mi_keys
15 years ago

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"dd80forever" wrote:




Yet when faced with the FACT that Snyder has a better record over the last 4 years then Ted Thompson has it reverts to mumbling about traveling comedy shows.

I love watching people squirm. It's funny. What no facts to back anything up?

"djcubez" wrote:


I didn't even see you post any evidence of you're so-called "facts."

2005: Pack (4-12) Redskins (10-6)
2006: Pack (8-8) Redskins (5-11)
2007: Pack (13-3) Redskins (9-7)
2008: Pack (6-10) Redskins (8-8)

Packers (31-33) Redskins (32-32). You were correct in saying the Redskins had the better record but by one win? Oh yea, let's add this year and the Packers are on top. Not to mention that the Packers (4-2) are a youthful team that's just now developing into the team they've been built to be while the Redskins (2-5) are doing terrible and have a power struggle in the coaches office.

"dd80forever" wrote:




LOL, Which path to failure is better? 2 different approaches 1 result......mediocrity.

Yet when it's another teams mediocrity it's "they suck"

When it's your team it's "they have potential"

I was unaware the Redskins didn't have any "potential" on their team.

Yes and you win.......if you include this seasonthe Packers are 1 game above the Skins in the last 4 years..........Oh Thank God. 1 game better than the guy who "sucks". I feel so much better now.

"Cheesey" wrote:



Over the four year span that you initially cited Minnesota's record was 33-31 (1 game better than the Redskins at 32-32). I don't see you calling for Rick Spielman's head. I guess that 1 game better than the guy who sucks actually did make you feel much better!
Born and bred a cheesehead
Cheesey
15 years ago

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"dd80forever" wrote:




Yet when faced with the FACT that Snyder has a better record over the last 4 years then Ted Thompson has it reverts to mumbling about traveling comedy shows.

I love watching people squirm. It's funny. What no facts to back anything up?

"Cheesey" wrote:


Squirm???LOLOL!!! Seriously.....STOP IT!!!! Your comedy show is killing me!!!LOLOLOL!!!
I haven't had this much fun in awhile! PLEASE don't do anything to get yourself banned! This stuff is PRICELESS!!!LOLOL!!! :thumbright:

dd80forever
15 years ago

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"Cheesey" wrote:




Yet when faced with the FACT that Snyder has a better record over the last 4 years then Ted Thompson has it reverts to mumbling about traveling comedy shows.

I love watching people squirm. It's funny. What no facts to back anything up?

"dd80forever" wrote:


Squirm???LOLOL!!! Seriously.....STOP IT!!!! Your comedy show is killing me!!!LOLOLOL!!!
I haven't had this much fun in awhile! PLEASE don't do anything to get yourself banned! This stuff is PRICELESS!!!LOLOL!!! :thumbright:

"Cheesey" wrote:





Squirm and Dodge Cheesey

How come Ted doesn't suck and Snyder does when they are even in the W-L category?
blank
djcubez
15 years ago

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"dd80forever" wrote:




Yet when faced with the FACT that Snyder has a better record over the last 4 years then Ted Thompson has it reverts to mumbling about traveling comedy shows.

I love watching people squirm. It's funny. What no facts to back anything up?

"djcubez" wrote:


I didn't even see you post any evidence of you're so-called "facts."

2005: Pack (4-12) Redskins (10-6)
2006: Pack (8-8) Redskins (5-11)
2007: Pack (13-3) Redskins (9-7)
2008: Pack (6-10) Redskins (8-8)

Packers (31-33) Redskins (32-32). You were correct in saying the Redskins had the better record but by one win? Oh yea, let's add this year and the Packers are on top. Not to mention that the Packers (4-2) are a youthful team that's just now developing into the team they've been built to be while the Redskins (2-5) are doing terrible and have a power struggle in the coaches office.

"dd80forever" wrote:




LOL, Which path to failure is better? 2 different approaches 1 result......mediocrity.

Yet when it's another teams mediocrity it's "they suck"

When it's your team it's "they have potential"

I was unaware the Redskins didn't have any "potential" on their team.

Yes and you win.......if you include this seasonthe Packers are 1 game above the Skins in the last 4 years..........Oh Thank God. 1 game better than the guy who "sucks". I feel so much better now.

"Cheesey" wrote:



What? First you state that Snyder has a better record than Thompson when in fact HE DOESN'T. You posted an outright lie. But instead of taking fault for it you just find another way to rag on the Packers. Seriously man, WHAT THE FUCK IS YOUR PROBLEM?

Packers definitely have more potential. They have a team on the rise. The Redskins have less. They have a team that's about to fire their head coach. Look at it anyway you want, the Packers are going up while the Redskins are heading down, unless they can turn it around quick.
British
15 years ago

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"dd80forever" wrote:




Yet when faced with the FACT that Snyder has a better record over the last 4 years then Ted Thompson has it reverts to mumbling about traveling comedy shows.

I love watching people squirm. It's funny. What no facts to back anything up?

"Cheesey" wrote:


Squirm???LOLOL!!! Seriously.....STOP IT!!!! Your comedy show is killing me!!!LOLOLOL!!!
I haven't had this much fun in awhile! PLEASE don't do anything to get yourself banned! This stuff is PRICELESS!!!LOLOL!!! :thumbright:

"dd80forever" wrote:





Squirm and Dodge Cheesey

How come Ted doesn't suck and Snyder does when they are even in the W-L category?

"Cheesey" wrote:



Because we're not simpletons that's why.
dd80forever
15 years ago

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"djcubez" wrote:




Yet when faced with the FACT that Snyder has a better record over the last 4 years then Ted Thompson has it reverts to mumbling about traveling comedy shows.

I love watching people squirm. It's funny. What no facts to back anything up?

"dd80forever" wrote:


I didn't even see you post any evidence of you're so-called "facts."

2005: Pack (4-12) Redskins (10-6)
2006: Pack (8-8) Redskins (5-11)
2007: Pack (13-3) Redskins (9-7)
2008: Pack (6-10) Redskins (8-8)

Packers (31-33) Redskins (32-32). You were correct in saying the Redskins had the better record but by one win? Oh yea, let's add this year and the Packers are on top. Not to mention that the Packers (4-2) are a youthful team that's just now developing into the team they've been built to be while the Redskins (2-5) are doing terrible and have a power struggle in the coaches office.

"djcubez" wrote:




LOL, Which path to failure is better? 2 different approaches 1 result......mediocrity.

Yet when it's another teams mediocrity it's "they suck"

When it's your team it's "they have potential"

I was unaware the Redskins didn't have any "potential" on their team.

Yes and you win.......if you include this seasonthe Packers are 1 game above the Skins in the last 4 years..........Oh Thank God. 1 game better than the guy who "sucks". I feel so much better now.

"dd80forever" wrote:



What? First you state that Snyder has a better record than Thompson when in fact HE DOESN'T. You posted an outright lie. But instead of taking fault for it you just find another way to rag on the Packers. Seriously man, WHAT THE FUCK IS YOUR PROBLEM?

Packers definitely have more potential. They have a team on the rise. The Redskins have less. They have a team that's about to fire their head coach. Look at it anyway you want, the Packers are going up while the Redskins are heading down, unless they can turn it around quick.

"Cheesey" wrote:




I wasn't figuring in this year......sorry.

We always have talent and are on the rise.......yet it never happens
blank
dd80forever
15 years ago

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"British" wrote:




Yet when faced with the FACT that Snyder has a better record over the last 4 years then Ted Thompson has it reverts to mumbling about traveling comedy shows.

I love watching people squirm. It's funny. What no facts to back anything up?

"dd80forever" wrote:


Squirm???LOLOL!!! Seriously.....STOP IT!!!! Your comedy show is killing me!!!LOLOLOL!!!
I haven't had this much fun in awhile! PLEASE don't do anything to get yourself banned! This stuff is PRICELESS!!!LOLOL!!! :thumbright:

"Cheesey" wrote:





Squirm and Dodge Cheesey

How come Ted doesn't suck and Snyder does when they are even in the W-L category?

"dd80forever" wrote:



Because we're not simpletons that's why.

"Cheesey" wrote:




aka: I don't have any ammo for my gun
blank
dhazer
15 years ago
We have spent 3 pages of comparing ourselves to the Redskins omfg don't that make me feel good.


I have to give the nod to DDforver because he gave you guys proof and you guys couldn't do anything but say we have potential. I say screw potential i want wins on the field.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
blueleopard
15 years ago
What's the farthest a Snyder-led team got to in the playoffs?

What's the farthest a Thompson-led team got to in the playoffs?

Once you have the answer, stop arguing.
Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings
go.pack.go.
15 years ago
dd80, you shouldn't even be posting on this forum, you should be following the Vikings bus! You're already in Brett Favre's JOCK!

So, how does it feel being the biggest follower on earth? You would be a Raider fan for Christ's sake if Brett Favre played for them.

I say screw you dd80 and get off of this board. It doesn't seem like you're a Packer fan. Just look at your avatar, and you will see an untrue fan. (Sorry about that).

--Sorry for overreacting (If you want to call it that), but I'm tired of this guy going on his rants against the Packers just because he's in Brett's jock and Brett no longer plays for the Packers.

Oh and by the way - nothing personal, you just piss me off, a LOT.
Fan Shout
dfosterf (10m) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (11m) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (1h) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (1h) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (1h) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (1h) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (1h) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (1h) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (1h) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (1h) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (1h) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (2h) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (2h) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (2h) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (2h) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (3h) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (3h) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (3h) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (19h) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : uh oh
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

25-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.