Zero2Cool
14 years ago
http://packersnews.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20101124/PKR01/101124152/Rodgers-only-30-throws-shy-of-passer-rating-record-books 

Aaron Rodgers might land a spot among the elite in the NFL record books Sunday at Atlanta.

In his third season as a starter, Rodgers is only 30 pass attempts shy of the 1,500 minimum to qualify for the NFLs list of career leaders for passer rating. When he qualifies, whether thats this week or next, chances are hell rank No. 2 on the all-time list, behind only San Diegos Philip Rivers and immediately ahead of Steve Young, Tony Romo and Peyton Manning.

Its pretty cool to be mentioned with those guys there, because theyre real talented quarterbacks, Rodgers said when shown the list of the top five. Hall of Famer (i.e., Young), future Hall of Famer (Manning), potential future Hall of Famers (Rivers, Romo and Rodgers). Whats not on that list is, no Super Bowls (Rivers), no Super Bowls (Rodgers), one Super Bowl (Young), no Super Bowls (Romo), one Super Bowl (Manning). Guys get remembered more for winning Super Bowls than for passer ratings.

Passer rating, which is a formula based on four statistics (yards per attempt, completion percentage, touchdown percentage and interception percentage), has become one of the two most-used standards for measuring NFL quarterbacks, along with wins and losses. But its hardly the be all and end all.

In the mid-1970s, the NFL began changing rules to favor the passing game, and it hasnt stopped. This has made for an increasingly pass-oriented league, and passer ratings that continually rise with those changes. When defensive backs could drill receivers all over the field and offensive linemen couldnt use their hands, it was a lot harder to complete passes and avoid interceptions.

Thus, there are Pro Football Hall of Famers who rank surprisingly far down the list, and middling quarterbacks of more recent vintage who rank high.

For instance, Houstons Matt Schaub (91.4 points) is No. 11 in all-time passer rating, Miamis Chad Pennington (90.1 points) is No. 12 and Daunte Culpepper (87.8 points) is No. 13. Its hard to think any of them would crack the list of even the all-time top 100 quarterbacks.

On the other side, Dan Marino (86.4 points) ranks only No. 19, Troy Aikman (81.6 points) is tied at No. 42, Dan Fouts (80.2 points) is No. 57, John Elway (79.9 points) is No. 59 and Johnny Unitas (78.2 points) is tied for No. 69. Theyre all in the Hall of Fame, and at least three (Elway, Unitas and Marino) probably rank among the top 10 quarterbacks ever. Yet all but Marino rank behind Jacksonvilles mediocre David Garrard (No. 20 at 86.2 points) in passer rating.

Its a decent barometer, Rodgers said. Take the components of it: its efficiency, yards per attempt; its efficiency in touchdowns per attempts; its taking care of the football, interception percentage; completion percentage. I think its a good barometer of the type of quarterback you are. It doesnt measure a big run you might have had or a throwaway. But its a decent enough barometer.

Rodgers was one of five quarterbacks who finished last season with a passer rating of at least 100 points he was No. 4 at 103.2 points but will have to play near his level of the last couple of weeks over the final six games to hit the 100-point mark this year.

In the Packers first seven games, he threw nine interceptions, which is two more than his total for 2009. In the last three games, hes thrown seven touchdown passes and no interceptions. In the last two, wins over the New York Jets and Minnesota, his passer ratings were 131.5 points and 141.3 points, which is getting toward the maximum rating of 158.3 and suggests he could be on his way to a strong run in the second half. Thats pushed his season rating to 95.7, No. 8 in the league.

I think hes just being more exact with his decision-making, coach Mike McCarthy said of Rodgers recent play. His ball accuracy has been pretty consistent all year. I think sometimes you can play a little too fast. Sometimes you can be a little too smart. We had some of the turnovers there in the beginning of the year, particularly on third down. Thats not what you want.

But I think hes really in a groove right now. Hes playing with a lot of rhythm. Hes making plays with his feet. Hes playing the way that he expects to play and the way we expect him to play.

Rodgers looks like a quarterback who consistently will have a passer rating at least in the 90s because he combines accurate throwing (63.9 percent in his career) with relatively low-risk decision making, which will keep his interception totals down. So, even if he stays healthy enough to have a long career, its realistic to think he can finish with one of the highest ratings in league history.

But other more intangible qualities also will determine how much he accomplishes. Rodgers said hes learned that skills such as leadership are as much learned as innate, which offensive coordinator Joe Philbin drove home when he pulled him aside early in his career as a starter and told him his body language sometimes revealed frustration and made it look like he was blaming mistakes on teammates.

Being a quarterback, youre being watched not only by the TV audience and the fans, he said, but by your teammates, whose opinions really, really matter, and who are looking to you for leadership and for energy and for enthusiasm and how your demeanor is. Thats something you have to think about on a daily basis.


UserPostedImage
Greg C.
14 years ago
Passer rating is a good stat for the modern game, but unfortunately it does not work for comparing QBs of different eras. It emphasizes stats that are maximized in the West Coast type offenses that came into vogue in the early 90s. So this doesn't mean a whole lot, but hey, I'll take it.
blank
Dexter_Sinister
14 years ago
They should take out YAC. The QB doesn't run after the throw, so he shouldn't get credit for it.

To look at old timers, you should look at them in relation to their contemporaries.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
I actually agree. For example, during the Patriots/Lions game today, Tom Brady threw about 10 or 15 yards downfield to a wide-open receiver, but it went down as a 79-yard pass for a touchdown. Not because he did anything special, but because the cornerback was absolutely incapable of taking down the receiver. He actually missed the receiver three times on a single play. Why should Brady receive credit for the entire play when his contribution was relatively minor (and easy).
UserPostedImage
Greg C.
14 years ago
Take out YAC? Are you guys kidding? YAC often (or even usually) has a lot to do with the QB hitting his receiver in stride so that he doesn't have to slow down or change course as he makes the catch. Favre was the master at that.

Brady got lucky on that long TD. He underthrew the ball, allowing the DB to get back into the play, but Branch was still able to elude him. That was the same DB, Alphonso Smith, who made that impressive interception on that deep ball to Greg Jennings. He played like a clown all day yesterday.
blank
DakotaT
14 years ago

I actually agree. For example, during the Patriots/Lions game today, Tom Brady threw about 10 or 15 yards downfield to a wide-open receiver, but it went down as a 79-yard pass for a touchdown. Not because he did anything special, but because the cornerback was absolutely incapable of taking down the receiver. He actually missed the receiver three times on a single play. Why should Brady receive credit for the entire play when his contribution was relatively minor (and easy).

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Because that same QB gets the interception in his column when the ball hits the guy in the hands and the receiver pops it up for the d-back. If you are going to make yac a seperate category, then you'll have to do it for tipped balls that are intercepted. It doesn't seem too complicated. Either that or we have lazy statisticians.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
I have repeatedly advocated creating a statistical category that holds receivers responsible for failing to complete the catch. When the ball caroms off the hands or chest of the receiver into the paws of the defender, I don't think that should count as an interception. It should go down as a drop or something to that effect.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
14 years ago
QB rating isn't the end all be all stat. Greg C is spot on about eras. It's easier to get a good QB rating today than it was even 10 years ago. Using an example we'll all be familiar with, there's no way you can convince me that Brett Favre was better last year than he was in his 3 straight MVP seasons, despite the QB rating difference.

QB is one of those positions that there are too many intangibles to slap a simple rating on.

Still, I'm happy for Aaron. I think Aaron would be much happier though to have 3 or 4 SB Rings than the highest QB rating of all time. Don't want to speak for another man, but I bet if one of us ever got a chance to interview him, he'll respond so if asked that question.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

Take out YAC? Are you guys kidding? YAC often (or even usually) has a lot to do with the QB hitting his receiver in stride so that he doesn't have to slow down or change course as he makes the catch. Favre was the master at that.

Brady got lucky on that long TD. He underthrew the ball, allowing the DB to get back into the play, but Branch was still able to elude him. That was the same DB, Alphonso Smith, who made that impressive interception on that deep ball to Greg Jennings. He played like a clown all day yesterday.

"Greg C." wrote:



I can't believe someone would even consider removing YAC from a QB. Most QB's can hit a stationary target. The real trick is throwing it into a tight window while the WR is moving and making him not miss his stride.
UserPostedImage
longtimefan
14 years ago

I have repeatedly advocated creating a statistical category that holds receivers responsible for failing to complete the catch. When the ball caroms off the hands or chest of the receiver into the paws of the defender, I don't think that should count as an interception. It should go down as a drop or something to that effect.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



I agree 100000000000000% but there is an issue..


What I may think is a catchable ball, you or someone else doesnt think it was a catchable ball..

WR had to jump and reach high as possible but ball slips thru hands is intercepted..I say he could catch it, you say he couldnt...Or diving in the air I say he couldnt catch it, you say he could

It will NEVER be a perfect way to call that, so this is the only acceptable way of ruling it
Fan Shout
beast (15h) : Seems like he was just pissed because he was no longer the starter
beast (15h) : Campbell is right, he's rich and he doesn't have to explain sh!t... but that attitude gives teams reasons to never sign him again.
dfosterf (22-Feb) : I have some doubt about all that
dfosterf (22-Feb) : I read De'Vondre Campbell's tweet this morning (via the New York Post) Florio says that if he invested his earnings wisely, he will be good
beast (20-Feb) : I haven't followed, but I believe he's good when healthy, just hasn't been able to stay healthy.
dfosterf (20-Feb) : Hasn"t Bosa missed more games than he has played in the last 3 years?
Mucky Tundra (19-Feb) : He hasn't been too bad when healthy but I don't feel like I ever heard much about when he is
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Felt like he was more interested in his body, than football. He flashed more than I expected
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : When he was coming out, I thought he'd be flash in pan.
Mucky Tundra (19-Feb) : Joey seems so forgettable compared to his brother for some reason
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : NFL informed teams today that the 2025 salary cap will be roughly $277.5M-$281.5M
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Los Angeles Chargers are likely to release DE Joey Bosa this off-season as a cap casualty, per league source.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : If the exploit is not fixed, we'll see tons of "50 top free agents, 50 perfect NFL team fits: We picked where each should sign in March" lo
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Issue should be solved, database cleaned and held strong working / meeting. Boom!
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : It should be halted now.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : usually spambots are trying to get traffic to shady websites filled with spyware; the two links being spammed were to the Packers website
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : you know when you put it that way combined with the links it was spamming (to the official Packers website)
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yep. You can do that with holding down ENTER on a command in Console of browser
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : even with the rapid fire posts?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I'm not certain it's a bot.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I've got to go to work soon which is a pity because I'm enthralled by this battle between the bot and Zero
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, I see what that did. Kind of funny.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : now it's a link to Wes Hodkiezwicz mailbag
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Now they're back with another topic
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : oh lol
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I have a script that purges them now.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : 118 Topics with Message.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : what's 118 (besides a number)?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : They got 118 slapped in there.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : that's why it confused the hell out of me
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, but this is taking a headline and slapping it into the Packers Talk
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Wasnt there a time guests could post in the help forum?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : lol good question, kind of impressed!
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : So how is a guest posting?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Tell them its an emergency
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Working. Meetings.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Lots of fun; the spam goes back 4 or 5 pages by this point
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought you'd look for yourself and put 2 and 2 together lol. I overestimated ya ;)
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought Guests couldnt post?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : And gosh that's gonna be fun to clean up! hahaa
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Oh. Why not just say that then? Geez.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : check the main forum, seems a spam bot is running amok
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : What?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Is the Packers online game "Packers Predict" now available for 2024? I can't tell
Zero2Cool (17-Feb) : Bengals planning to Franchise Tag Tamaurice Higgins
Zero2Cool (14-Feb) : Packers are hiring Luke Getsy as senior offensive assistant.
Martha Careful (12-Feb) : I would love to have them both, esp. Crosby, but either might be too expensive.
Zero2Cool (12-Feb) : Keisean Nixon is trying to get Maxx Crosby and Davante Adams lol
Mucky Tundra (11-Feb) : Yeah where did it go?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : or did you resctrict access to that topic?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

15-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.