coltonja
15 years ago

I liked how Bush was used against the Bears. He played a lot near the line of scrimmage and he covered the tight end a lot. He did a decent job against one of the better tight ends in the league.

This could be a niche for him. They need to avoid letting receivers get him isolated in space, because Bush is going to lose too many of those battles. But if he's scrapping at the line of scrimmage and against TE's, the Packers may be able to get by with him. Dom Capers just might be able to make this thing work, although I admit that I will be shaking in my boots when we go up against teams that have three or more really good receivers.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Wow. By far the best/ smartest thing said about Bush so far. That woulbe be a great spot for him. +1

"coltonja" wrote:



Very nice post, indeed.

Only thing I can think of is that you usually go to a nickel to account for that extra receiver. If you face the Bears or 49ers, your 3rd corner can indeed play an athletic TE.

But what do we do against, for instance, the Cardinals? They come out with 3-4 receivers sets as much as any team in the league. Breaston will be in as the 3rd receiver more often than not.

We'll need to have a man on him, if we're not playing zone, of course, and that man will most likely be Bush.

You can keep him protected and playing like this against the Bears, 49ers and Ravens, but this won't work against pass happy teams.

With the Cardinals, Eagles, Saints and Vikings storming into the play-offs, he'll better work on his ball skills. Like they appeared to have been doing this week. He showed some improvement. Especially in zone, it seemed.

"Greg C." wrote:



You just couldn't let us have a moment of hope šŸ™‚
UserPostedImage
Thanks to pack93z for the sig!!!
Greg C.
15 years ago

Very nice post, indeed.

Only thing I can think of is that you usually go to a nickel to account for that extra receiver. If you face the Bears or 49ers, your 3rd corner can indeed play an athletic TE.

But what do we do against, for instance, the Cardinals? They come out with 3-4 receivers sets as much as any team in the league. Breaston will be in as the 3rd receiver more often than not.

We'll need to have a man on him, if we're not playing zone, of course, and that man will most likely be Bush.

You can keep him protected and playing like this against the Bears, 49ers and Ravens, but this won't work against pass happy teams.

With the Cardinals, Eagles, Saints and Vikings storming into the play-offs, he'll better work on his ball skills. Like they appeared to have been doing this week. He showed some improvement. Especially in zone, it seemed.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



That's my worry too, but this is why it's good that the Packers are playing a lot more zone this season.

When Bush played nickel in '07, he got eaten up in those man-to-man matchups and by the end of the season he was demoted. But in Capers' system I'm hoping he can patrol the flats, for the most part (not all the time, because you can't get too predictable).

This puts an extra burden on Woodson, Williams, and Collins, and the LB's have to drop a little deeper to guard against those deep middle routes, but I think all those guys may be up to the challenge. It could be a workable system. Capers is very good at getting the best out of his players and hiding their weaknesses.

Does that make you feel any better, coltonja? I'm trying to cheer you up again.
blank
PackFanWithTwins
15 years ago
How bad is Bush in coverage. Didn't we use Swain at CB over Bush?


:)
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
15 years ago

I find it weird how strongly people are defending him.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



It's just because he didn't really do anything to deserve the criticism. He actually played very well, and he's getting shit by reputation alone. Nothing weird there, in my mind. Weird that he's getting criticized after having one of the best games of his career.
Greg C.
15 years ago

How bad is Bush in coverage. Didn't we use Swain at CB over Bush?


:)

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:



Swain played DB in that final exhibition game against Arizona, because of injuries in the secondary. I don't remember what Bush did in that game, but I doubt that Swain was considered a better option than Bush at DB.
blank
Rockmolder
15 years ago

Very nice post, indeed.

Only thing I can think of is that you usually go to a nickel to account for that extra receiver. If you face the Bears or 49ers, your 3rd corner can indeed play an athletic TE.

But what do we do against, for instance, the Cardinals? They come out with 3-4 receivers sets as much as any team in the league. Breaston will be in as the 3rd receiver more often than not.

We'll need to have a man on him, if we're not playing zone, of course, and that man will most likely be Bush.

You can keep him protected and playing like this against the Bears, 49ers and Ravens, but this won't work against pass happy teams.

With the Cardinals, Eagles, Saints and Vikings storming into the play-offs, he'll better work on his ball skills. Like they appeared to have been doing this week. He showed some improvement. Especially in zone, it seemed.

"Greg C." wrote:



That's my worry too, but this is why it's good that the Packers are playing a lot more zone this season.

When Bush played nickel in '07, he got eaten up in those man-to-man matchups and by the end of the season he was demoted. But in Capers' system I'm hoping he can patrol the flats, for the most part (not all the time, because you can't get too predictable).

This puts an extra burden on Woodson, Williams, and Collins, and the LB's have to drop a little deeper to guard against those deep middle routes, but I think all those guys may be up to the challenge. It could be a workable system. Capers is very good at getting the best out of his players and hiding their weaknesses.

Does that make you feel any better, coltonja? I'm trying to cheer you up again.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Aww, sorry Coltjona. Lol.

I agree with this one. When he can just sit back in a zone, you can take one of his biggest weaknesses away, as he'll be often facing the ball, already.

Would've been pretty funny to see Swain out there if he wasn't on IR.

Anyone remember our game against the Browns? They played WR Mike Furrey at nickel back. It worked amazingly well. Doesn't mean anything, but I thought that that was a pretty funny sight.
Lynn_Dickey
15 years ago

I find it weird how strongly people are defending him.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:



It's just because he didn't really do anything to deserve the criticism. He actually played very well, and he's getting shit by reputation alone. Nothing weird there, in my mind. Weird that he's getting criticized after having one of the best games of his career.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



The best game og HIS career is probably not good enough vs the Saints and Vikings. We were playing the Bears who are considered to have one of the worst receiver corps in the league. And please address the issue another team's announcers calling him out. THey have no dog in this show and i thoughts there comments were very matter of fact. BTW, they thought a lot of Mathews.
blank
15 years ago

I find it weird how strongly people are defending him.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



It's just because he didn't really do anything to deserve the criticism. He actually played very well, and he's getting shit by reputation alone. Nothing weird there, in my mind. Weird that he's getting criticized after having one of the best games of his career.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:



The best game og HIS career is probably not good enough vs the Saints and Vikings. We were playing the Bears who are considered to have one of the worst receiver corps in the league. And please address the issue another team's announcers calling him out. THey have no dog in this show and i thoughts there comments were very matter of fact. BTW, they thought a lot of Mathews.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



You thinking Bush will potentially be bad in the future against a better team is not a reason to call him out after a game where he played well. If and when that happens, THEN call him out for it. It didn't happen this week, so it's bullshit to call him out for something that didn't happen.

As far as the announcers, how the fuck should I know? I didn't even hear what they said. They are Bears fans. Isn't that enough reason for them to say something stupid?

The Bears were not able to take advantage of Bush, no matter what the Bears' radio announcers said. Woodson gave up a TD. Tramon Williams gave up a TD. Bush didn't give up a TD, or many catches, or many yards.

Give the kid a break.
IronMan
15 years ago
yooperfan
15 years ago

I find it weird how strongly people are defending him.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:



It's just because he didn't really do anything to deserve the criticism. He actually played very well, and he's getting shit by reputation alone. Nothing weird there, in my mind. Weird that he's getting criticized after having one of the best games of his career.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



The best game og HIS career is probably not good enough vs the Saints and Vikings. We were playing the Bears who are considered to have one of the worst receiver corps in the league. And please address the issue another team's announcers calling him out. THey have no dog in this show and i thoughts there comments were very matter of fact. BTW, they thought a lot of Mathews.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:



You thinking Bush will potentially be bad in the future against a better team is not a reason to call him out after a game where he played well. If and when that happens, THEN call him out for it. It didn't happen this week, so it's bullshit to call him out for something that didn't happen.

As far as the announcers, how the fuck should I know? I didn't even hear what they said. They are Bears fans. Isn't that enough reason for them to say something stupid?

The Bears were not able to take advantage of Bush, no matter what the Bears' radio announcers said. Woodson gave up a TD. Tramon Williams gave up a TD. Bush didn't give up a TD, or many catches, or many yards.

Give the kid a break.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



I've been on Bush's case in the past but I'm right with you on that one louder.
Fan Shout
dfosterf (3h) : It's my one day deal complaint dept. on shareholder meeting day
dfosterf (4h) : Probably a homer access credential intimidation kinda thing
dfosterf (4h) : Meathead "journalists" skip this, concentrating on operational revenue when convenient. They switch when net revenue is more favorable.
dfosterf (4h) : Resulting in an actual drop of net revenue of 12.5%. She is from Minnesota. Just sayin'
dfosterf (4h) : Any plans to hold Maureen Smith (CFO) accountable for a 95% drop in investment revenue?
Mucky Tundra (5h) : In your face, HBO!
Mucky Tundra (5h) : @ByRyanWood Mark Murphy: ā€œA great source of pride of mine is that we were never on Hard Knocks.ā€
Mucky Tundra (5h) : *years
Mucky Tundra (5h) : @mattschneidman Mark Murphy says he anticipates ā€œmany Packers gamesā€ being played in Germany, Ireland and/or the U.K. over the next 5-10 yea
dfosterf (5h) : *cafeteria* I have hit my head also, so I sympathize
dfosterf (5h) : Possibly hit his head leaning into the glass protecting the food in the cafateria
dfosterf (5h) : Maybe a low flying drone
dfosterf (5h) : Did Savion Williams run into a goalpost or something?
Mucky Tundra (5h) : also, no bueno when a guy starts getting concussions right off the bat in his career
Zero2Cool (6h) : Concussion is worse. Banks probably vet off day via back booboo claim
Mucky Tundra (8h) : @AndyHermanNFL Jordy Nelson out at camp today. No word if he’s in play for one of the two open roster spots ; )
dfosterf (8h) : Is that better or worse than Banks bad back?
Zero2Cool (9h) : Savion concussion ... not good.
packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : Who's Theo?
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : How is Theo alliteration?
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : Bad week for people whose names are alliterations
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Hulk Hogan gone too.
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Oh, it's toe injury
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Hope it's not serious. that would stink
dfosterf (24-Jul) : Sounds like an ankle not a knee for Fields
dfosterf (24-Jul) : Ya Flaccp on Browns
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Maybe Tyrod Taylor instead
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : He's on Browns, right?
dfosterf (24-Jul) : They would probably go with Flacco is my guess if Fields out
dfosterf (24-Jul) : Fleece 'em again!
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Malik Willis might be someone Jets come after
packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Packers introduce 1923-inspired classic uniform, leather-look helmet
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Both LB Quay Walker and Rookie DB Micah Robinson have passed their physicals
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Happy to see site feels more snappy snappy
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : No sir. I did not.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : You didn't get free childcare when you were at work?
wpr (23-Jul) : These guys make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Pay for their own childcare.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : 2nd issue. Number 1 issue was no gameday childcare. 1 of 3 teams not providing it
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Suppose if locker room is main issue, we sitting pretty
wpr (23-Jul) : I thought so Mucky. In those useless player polls GB always rates high overall. Locker is a part of it.
Mucky Tundra (23-Jul) : Wasn't the locker room just updated like 6 or 7 years ago?
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I have forum updated on different site. We'll see how this one goes before going to that
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Elgton Jenkins has a back injury, is expect to end contract dispute
wpr (23-Jul) : It's funny the PA complained about the locker room. It wasn't that long ago it was top shelf. Things change in a hurry.
wpr (23-Jul) : The site is much more better.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : NFLPA report said Packers lockerroom needed upgrade. Whining bout where you change?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
5h / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

20h / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

24-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright Ā© 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.comā„¢. All Rights Reserved.