The grass is always greener...

Greg C.
50.25% (Neutral)
Registered

15 years ago

I thought Tauscher had declined last season before the injury. I know he only gave up two sacks, but he seemed to lose some of his power, especially as a run blocker. I can't prove it, of course, because there are no good stats for offensive linemen. Number of sacks is about it, and it's only a partial and somewhat subjective measure of a lineman's performance in pass protection.

blank

dd80forever
50.25% (Neutral)
Registered

15 years ago

#22

You know what!

I agree with you! I think Snyder sucks to

But since you bit the hook heres a bit of info for you.

The Daniel Snyder led Redskins have a 1 game advamtage record-wise in the last 4 years over the Ted Thompson led Packers.

So everything you say about Snyder goes for Thompson. Different approaches same result - Failure

So to sum it up in your own words.....

Ha, Thompson is a freaking joke in football.

His franchise are a laughing stock.

They are a train wreck of a franchise

Now be hypocritical and go off into some rant about cap space, or untapped talent or how we will win games in 2012

Snyder is a joke.....but he's not quite as much of a joke as Ted Thompson. At least he tries to improve his team

blank

Cheesey
100% (Exalted)
Preferred Member

15 years ago

#23

You know what!

I agree with you! I think Snyder sucks to

But since you bit the hook heres a bit of info for you.

The Daniel Snyder led Redskins have a 1 game advamtage record-wise in the last 4 years over the Ted Thompson led Packers.

So everything you say about Snyder goes for Thompson. Different approaches same result - Failure

So to sum it up in your own words.....

Ha, Thompson is a freaking joke in football.

His franchise are a laughing stock.

They are a train wreck of a franchise

Now be hypocritical and go off into some rant about cap space, or untapped talent or how we will win games in 2012

Snyder is a joke.....but he's not quite as much of a joke as Ted Thompson. At least he tries to improve his team

"dd80forever" wrote:

You are hilarious! You should take your routine on the road! Seriously......i have never had such lame arguments thrown at me! I'm stting here laughing!
Thats ok....you just keep rambling on and on. I'm sure everyone else is getting a kick out of it! LOLOL!!!

Greg C.
50.25% (Neutral)
Registered

15 years ago

#24

dd80forever: Those were Thompson's first four years. It is expected that when a new GM and new coach come in, there are going to be a couple of down years. And if Thompson was considered to be "a joke," he would not have won the Executive of the Year award after the 2007 season. If his reputation has fallen so far just one year after that, it must be the best-kept secret in football, because I sure haven't heard about it. Maybe you should go to the Smack Forum, if we still have one of those here.

blank

Cheesey
100% (Exalted)
Preferred Member

15 years ago

#25

Oh Greg....he DOES go there.
Here he was having SO much fun....only to have you jump in and RUIN it all with those damn great points!
SHAME on you Greg!!!LOLOL!!!

dd80forever
50.25% (Neutral)
Registered

15 years ago

#26

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"Cheesey" wrote:

Yet when faced with the FACT that Snyder has a better record over the last 4 years then Ted Thompson has it reverts to mumbling about traveling comedy shows.

I love watching people squirm. It's funny. What no facts to back anything up?

blank

dd80forever
50.25% (Neutral)
Registered

15 years ago

#27

dd80forever: Those were Thompson's first four years. It is expected that when a new GM and new coach come in, there are going to be a couple of down years. And if Thompson was considered to be "a joke," he would not have won the Executive of the Year award after the 2007 season. If his reputation has fallen so far just one year after that, it must be the best-kept secret in football, because I sure haven't heard about it. Maybe you should go to the Smack Forum, if we still have one of those here.

"Greg C." wrote:

Executive of the year? Oh boy. Care to tell me where other Executives of the years are these days?

While you are at it look at Snyders record from his first 4 seasons as well.

Excuse #2 debunked.

blank

bozz_2006
56.25% (Neutral)
Registered

15 years ago

#28

VP Vinny Cerrato is actually considered the GM, not Snyder. Just want to help you get your story straight.

djcubez
65.25% (Friendly)
Senior Member

15 years ago

#29

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"dd80forever" wrote:

Yet when faced with the FACT that Snyder has a better record over the last 4 years then Ted Thompson has it reverts to mumbling about traveling comedy shows.

I love watching people squirm. It's funny. What no facts to back anything up?

"Cheesey" wrote:

I didn't even see you post any evidence of you're so-called "facts."

2005: Pack (4-12) Redskins (10-6)
2006: Pack (8-8) Redskins (5-11)
2007: Pack (13-3) Redskins (9-7)
2008: Pack (6-10) Redskins (8-8)

Packers (31-33) Redskins (32-32). You were correct in saying the Redskins had the better record but by one win? Oh yea, let's add this year and the Packers are on top. Not to mention that the Packers (4-2) are a youthful team that's just now developing into the team they've been built to be while the Redskins (2-5) are doing terrible and have a power struggle in the coaches office.

dd80forever
50.25% (Neutral)
Registered

15 years ago

#30

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"djcubez" wrote:

Yet when faced with the FACT that Snyder has a better record over the last 4 years then Ted Thompson has it reverts to mumbling about traveling comedy shows.

I love watching people squirm. It's funny. What no facts to back anything up?

"dd80forever" wrote:

I didn't even see you post any evidence of you're so-called "facts."

2005: Pack (4-12) Redskins (10-6)
2006: Pack (8-8) Redskins (5-11)
2007: Pack (13-3) Redskins (9-7)
2008: Pack (6-10) Redskins (8-8)

Packers (31-33) Redskins (32-32). You were correct in saying the Redskins had the better record but by one win? Oh yea, let's add this year and the Packers are on top. Not to mention that the Packers (4-2) are a youthful team that's just now developing into the team they've been built to be while the Redskins (2-5) are doing terrible and have a power struggle in the coaches office.

"Cheesey" wrote:

LOL, Which path to failure is better? 2 different approaches 1 result......mediocrity.

Yet when it's another teams mediocrity it's "they suck"

When it's your team it's "they have potential"

I was unaware the Redskins didn't have any "potential" on their team.

Yes and you win.......if you include this seasonthe Packers are 1 game above the Skins in the last 4 years..........Oh Thank God. 1 game better than the guy who "sucks". I feel so much better now.

blank

mi_keys
100% (Exalted)
Senior Member

15 years ago

#31

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"dd80forever" wrote:

Yet when faced with the FACT that Snyder has a better record over the last 4 years then Ted Thompson has it reverts to mumbling about traveling comedy shows.

I love watching people squirm. It's funny. What no facts to back anything up?

"djcubez" wrote:

I didn't even see you post any evidence of you're so-called "facts."

2005: Pack (4-12) Redskins (10-6)
2006: Pack (8-8) Redskins (5-11)
2007: Pack (13-3) Redskins (9-7)
2008: Pack (6-10) Redskins (8-8)

Packers (31-33) Redskins (32-32). You were correct in saying the Redskins had the better record but by one win? Oh yea, let's add this year and the Packers are on top. Not to mention that the Packers (4-2) are a youthful team that's just now developing into the team they've been built to be while the Redskins (2-5) are doing terrible and have a power struggle in the coaches office.

"dd80forever" wrote:

LOL, Which path to failure is better? 2 different approaches 1 result......mediocrity.

Yet when it's another teams mediocrity it's "they suck"

When it's your team it's "they have potential"

I was unaware the Redskins didn't have any "potential" on their team.

Yes and you win.......if you include this seasonthe Packers are 1 game above the Skins in the last 4 years..........Oh Thank God. 1 game better than the guy who "sucks". I feel so much better now.

"Cheesey" wrote:

Over the four year span that you initially cited Minnesota's record was 33-31 (1 game better than the Redskins at 32-32). I don't see you calling for Rick Spielman's head. I guess that 1 game better than the guy who sucks actually did make you feel much better!

Born and bred a cheesehead

Cheesey
100% (Exalted)
Preferred Member

15 years ago

#32

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"dd80forever" wrote:

Yet when faced with the FACT that Snyder has a better record over the last 4 years then Ted Thompson has it reverts to mumbling about traveling comedy shows.

I love watching people squirm. It's funny. What no facts to back anything up?

"Cheesey" wrote:

Squirm???LOLOL!!! Seriously.....STOP IT!!!! Your comedy show is killing me!!!LOLOLOL!!!
I haven't had this much fun in awhile! PLEASE don't do anything to get yourself banned! This stuff is PRICELESS!!!LOLOL!!! :thumbright:

dd80forever
50.25% (Neutral)
Registered

15 years ago

#33

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"Cheesey" wrote:

Yet when faced with the FACT that Snyder has a better record over the last 4 years then Ted Thompson has it reverts to mumbling about traveling comedy shows.

I love watching people squirm. It's funny. What no facts to back anything up?

"dd80forever" wrote:

Squirm???LOLOL!!! Seriously.....STOP IT!!!! Your comedy show is killing me!!!LOLOLOL!!!
I haven't had this much fun in awhile! PLEASE don't do anything to get yourself banned! This stuff is PRICELESS!!!LOLOL!!! :thumbright:

"Cheesey" wrote:

Squirm and Dodge Cheesey

How come Ted doesn't suck and Snyder does when they are even in the W-L category?

blank

djcubez
65.25% (Friendly)
Senior Member

15 years ago

#34

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"dd80forever" wrote:

Yet when faced with the FACT that Snyder has a better record over the last 4 years then Ted Thompson has it reverts to mumbling about traveling comedy shows.

I love watching people squirm. It's funny. What no facts to back anything up?

"djcubez" wrote:

I didn't even see you post any evidence of you're so-called "facts."

2005: Pack (4-12) Redskins (10-6)
2006: Pack (8-8) Redskins (5-11)
2007: Pack (13-3) Redskins (9-7)
2008: Pack (6-10) Redskins (8-8)

Packers (31-33) Redskins (32-32). You were correct in saying the Redskins had the better record but by one win? Oh yea, let's add this year and the Packers are on top. Not to mention that the Packers (4-2) are a youthful team that's just now developing into the team they've been built to be while the Redskins (2-5) are doing terrible and have a power struggle in the coaches office.

"dd80forever" wrote:

LOL, Which path to failure is better? 2 different approaches 1 result......mediocrity.

Yet when it's another teams mediocrity it's "they suck"

When it's your team it's "they have potential"

I was unaware the Redskins didn't have any "potential" on their team.

Yes and you win.......if you include this seasonthe Packers are 1 game above the Skins in the last 4 years..........Oh Thank God. 1 game better than the guy who "sucks". I feel so much better now.

"Cheesey" wrote:

What? First you state that Snyder has a better record than Thompson when in fact HE DOESN'T. You posted an outright lie. But instead of taking fault for it you just find another way to rag on the Packers. Seriously man, WHAT THE FUCK IS YOUR PROBLEM?

Packers definitely have more potential. They have a team on the rise. The Redskins have less. They have a team that's about to fire their head coach. Look at it anyway you want, the Packers are going up while the Redskins are heading down, unless they can turn it around quick.

British
50.25% (Neutral)
Registered

15 years ago

#35

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"dd80forever" wrote:

Yet when faced with the FACT that Snyder has a better record over the last 4 years then Ted Thompson has it reverts to mumbling about traveling comedy shows.

I love watching people squirm. It's funny. What no facts to back anything up?

"Cheesey" wrote:

Squirm???LOLOL!!! Seriously.....STOP IT!!!! Your comedy show is killing me!!!LOLOLOL!!!
I haven't had this much fun in awhile! PLEASE don't do anything to get yourself banned! This stuff is PRICELESS!!!LOLOL!!! :thumbright:

"dd80forever" wrote:

Squirm and Dodge Cheesey

How come Ted doesn't suck and Snyder does when they are even in the W-L category?

"Cheesey" wrote:

Because we're not simpletons that's why.

dd80forever
50.25% (Neutral)
Registered

15 years ago

#36

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"djcubez" wrote:

Yet when faced with the FACT that Snyder has a better record over the last 4 years then Ted Thompson has it reverts to mumbling about traveling comedy shows.

I love watching people squirm. It's funny. What no facts to back anything up?

"dd80forever" wrote:

I didn't even see you post any evidence of you're so-called "facts."

2005: Pack (4-12) Redskins (10-6)
2006: Pack (8-8) Redskins (5-11)
2007: Pack (13-3) Redskins (9-7)
2008: Pack (6-10) Redskins (8-8)

Packers (31-33) Redskins (32-32). You were correct in saying the Redskins had the better record but by one win? Oh yea, let's add this year and the Packers are on top. Not to mention that the Packers (4-2) are a youthful team that's just now developing into the team they've been built to be while the Redskins (2-5) are doing terrible and have a power struggle in the coaches office.

"djcubez" wrote:

LOL, Which path to failure is better? 2 different approaches 1 result......mediocrity.

Yet when it's another teams mediocrity it's "they suck"

When it's your team it's "they have potential"

I was unaware the Redskins didn't have any "potential" on their team.

Yes and you win.......if you include this seasonthe Packers are 1 game above the Skins in the last 4 years..........Oh Thank God. 1 game better than the guy who "sucks". I feel so much better now.

"dd80forever" wrote:

What? First you state that Snyder has a better record than Thompson when in fact HE DOESN'T. You posted an outright lie. But instead of taking fault for it you just find another way to rag on the Packers. Seriously man, WHAT THE FUCK IS YOUR PROBLEM?

Packers definitely have more potential. They have a team on the rise. The Redskins have less. They have a team that's about to fire their head coach. Look at it anyway you want, the Packers are going up while the Redskins are heading down, unless they can turn it around quick.

"Cheesey" wrote:

I wasn't figuring in this year......sorry.

We always have talent and are on the rise.......yet it never happens

blank

dd80forever
50.25% (Neutral)
Registered

15 years ago

#37

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"British" wrote:

Yet when faced with the FACT that Snyder has a better record over the last 4 years then Ted Thompson has it reverts to mumbling about traveling comedy shows.

I love watching people squirm. It's funny. What no facts to back anything up?

"dd80forever" wrote:

Squirm???LOLOL!!! Seriously.....STOP IT!!!! Your comedy show is killing me!!!LOLOLOL!!!
I haven't had this much fun in awhile! PLEASE don't do anything to get yourself banned! This stuff is PRICELESS!!!LOLOL!!! :thumbright:

"Cheesey" wrote:

Squirm and Dodge Cheesey

How come Ted doesn't suck and Snyder does when they are even in the W-L category?

"dd80forever" wrote:

Because we're not simpletons that's why.

"Cheesey" wrote:

aka: I don't have any ammo for my gun

blank

dhazer
100% (Exalted)
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#38

We have spent 3 pages of comparing ourselves to the Redskins omfg don't that make me feel good.

I have to give the nod to DDforver because he gave you guys proof and you guys couldn't do anything but say we have potential. I say screw potential i want wins on the field.

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

blueleopard
100% (Exalted)
Member

15 years ago

#39

What's the farthest a Snyder-led team got to in the playoffs?

What's the farthest a Thompson-led team got to in the playoffs?

Once you have the answer, stop arguing.

Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings

go.pack.go.
100% (Exalted)
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#40

dd80, you shouldn't even be posting on this forum, you should be following the Vikings bus! You're already in Brett Favre's JOCK!

So, how does it feel being the biggest follower on earth? You would be a Raider fan for Christ's sake if Brett Favre played for them.

I say screw you dd80 and get off of this board. It doesn't seem like you're a Packer fan. Just look at your avatar, and you will see an untrue fan. (Sorry about that).

--Sorry for overreacting (If you want to call it that), but I'm tired of this guy going on his rants against the Packers just because he's in Brett's jock and Brett no longer plays for the Packers.

Oh and by the way - nothing personal, you just piss me off, a LOT.

Important Information: