TEAMS PICK-ON BUSH!!!!· Page 5

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

15 years ago

#41

Nonsense! Every other team has four All Pro DB's. Do some research dude!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

GermanGilbert
Member

15 years ago

#42

He has not improved at all. Seriously solid coverage? Solid game? The guy he was supposively covering had 8 catches EIGHT CATCHES!! Going into that game this Bears player had 6 catches in his career!!!

"coltonja" wrote:

As I just rewatched the game, I have to reply on this one.

Just to sum up the catches of Aromashodu:

1st catch: 1st and 10 for 7 yds (Barnett covered him)
2nd catch: 1st and 19 for 8 yds (Bigby covered him)
3rd catch: 1st and 10 for 10 yds (Williams covered him)
4th catch: 3rd and 9 for 19 yds (great throw by Cutler, very tight coverage by Bush, stopped him immediately after the catch)
5th catch: 1st and 10 for 9 yds (Woodson got burned, Bigby with the tackle)
6th catch: 1st and 10 for 10 yds (Woodson got burned for the TD)
7th catch: 2nd and 8 for 7 yds (Bush covered him, no YAC)
8th catch: 3rd and 1 for 6 yds (Bush covered him, quick pass, Bush got him immediately)

You really cannot blame Bush for Aromashodus career day, Bush did a good job in coverage. Additionally he had a great open field tackle against Forte in the 1st quarter.

blank

coltonja
Member

15 years ago

#43

Well, I'm glad people like his coverage so much. Can't wait til the playoffs (hopefully) when we face a team with a decent receiving corps and everyone can see howgood Bush really is.

Sorry for the negativity, but this is really the only subject of the Packers I can't stand. Bush has been a less than average player for three years and he is still here.

Again, I love the Pack, but I HATE how Bush plays and that he is still here.

Thanks to pack93z for the sig!!!

TwinkieGorilla
Member

15 years ago

#44

"GermanGilbert" wrote:

this is the exact type of post in a thread like this which deserves a +1. imo, it is the only post in this thread after the debating which deserves an applause.

now look, i'm not a fan of Bush...but our secondary has ALWAYS been a high-risk/high-reward type of secondary. i feel like year after year i'd watch Harris get beat like you all claim about Bush, but we've come to respect Harris because of how he plays the game. a casual observer only sees the mistakes. maybe some of you who are freaking out are actually being a bit too casual. the kid hasn't been utilized in the position he's playing for long or often and i see improvements. does he scare me? yes. does he scare me more than Harris in deep coverage? no. does he scare me more than MasonfuckingCrosby lately? no. does he scare me about as much as Rodgers late habit of balls appearing to have no target at all? or Tramon's million flags the other night? yes. but if that's the worst i'm feeling about a player i'll take it. at least for the rest of this season i will.

I agree with Twinkiegorilla.

bozz_2006 wrote:

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

15 years ago

#45

Rodgers late habit of balls appearing to have no target at all?

"TwinkieGorilla" wrote:

People bitched for months that Rodgers wasn't throwing it away. Now he is. 🙂

TwinkieGorilla
Member

15 years ago

#46

yeah, jokes aside...that ain't what i was referring to.

I agree with Twinkiegorilla.

bozz_2006 wrote:

DanJustDan29
Registered

15 years ago

#47

Bush should not be a starter...we need more in the Secondary.

Teamwork is what the Green Bay Packers were all about. They didn't do it for individual glory. They did it because they loved one another. -Vince Lombardi

TheEngineer
Registered

15 years ago

#48

The simple fact that people are rushing to Bush's defense this game is a testament to the fact that he really has perhaps improved in coverage.

I'm not sold on Bush being a reliable nickel or dime corner; I think Pat Lee or Underwood will fill that role next season. However, if he continues to improve, then there's nothing more to ask for from him.

blank

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#49

Bush should not be a starter...we need more in the Secondary.

"DanJustDan29" wrote:

We have lost 3 CB. How many #6 CB going to do better. Bush at least can play CB or S plus ST.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

15 years ago

#50

I wouldn't mind that Chris McAllister fella for a lookie look.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (3h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (9h) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (13h) : Merry Christmas!

beast (22h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS