nyrpack
  • nyrpack
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
with no finley or pretty much a power rb, the pack are gonna need to keep things simple down the stretch.the weather is gonna be a factor in a couple of weeks, so aaron is gonna need to keep things short, and quarless is gonna be key in my opinion, i say he will step up and is going to be a valuable guy in the coming weeks !!
jimmy b.
gbguy20
14 years ago
alrighty
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Greg C.
14 years ago
Quarless is our best hope at TE, which isn't saying much, and he looks better than Finley did as a rookie, which again isn't saying much. But I do think Quarless could make an impact down the stretch. He is probably our only TE with enough speed to run Finley-type routes.
blank
go.pack.go.
14 years ago
I personally don't think we are going to see much of Quarless. If we were, we would have already seen it. I think we will see the WR's targeted mainly.

alrighty

"gbguy20" wrote:



Nice contribution there bud.
UserPostedImage
Rios39
14 years ago
He's highly talented maybe not as talented as Finley but hes a different style. He has great hands and im actually surprised he isnt getting much playing time. I think he will be a very solid duo with Finley next year.
blank
Felipe7777777
14 years ago
I actually think his hands are kind of crappy if I can remember he's dropped quite a few easy passes this year, however, I think he will play a big role as a TE just because Rodgers will need a security blanket to use and the TE is usually it
blank
14 years ago

He's highly talented maybe not as talented as Finley but hes a different style. He has great hands and im actually surprised he isnt getting much playing time. I think he will be a very solid duo with Finley next year.

"Rios39" wrote:



Ehhhh? How do we know this? Quarlz hasn't proven a damn thing s'far as I'm concerned. Not saying I doubt him, just saying he hasn't done anything to prove to me that I shouldn't doubt him either.

I agree with Twinkiegorilla.

bozz_2006 wrote:


Dulak
14 years ago
Im not having a tremendous amount of faith in him either' while I think he is an option; he is no finley and not even a lee (although lee is a dropsie guy also).

maybe we will get to see havner back 🙂 now he wasnt a dropsie guy ... always liked his TD catches 🙂
nerdmann
14 years ago
If we keep seeing cover 2 defenses, we'll need TEs. That said, we've got Lee, who is a passcatching TE and we've also gotten Havner back. Dude has a knack.
Still, I agree. Quarless is definitely a wild card here. Wouldn't mind seeing him AND my boy Starks get tested.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Packers_Finland
14 years ago
Too much hype about Quarless. He's made a few catches so far, but he's had so little production that counting on him is too much.

I also don't think we'll need him. We've been fine with Jennings, Jones and Nelson, and a hobbled Driver.
This is a placeholder
Fan Shout
dfosterf (4h) : Mackelvie
dfosterf (4h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?
dfosterf (4h) : Youtube
Zero2Cool (9h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
dfosterf (11h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (13h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (13h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (13h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (13h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (15h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.