andrew quarless : key down the stretch !!

nyrpack
Veteran Member Topic Starter

14 years ago

with no finley or pretty much a power rb, the pack are gonna need to keep things simple down the stretch.the weather is gonna be a factor in a couple of weeks, so aaron is gonna need to keep things short, and quarless is gonna be key in my opinion, i say he will step up and is going to be a valuable guy in the coming weeks !!

jimmy b.

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

gbguy20
Veteran Member

14 years ago

alrighty

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Greg C.
Registered

14 years ago

Quarless is our best hope at TE, which isn't saying much, and he looks better than Finley did as a rookie, which again isn't saying much. But I do think Quarless could make an impact down the stretch. He is probably our only TE with enough speed to run Finley-type routes.

blank

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

14 years ago

I personally don't think we are going to see much of Quarless. If we were, we would have already seen it. I think we will see the WR's targeted mainly.

alrighty

"gbguy20" wrote:

Nice contribution there bud.

Rios39
Member

14 years ago

He's highly talented maybe not as talented as Finley but hes a different style. He has great hands and im actually surprised he isnt getting much playing time. I think he will be a very solid duo with Finley next year.

blank

Felipe7777777
Registered

14 years ago

I actually think his hands are kind of crappy if I can remember he's dropped quite a few easy passes this year, however, I think he will play a big role as a TE just because Rodgers will need a security blanket to use and the TE is usually it

blank

TwinkieGorilla
Member

14 years ago

"Rios39" wrote:

Ehhhh? How do we know this? Quarlz hasn't proven a damn thing s'far as I'm concerned. Not saying I doubt him, just saying he hasn't done anything to prove to me that I shouldn't doubt him either.

I agree with Twinkiegorilla.

bozz_2006 wrote:

Dulak
Veteran Member

14 years ago

Im not having a tremendous amount of faith in him either' while I think he is an option; he is no finley and not even a lee (although lee is a dropsie guy also).

maybe we will get to see havner back 🙂 now he wasnt a dropsie guy ... always liked his TD catches 🙂

nerdmann
Premier Member

14 years ago

If we keep seeing cover 2 defenses, we'll need TEs. That said, we've got Lee, who is a passcatching TE and we've also gotten Havner back. Dude has a knack.
Still, I agree. Quarless is definitely a wild card here. Wouldn't mind seeing him AND my boy Starks get tested.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Packers_Finland
Registered

14 years ago

#10

Too much hype about Quarless. He's made a few catches so far, but he's had so little production that counting on him is too much.

I also don't think we'll need him. We've been fine with Jennings, Jones and Nelson, and a hobbled Driver.

This is a placeholder

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (4m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (12m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (24m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (4h) : Packers will get in

beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS