Anyone else scared about this Sidney Rice kid? I don't know if its just a lucky streak or something but he has been on fire. He seems to always find the open area and even when he doesn't he makes great catches in one on one coverage. But he doesn't even seem that fast, he's just a good "throw it up, he'll get it WR".

Berriman is out hopefully too? Any word on him?

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:

Anyone else scared about this Sidney Rice kid? I don't know if its just a lucky streak or something but he has been on fire. He seems to always find the open area and even when he doesn't he makes great catches in one on one coverage. But he doesn't even seem that fast, he's just a good "throw it up, he'll get it WR".

Berriman is out hopefully too? Any word on him?

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:

I think that works better the other way around. If we're winning, Grant runs the ball at least 16 times.

"Rockmolder" wrote:

Favre will have to deal with the noise this time. In MInn, Rodgers had to deal with it.

"Cheesey" wrote:

... and to this point ...


Allow me to introduce myself to you. I'm Kevin, I'm kind of the founder of this website, somewhat of the one who created it. One of my many goals for this site was to talk Packers, be an outlet for Packers talk for a few people. With that said, I don't really care about helping other teams fans get over their loss. We're not trying to move past our win, we're trying to find some positives, negatives, etc. Then gradually transition into the next game.

.bitch.


:)

"Formo" wrote:

'sigh'

Thanks Formo, you ruined the theme.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Yes, that is wrong.

I have a football injury as do several other people on this board. I wouldn't wish it on anybody, even somebody I was really pissed off at.

Formo - Before the season started, I said we'd split with you guys, sweep da Bears, and shut out 2 opponents. I also said before the first game that whomever wins that game loses the next one (obviously).

I don't think it's going to be close. Sorry, buddy. With all due respect, I don't. I think we'll put up an early lead and force you guys to play catch up. Rodgers will play with a vengeance like you've never seen him before and Driver will light it up in GB.

The score will more likely be 37-24, except as close as those numbers are, several of your scores are meaningless late 4th Q scores.

"nerdmann" wrote:

Packers will need to intercept Favre a couple times to clinch this one. Minnesotans found out last game about the heartbreak of the game changing fumble and the game losing interceptions that Favre provided for the Packers fans for 15 or so years.

"obi1" wrote:

Wait. How come you have negative applause points?

"Rockmolder" wrote:

Don't you have a merge option as the site leader? =P

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

All mod's and admin's have the capability to merge a thread. However, none of us have the ability to go back in time and change the date so this one doesn't precede the real one after being merged.

It's really not that big of a deal. The official thread contains the information needed. This thread here just gives me reason to make everyone think I'm SUPER DUPER pissed off!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mainly, it gives me valid reason to call you names, like a little child would do. :)

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

You needed a valid reason to act the way you normally do? Weird. =P

"Formo" wrote: