The grass is always greener...· Page 4

mi_keys
Senior Member

15 years ago

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"dd80forever" wrote:

Yet when faced with the FACT that Snyder has a better record over the last 4 years then Ted Thompson has it reverts to mumbling about traveling comedy shows.

I love watching people squirm. It's funny. What no facts to back anything up?

"djcubez" wrote:

I didn't even see you post any evidence of you're so-called "facts."

2005: Pack (4-12) Redskins (10-6)
2006: Pack (8-8) Redskins (5-11)
2007: Pack (13-3) Redskins (9-7)
2008: Pack (6-10) Redskins (8-8)

Packers (31-33) Redskins (32-32). You were correct in saying the Redskins had the better record but by one win? Oh yea, let's add this year and the Packers are on top. Not to mention that the Packers (4-2) are a youthful team that's just now developing into the team they've been built to be while the Redskins (2-5) are doing terrible and have a power struggle in the coaches office.

"dd80forever" wrote:

LOL, Which path to failure is better? 2 different approaches 1 result......mediocrity.

Yet when it's another teams mediocrity it's "they suck"

When it's your team it's "they have potential"

I was unaware the Redskins didn't have any "potential" on their team.

Yes and you win.......if you include this seasonthe Packers are 1 game above the Skins in the last 4 years..........Oh Thank God. 1 game better than the guy who "sucks". I feel so much better now.

"Cheesey" wrote:

Over the four year span that you initially cited Minnesota's record was 33-31 (1 game better than the Redskins at 32-32). I don't see you calling for Rick Spielman's head. I guess that 1 game better than the guy who sucks actually did make you feel much better!

Born and bred a cheesehead

Cheesey
Preferred Member

15 years ago

#32

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"dd80forever" wrote:

"Cheesey" wrote:

Squirm???LOLOL!!! Seriously.....STOP IT!!!! Your comedy show is killing me!!!LOLOLOL!!!
I haven't had this much fun in awhile! PLEASE don't do anything to get yourself banned! This stuff is PRICELESS!!!LOLOL!!! :thumbright:

dd80forever
Registered

15 years ago

#33

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"Cheesey" wrote:

"dd80forever" wrote:

"Cheesey" wrote:

Squirm and Dodge Cheesey

How come Ted doesn't suck and Snyder does when they are even in the W-L category?

blank

djcubez
Senior Member

15 years ago

#34

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"dd80forever" wrote:

"djcubez" wrote:

"dd80forever" wrote:

"Cheesey" wrote:

What? First you state that Snyder has a better record than Thompson when in fact HE DOESN'T. You posted an outright lie. But instead of taking fault for it you just find another way to rag on the Packers. Seriously man, WHAT THE FUCK IS YOUR PROBLEM?

Packers definitely have more potential. They have a team on the rise. The Redskins have less. They have a team that's about to fire their head coach. Look at it anyway you want, the Packers are going up while the Redskins are heading down, unless they can turn it around quick.

British
Registered

15 years ago

#35

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"dd80forever" wrote:

"Cheesey" wrote:

"dd80forever" wrote:

Squirm and Dodge Cheesey

How come Ted doesn't suck and Snyder does when they are even in the W-L category?

"Cheesey" wrote:

Because we're not simpletons that's why.

dd80forever
Registered

15 years ago

#36

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"djcubez" wrote:

"dd80forever" wrote:

"djcubez" wrote:

"dd80forever" wrote:

"Cheesey" wrote:

I wasn't figuring in this year......sorry.

We always have talent and are on the rise.......yet it never happens

blank

dd80forever
Registered

15 years ago

#37

When asked if Snyder was a good GM?

Answer is, NO.

"British" wrote:

"dd80forever" wrote:

"Cheesey" wrote:

Squirm and Dodge Cheesey

How come Ted doesn't suck and Snyder does when they are even in the W-L category?

"dd80forever" wrote:

Because we're not simpletons that's why.

"Cheesey" wrote:

aka: I don't have any ammo for my gun

blank

dhazer
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#38

We have spent 3 pages of comparing ourselves to the Redskins omfg don't that make me feel good.

I have to give the nod to DDforver because he gave you guys proof and you guys couldn't do anything but say we have potential. I say screw potential i want wins on the field.

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

blueleopard
Member

15 years ago

#39

What's the farthest a Snyder-led team got to in the playoffs?

What's the farthest a Thompson-led team got to in the playoffs?

Once you have the answer, stop arguing.

Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#40

dd80, you shouldn't even be posting on this forum, you should be following the Vikings bus! You're already in Brett Favre's JOCK!

So, how does it feel being the biggest follower on earth? You would be a Raider fan for Christ's sake if Brett Favre played for them.

I say screw you dd80 and get off of this board. It doesn't seem like you're a Packer fan. Just look at your avatar, and you will see an untrue fan. (Sorry about that).

--Sorry for overreacting (If you want to call it that), but I'm tired of this guy going on his rants against the Packers just because he's in Brett's jock and Brett no longer plays for the Packers.

Oh and by the way - nothing personal, you just piss me off, a LOT.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (1h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (1h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (1h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (1h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (1h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (1h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (1h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (1h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (2h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (3h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (3h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (3h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (3h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (3h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (4h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (4h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (4h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (5h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (5h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (5h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (5h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (5h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (6h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (6h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (7h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (7h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (8h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (8h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (8h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (8h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (8h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (8h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (8h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (8h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (8h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (8h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (8h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (8h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (8h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (8h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (8h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (8h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (8h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (9h) : Packers will get in

beast (9h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS