DakotaT
14 years ago

thats why a trade for a RFA is the most viable option.

"bozz_2006" wrote:




So what team are we talking about here Bozz?
UserPostedImage
bozz_2006
14 years ago
Charlie Johnson from Indy. Brown from New Orleans, though i don't know if he's restricted (he is good though) and he was on IR this season. Zach Strief from NO. Barnes from Oakland. Marcus Mcneill from San Diego. Barron from St. Louis. Penn from Tampa.

source 

I think the most viable options are obviously Penn and Barron. I wouldn't be upset with Khalif Barnes. And I think New Orleans is going to get rid of one of their guys. I'd be happy with either.
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
14 years ago

Charlie Johnson from Indy. Brown from New Orleans, though i don't know if he's restricted (he is good though) and he was on IR this season. Zach Strief from NO. Barnes from Oakland. Marcus Mcneill from San Diego. Barron from St. Louis. Penn from Tampa.

source 

I think the most viable options are obviously Penn and Barron. I wouldn't be upset with Khalif Barnes. And I think New Orleans is going to get rid of one of their guys. I'd be happy with either.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



Note that the Saints also have Jermon Bushrod, so I'd be looking at (as I said, I already am) very closely at that Brown/Strief possibility, or possibly a trade for Bushrod (his contract expires next year)

I really think we have to hang on to Chad-- I just don't want to see taking a shot with other options without also having that option available.
British
14 years ago
On the subject of Giacomini, one of the few things he's done was lead the race for RT last offseason. He was beating out Barbre through OTAs and TC before he picked up an ankle sprain and the coaches gave the job to Barbre in an attempt to get some early cohesion to the line.

Beating out Barbre may not be difficult but it suggests he showed something.

Also, the fact we kept him on the 53 is a big sign the coaches value him. Considering we had to cut players like Tyrell Sutton and Meredith one assumes the people who know him best like him enough to keep him on board at others' expense.
UserPostedImage
buckeyepackfan
14 years ago
Here are a couple of intersting remarks posted on Kffl. Looks like Wells performed well enough to solidify his starting position.

College on the other hand may be in trouble.

Packers | Spitz could be in mix for LG next season
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:38:05 -0800

Bob McGinn, of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, reports Green Bay Packers OG Jason Spitz likely will not regain the starting center position but could be a factor for the starting left guard position.




Packers | Could release Colledge
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:34:11 -0800

Bob McGinn, of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, reports the Green Bay Packers could release OT Daryn Colledge during the offseason.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
bozz_2006
14 years ago
fine with me.
UserPostedImage
14 years ago
I have always preferred Wells at center and Spitz at LG. This would make me happy.
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
14 years ago
Put the best line together.

If that is spitz at LG and Wells at C fine. I don't think that would be best though. Wells gives up to much in weight these days. Give me a beast at LG so Spitz is free to play C.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
warhawk
14 years ago

Put the best line together.

If that is spitz at LG and Wells at C fine. I don't think that would be best though. Wells gives up to much in weight these days. Give me a beast at LG so Spitz is free to play C.

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:



I think the solution at LG is Lang. I know that doesn't fix the T position but the way I look at it G is Lang's best chance at being a great player and helping the OL the most.

I would bring Tauscher back because I don't think he will be prohibitive cost wise and he showed he can get it done and then figure out how to deal with LT.

Lang, Spitz/Wells, Sitton, and Tauscher would be a great start in putting out a quality OL right out of the blocks next year. Either a 1st round pick or FA at LT. I would keep Wells because they could move Spitz to either G spot with an injury, or, move him to G if they needed Lang to move outside.

This would be building off of the model the Saints and Dallas have in bulking up the interior of the OL with big, strong guys, but with the ability to pull at times too.
"The train is leaving the station."
PackFanWithTwins
14 years ago

Put the best line together.

If that is spitz at LG and Wells at C fine. I don't think that would be best though. Wells gives up to much in weight these days. Give me a beast at LG so Spitz is free to play C.

"warhawk" wrote:



I think the solution at LG is Lang. I know that doesn't fix the T position but the way I look at it G is Lang's best chance at being a great player and helping the OL the most.

I would bring Tauscher back because I don't think he will be prohibitive cost wise and he showed he can get it done and then figure out how to deal with LT.

Lang, Spitz/Wells, Sitton, and Tauscher would be a great start in putting out a quality OL right out of the blocks next year. Either a 1st round pick or FA at LT. I would keep Wells because they could move Spitz to either G spot with an injury, or, move him to G if they needed Lang to move outside.

This would be building off of the model the Saints and Dallas have in bulking up the interior of the OL with big, strong guys, but with the ability to pull at times too.

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:



Would bring Colledge back also.

new LT, Lang, Spitz, Sitton, Tauscher with Colledge as the first backup at everything but LT and C.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (23m) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (24m) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (1h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (1h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (1h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (1h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (1h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (1h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (1h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (1h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (1h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (1h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (1h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (1h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (1h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (1h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (1h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (1h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (1h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (2h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (2h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (2h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (2h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (2h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (2h) : Packers will get in
beast (2h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (2h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (2h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (4h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (5h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (5h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (5h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (6h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (15h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (15h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (15h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (19h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29m / Random Babble / Martha Careful

42m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.