RainX
15 years ago
Even though it won't show it in the stat sheet, I think Al Harris, Will Blackmon, and Pat Lee all being on IR certainly didn't help the situation tonight.
blank
musccy
15 years ago
Porky, excellent post, and gopackgo212, prefect point that I also was trying to make about Crosby. If he makes it, do the steelers onside? Do the packers play for a TD on the final drive?!?

Don't get me wrong, missing a 34 yarder is pathetic, but also not the reason the team lost.

HELL OF A GAME...about as exciting as you'll see in the NLF. Someone had to lose and unfortunately it was us.
bozz_2006
15 years ago
next order of business is to pray that the Giants lose, right?

Hopefully now the Packers remember how much they dislike losing, and will be playing winning football for the rest of the year.
UserPostedImage
Buck
15 years ago
The defense looked pretty worn down in the second half. I'm going to look on the bright side and take this game as the last little wake up call before the run for the big dance. This loss will make them better. This game was a playoff game for the steelers and they played like it. You knew after the cleveland loss they were going to be tough and they brought their A game. One more thing, Jarret Bush has gotta go, Ben I'm sure, will be sending him a christmas card.
yyyyeeeeeeeeeeepppppppp!
hardrocker950
15 years ago
I am not blaming Crosby for the loss, I am simply saying that he should be making his FGs - thats his job. I understand that not every FG will be made, even amongst the best kickers, but he is missing FGs that are standard. It really aches to see him miss, especially when I have seen him make 60 yard FGs in person during practice.

There are a lot of things that contributed to the loss, but when you miss your 3 points, it changes the game wether on the scoreboard or the atitude of your team.
evad04
15 years ago

Let them get down the field with 3 man rushes all day long.

For a show-off between two of the best defenses with two of the best DCs, this looked like a horribly vanilla game.

Especially that last drive. You know their O-line sucks. You know that Ben holds on to it too long. You've been gashed for 20-60 yard gains all day long on 3 man rushes. You'd expect Capers to dial up some damn blitzes and get after Ben.

On some of these plays, you can barely blaim the secondary, as they had to be in coverage way too long, way too often.

I have to agree, though, that Bush did not have a solid game. He had a horrendous one.

Bell looked ok when out there playing. Again, you give the QB half a year in the pocket and he's going to find a hole somewhere. There's very little Bell could do there without getting an illegal contact or defensive PI by the NBA officiating staff.

"Rockmolder" wrote:


There were a number of four-man pass rushes on the final drive, as well. That's also how Green Bay got two of their sacks. I don't mind bringing pressure, even on that last drive, but remember that some of the biggest plays in the game were on blitzes. Even if their first play on offense didn't feature a blitz, the effect was the same because Bush was by himself deep. Going into the final possession, I think we can agree that Green Bay was scheming to not give up the big play. On the touchdown itself, it's already been said: great throw and catch.

This stinks and we certainly could have played better, but I feel somewhat validated that we took control at crucial moments. Didn't get the W, I know -- but our last few offensive drives were inspiring.
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
15 years ago
Reasons why the team lost:
1. 503 yards passing. Give me a break.
2. Nine running plays called the entire game. Give me a break.
3. 35:22 -- Pitt's time of possession.

Crosby is going to get a lot of flack. But Crosby didnt give up the points. Crosby didn't call nine running plays. Crosby didn't give 35+ minutes of possession the Pittsburgh offense.

This was a team fuckup.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
evad04
15 years ago

Reasons why the team lost:
1. 503 yards passing. Give me a break.
2. Nine running plays called the entire game. Give me a break.
3. 35:22 -- Pitt's time of possession.

Crosby is going to get a lot of flack. But Crosby didnt give up the points. Crosby didn't call nine running plays. Crosby didn't give 35+ minutes of possession the Pittsburgh offense.

This was a team fuckup.

"Wade" wrote:


Convenient stats there, but put them in perspective. First off, we shut down Pittsburgh's run and they shut down ours. They gained 65 yards on 19 attempts, we had 60 on 12 runs (includes Rodgers' scrambling TD). In a game where both pass offenses were having success, I don't think you can fault the playcalling. If we're guilty of anything it's coming out flat at the beginning of the game.

Pittsburgh's time of possession was helpful, yeah, but until the LAST play it was largely irrelevant. Pitt held the ball for too much of the third quarter, but we added 22 points in the fourth quarter so we made up for it.

It was a close game. We could have done more with scoring opportunities; we certainly could have been better in pass defense. Specifically a missed field goal and big gashing plays against our pass defense hurt the most. Green Bay is typically astute at forcing turnovers, but not tonight (if you don't count that horseshit call on Matthews' sack/strip).

The ending of the game made it a heartbreaker, but for all our failings we were in it until the clock showed no time left.
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
I don't find it too terribly reassuring that we were "in it" with a team that had lost five in a row.
UserPostedImage
evad04
15 years ago

I don't find it too terribly reassuring that we were "in it" with a team that had lost five in a row.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:


Then you're probably reading too much into the five straight losses.

The Cowboys beat a team last night that had won 13 in a row. They must be the team to beat now.
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
Fan Shout
wpr (10h) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
3h / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.