Greg C.
14 years ago

He's highly talented maybe not as talented as Finley but hes a different style. He has great hands and im actually surprised he isnt getting much playing time. I think he will be a very solid duo with Finley next year.

"TwinkieGorilla" wrote:



Ehhhh? How do we know this? Quarlz hasn't proven a damn thing s'far as I'm concerned. Not saying I doubt him, just saying he hasn't done anything to prove to me that I shouldn't doubt him either.

"Rios39" wrote:



Of course he hasn't proven anything. He's a raw rookie who hasn't yet gotten a lot of playing time. The point of the thread is that Quarless is a player who hasn't done much yet but could emerge toward the end of the season. I suppose nyrpack could've started a thread predicting that Greg Jennings would play big down the stretch, but that wouldn't have been very interesting.

The reasons for Quarless maybe emerging are that he had a great college career at a good football school, he has shown some skills as a rookie, he is still learning the game, and he is part of an offense with a great QB that has a huge void at TE that needs to be filled.

Felipe said that Quarless has dropped "quite a few easy passes" this year. The only drop I remember was a difficult pass in the Family Night scrimmage, then there was the fake field goal where he slipped. I can't remember him dropping any passes at all in the regular season, and I would be surprised if he had more than one or two drops.
blank
millertime
14 years ago
He has dropped two sure-fire TDs this year. I think one was during that losing streak we had (maybe Bears?). I can't specifically remember what game the other one happened in.

I'm not sure if A-Rod has complete trust in Quarless yet. Maybe that explains his lack of opportunities.
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
Quarless missed the fake FG pass. It was a deep pass and if he caught it, his momentum would have taken him out of bounds. I don't remember any other miss that was close to being a TD.
UserPostedImage
Greg C.
14 years ago

He has dropped two sure-fire TDs this year. I think one was during that losing streak we had (maybe Bears?). I can't specifically remember what game the other one happened in.

I'm not sure if A-Rod has complete trust in Quarless yet. Maybe that explains his lack of opportunities.

"millertime" wrote:



Yes, I remember now: He dropped a would-be TD pass against the Bears. I think that was an easy one. It was kind of forgotten (except by the fantasy geeks) because Rodgers scored a play or two later on a scramble.

You could also be thinking of the one he dropped against the Vikings that was ruled a TD but would not have held up had it been reviewed. I remember that one, but I wasn't counting it against him. It wasn't exactly an easy catch anyway.

So yes, there are doubts about his hands, but I will still say this: Receivers drop passes sometimes--especially rookies. I wouldn't say that the drops are a red flag at this point. And he has made some nice catches.

P.S. I googled "Andrew Quarless dropped pass" and found several references to the one in the Bears game, but no others.
blank
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
Two dropped passes and he's labeled bad hands? What's that make Donald Driver, Greg Jennings for that matter? lol
UserPostedImage
Greg C.
14 years ago

Two dropped passes and he's labeled bad hands? What's that make Donald Driver, Greg Jennings for that matter? lol

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I know it. Lots of fans are real quick to label a young player as having bad hands after just one or two drops. It happens with fumbles too.
blank
Greg C.
14 years ago
You could be on to something, nyrpack. Quarless started and caught all three passes that were thrown to him, while Donald Lee was a healthy scratch.
blank
warhawk
14 years ago
Watching the Finley/Quarles show in the future will be fun but not having Finley right now and down the stretch reeeeealy hurts. They can't guard him when he moves outside and it also opens everybody else up.

Sure we miss Grant with the run game struggling but not having Finley out there is really the kicker that I think has prevented us from getter over the top in these close games.

If you don't think so just ask "how many red-zone TD's would he have by now?" The guys a difference maker. Nothing against Quarles but the threat Finley brings into every pattern that you don't get out of Quarles is huge.
"The train is leaving the station."
Rios39
14 years ago
Finley had problems catching balls too. he ran bad routes and made mental mistakes. Quarless is a very talented TE who DOES have good hands and speed.
blank
DakotaT
14 years ago
Quarles is just fine, just needs more opportunity. We are going to have one scary good double tight end set next year. Double tight ends, plus Jones, Jordy, and Jennings.

To quote Mr. Miaga - "If done properly, no can defense."
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (6m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (14m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (26m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (4h) : Packers will get in
beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.