dfosterf
14 years ago
JSOnline- Bush up for the challenge 

Bush up for the challenge
DB says he's ready for Cards' elite receivers

By Tom Silverstein of the Journal Sentinel

Posted: Dec. 31, 2009




Green Bay There's no getting around it.

When the Green Bay Packers play Arizona, be it Sunday and/or the Sunday after that, cornerback Jarrett Bush is going to have to cover one of the Cardinals' talented trio of wide receivers.

The Packers will probably do what they can to limit his match-ups against all-world receiver Larry Fitzgerald, but they can only do so much, and at some point Bush will have to hold up under the weight of playoff football. He'll get a dress rehearsal on Sunday when the teams meet in the regular-season finale.

He expects to be tested.

"Any challenge, I have to make them pay," Bush said Thursday, less than a week after getting his first NFL interception. "I'm pretty sure they're going to come after everybody. I'm pretty sure they feel strongly about all their receivers, Larry, Anquan (Boldin). So, everybody's going to be challenged.

"I wouldn't think it would be just young guys. This is the NFL, we all have to play to our ability and play like we know how."

It may be a little bit of wishful thinking to assume that quarterback Kurt Warner will attack Charles Woodson the same way he would Bush, but Bush is correct in thinking the Cardinals will take their receivers matched up against anyone in the NFL. They line up as though they don't care what the coverage will be, using Fitzgerald, Boldin, Steve Breaston and running back LaRod Stephens-Howling in multiple positions along the line of scrimmage.

But there is a method to coach Ken Whisenhunt's madness and it often has to do with finding the weakness in the opponent's secondary. If he wants to try to exploit Bush, he'll have all kinds of ways to do it.

"He'll try to scheme you and try to take advantage of the best match-up possible," said safeties coach Darren Perry, a member of the Pittsburgh Steelers coaching staff when Whisenhunt was offensive coordinator there. "What he decides to do in terms of attacking us, we'll have to wait and see.

"But I know he'll try to find whatever our weaknesses may be. Whatever you see early, that's going to be his game plan. He'll stick with it. We got a little taste of that in the preseason."

The gusto with which Whisenhunt attacks the Packers will depend on whether the Cardinals are vying for the No. 2 seed in the playoffs. If Minnesota loses to the New York Giants in a noon game Sunday, the Cardinals won't be able to rest players or back off on their game plan because if they win, and the Dallas Cowboys beat the Philadelphia Eagles - a game that starts at the same time as the Packers-Cardinals - then Arizona gets the second seed and the first-round bye that comes with it.

The Packers aren't going to lie down in this game, but it's unlikely they'll use all the defenses they've practiced this week in preparation for the Cardinals. In some ways, the Packers will be feeling out the Cardinals to see how they react to some of their coverages, hoping to learn something that might help them if the two teams meet the following week.

"I wouldn't say this will be a training session," said Bush, who has extensive duties on special teams as well as his cornerback assignment. "We have to play to win. It's not a simulation. It's a real game. You can say we'll know them a lot better, but the reality is that we have to line up and play. It counts."

Bush has been the target of opposing quarterbacks since taking over the nickel position from Tramon Williams, who moved into a starting position when veteran Al Harris was lost for the season with a knee injury. Over the past five-plus games, he has allowed five pass plays of 20 or more yards, including three of 45 or more, and has allowed three touchdowns.

That's the most big plays any member of the defense has given up during that stretch, but not by a considerable amount. Williams has given up four plays of 20 or more yards, but just one touchdown. Woodson has given up 1 plays of 20 or more, but three touchdowns.

The thing that has made Bush's lapses so noticeable is that he has had decent coverage in some of those instances, but wasn't able to make a play on the ball. He has looked more like a special-teamer than someone with natural cornerback skills.

"I think it's natural but I think it's experience," Woodson said of playing the ball. "He's been asked to do a lot this year for us. I think the experience will make him a better player. I don't think you can tell anybody (how to do things) and they're automatically going to get better.

"They have to be in the fire a little bit. He's been thrown in the fire. But we expect him to play well for us down the stretch."

Against Seattle last Sunday, defensive coordinator Dom Capers took some pressure off Bush by frequently using him as the blitzing corner instead of Woodson. Bush blitzed five times to Woodson's zero, the idea being that Woodson and not Bush would be the one isolated in man coverage.

Two or three times, quarterback Matt Hasselbeck got rid of the ball on a three-step drop, well before Bush could get there. The other times, Bush wasn't able to beat a one-on-one block.

At 6-foot and 200 pounds, and with plenty of kamikaze special-teams skills, he has the potential to be a decent blitzer. But being effective requires using special techniques and Bush is learning on the job with that, too.

"It's just another challenge," Bush said.




A little editorializing in the title, but this is my personal "biggest" question.

It seems like folks were dying to address this when we were talking o-line, and that is very understandable.
PackFanWithTwins
14 years ago
We cannot take a page from the Viking defensive plan if we want to beat Arizona. The best way to help Bush is to get after Warner. We need to be up on the line, get in the face of these WR and hope that the pressure can get to Warner before the WR can make a play.

I do not want to see another game where a QB that everybody knows can complete passes is sitting in the pocket for 7 seconds or more. I would rather lose being aggressive.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
all_about_da_packers
14 years ago
The article does make a good point: Kurt Warner is not Big Ben.

You can get him down with a blitz, and his lack of mobility serves as a big advantage for us.

You know, our run D has been superb. That should give Capers the confidence that our front seven can stop the run. No need to bring in an 8th man in the box. I'd expect Capers to come in the first quarter make sure that the run is stopped. From then on, I expect him to unleash his 3-4 D full force to combat the Cards' passing game.

Make no mistake, Capers was brought in to make the defense successful in these situations.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
I'd say if we hit the pressure hard, we don't have to worry about the depth of our secondary being sub-par.
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
14 years ago
It will be very interesting to see what Dom does in the "first" game.

I suspect I (we?) will be semi-freaking out...

No pass rush?

Jesus H Chr#st on a stick we are gonna get our asses whipped next week, etc. kinds of statements...

I really like the thought of "sending" Bush vs. Woodson, but Woodson seems to get there, where I don't think Bush has shown he can---the statement about him needing to "learn" to get there, technique-wise---

A gazillion variables at play, what do we show, does he need to practice getting to Warner, do we do that, etc.
TheEngineer
14 years ago
Capers is a genius. We should have seen it coming: He's going to let Bush get beat all season long.

Come the wild card round, he'll unleash the real bush, like a demonspawn summoned through diabolical witchery, born from the raging fires within, set ablaze, to smite the cardinals from Arizona.

That, or he'll get burned for a couple of good plays both games.
blank
bozz_2006
14 years ago
It's all about pressure. Remember the 2007 Giants and their much maligned defensive secondary? That group was able to beat the highest scoring team in NFL history in the Super Bowl because they didn't give Tom Brady enough time to beat their pedestrian group of defensive backs. When it counts, Dom will bring the heat.
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
14 years ago

Capers is a genius. We should have seen it coming: He's going to let Bush get beat all season long.

Come the wild card round, he'll unleash the real bush, like a demonspawn summoned through diabolical witchery, born from the raging fires within, set ablaze, to smite the cardinals from Arizona.

That, or he'll get burned for a couple of good plays both games.

"TheEngineer" wrote:



+1

If the earlier part of your post has any truth in it, Dom fooled the shit out of yours truly also.

:sign5:
Greg C.
14 years ago

It's all about pressure. Remember the 2007 Giants and their much maligned defensive secondary? That group was able to beat the highest scoring team in NFL history in the Super Bowl because they didn't give Tom Brady enough time to beat their pedestrian group of defensive backs. When it counts, Dom will bring the heat.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



Very good point, and I hope you're right about Dom bringing the heat.
blank
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago

Capers is a genius. We should have seen it coming: He's going to let Bush get beat all season long.

Come the wild card round, he'll unleash the real bush, like a demonspawn summoned through diabolical witchery, born from the raging fires within, set ablaze, to smite the cardinals from Arizona.

"TheEngineer" wrote:



In other words, he's going to put Bush in the rotation at nose tackle? 🙂
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (3h) : Merry Christmas!
beast (12h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (20h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
46m / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

59m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

15h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22h / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.