers sneak, that it was exactly the same thing they did against Miami which they converted easily.

What I think is even more embarrassing about that series and other series we've had is that our offensive line never once gets any push when all we need is 1 yard. Yeah the running back performance is awful but just once could you maybe push the defense back half a yard? It's pathetic.
Born and bred a cheesehead
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago

I, frankly, can't come up with a better call to punch the ball in from the 1 given our top RB was ineffective and the 2nd man behind him left the game with a concussion earlier.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



We have perhaps the best red-zone passing quarterback in the league. Why not give him a chance to throw a touchdown? Atlanta was clogging the middle of the line -- the corners of the end zone would have been wide open.
UserPostedImage
Scottish_Packer
13 years ago
What hurts is seeing another close game go to the other team. We were good though, but Atlanta didn't really slip up and deserved the win.

Tough losses against great teams let you know where you need to elevate your play to.
UserPostedImage
warhawk
13 years ago

The problem with those plays on the goal line is that we cannot just punch it in. Lombardi would call a sweep. Everyone in America would know what was coming, but no one could stop it. Not so with this team.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



Interesting to hear Rodgers comment on why he checked into the goal line run - said it was the exact look that Miami gave them when they used it before, and he thought he could catch them off guard.

I was pretty appalled with going for it at the 1 the second play by calling Rodgers number again. However, someone pointed out on another site - and I think it has merit - that those are the situations you use your best RB to punch the ball in. Rodgers was our best back in that game, so McCarthy decided to try to punch it in with him. If that is the case, I think that speaks volumes about the lack of faith McCarthy has in our RBs. I can't blame him since B-Jack is hardly a special or gritty runner.

You're not going to have the chance to let routes develop at the 1 yard line; teams go exclusively press and WRs can only do so much when they have a very limited amount of space to try and get free in. So I'm not sure I disagree with the call - although I think it speaks volumes about how Ted has short-changed this team at RB after Grant. I, frankly, can't come up with a better call to punch the ball in from the 1 given our top RB was ineffective and the 2nd man behind him left the game with a concussion earlier.

"nerdmann" wrote:



The first sneak was an audible by Rodgers and the second one McCarthy said he tried to get a timeout so he could change the play and didn't get it. Little things like that and the 4th down drop we missed that should have been challenged really changed the outcome of the game.

The way this game went fell right into the hands of the Falcons. They got a couple of long drives, never used any hurry-up offense and it seemed like we started from our own 10 every damn time. We moved the ball almost every time we had it but had so far to go and it took so long we didn't get the number chances we really needed.
"The train is leaving the station."
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (10h) : Bears. Vikings. OT
Mucky Tundra (10h) : Thems the breaks I guess
Mucky Tundra (10h) : Two players out and Williams had an injury designation this week but Oladapo is a healthy scratch
Zero2Cool (11h) : Packers inactives vs 49ers: • CB Jaire Alexander • S Kitan Oladapo • LB Edgerrin Cooper • OL Jacob Monk
TheKanataThrilla (13h) : Aaron Jones with a costly red zone fumble
Zero2Cool (14h) : When we trade Malik for a 1st rounder, we'll need a new QB2.
packerfanoutwest (23-Nov) : Report: Aaron Rodgers wants to play in 2025, but not for the Jets
beast (23-Nov) : That's what I told the Police officer about my speed when he pulled me over
packerfanoutwest (23-Nov) : NFL told Bears that Packers’ blocked field goal was legal
packerfanoutwest (22-Nov) : 49ers are underdogs at Packers, ending streak of 36 straight games as favorites
Zero2Cool (22-Nov) : 49ers might be down their QB, DL, TE and LT?
packerfanoutwest (22-Nov) : Jaire Alexander says he has a torn PCL
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : Even with the context it's ... what?
Mucky Tundra (20-Nov) : Matt LaFleur without context: “I don’t wanna pat you on the butt and you poop in my hand.”
beast (20-Nov) : We brought in a former Packers OL coach to help evaluate OL as a scout
beast (20-Nov) : Jets have been pretty good at picking DL
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : He landed good players thanks to high draft slot. He isn't good.
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : He can shove his knowledge up his ass. He knows nothing.
beast (20-Nov) : More knowledge, just like bring in the Jets head coach
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : What? Why? Huh?
beast (19-Nov) : I wonder if the Packers might to try to bring Douglas in through Milt Hendrickson/Ravens connections
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : The Jets fired Joe Douglas, per sources
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : Jets are a mess......
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Pretty sure Jets fired their scouting staff and just pluck former Packers.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Jets sign Anders Carlson to their 53.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : When you cycle the weeks, the total over remains for season. But you get your W/L for that selected week. Confusing.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the total and percentage are the same as the previous weeks
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the total and percentage are the same as the previous weeks
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the totals are accurate..nrvrtmind
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : I don't follow what you are saying. The totals are not the same as last week.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : ok so then wht are the totals the same as last week?
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : NFL Pick'em is auto updated when NFL Scores tab is clicked
Martha Careful (19-Nov) : The offense was OK. Let's not forget the Bear defense is very very good.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : Who updates the leaderboard on NFLPickem?
beast (19-Nov) : Has the Packers offense been worse since the former Jets coach joined the Packers?
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Offense gets his ass in gear, this could be good.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Backup QB helped with three wins. Special Teams contributed to three wins.
bboystyle (18-Nov) : Lions played outside thats why. They scored 16 and 17 in the only 2 outside games this year
Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : The rest of the NFL is catching up to Packers ... kicking is an issue throughout league
packerfanoutwest (18-Nov) : Packers DL Kenny Clark: We knew 'we were going to block' Bears' game-winning field goal attempt
Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : Lions seem to be throttling everyone, but only (only) got 24 lol maybe the rain is why
Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : Packers vs Lions game doesn't seem so bad.
beast (18-Nov) : Dennis Green "They are what we thought they were, and we let them off the hook!"
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : comment of the day Z2Cool "Bears better than we want to admit. Packers worse than we think. It's facts."
Mucky Tundra (17-Nov) : my worst case scenario: Bears fix their oline and get a coach like Johnson from the Lions and his scheme
Zero2Cool (17-Nov) : Bears get OL fixed amd we might have a problem
buckeyepackfan (17-Nov) : Pretty sure they already have scouting reports on guys who aren't even starting for their college team. The future is now for me.
buckeyepackfan (17-Nov) : I tend to let Gute and Co. Worry about the future.
beast (17-Nov) : That's great news and Packers need to keep upgrading their OL, DL and DBs this off-season, so missing one guy doesn't kill them
beast (17-Nov) : That's great news and Packers need to keep upgrading their OL, DL and DBs this off-season, so missing one guy doesn't kill them
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

23-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

19-Nov / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.