Pack93z
15 years ago
I think it is almost improbable to fire Campen currently, it should have been done this offseason with the house cleaning. It is what it is..

But that doesn't mean that you can't add some experience to help his ass out and start a foothold of moving away from Campen.

He has been given many a player and plenty of time to prove his worth as a "touted" coach.. it isn't working. Period.

Many complained of Sherman's cronyism in refusing to make changes in the staff when things started to fall apart.. it is pretty freaking apparent that Mike McCarthy plays his favorites as well.. even for the worse of the team.

The regime preaches that they do what is best for the team, then do it. Get some help in here both on the field and on the sidelines to get this offensive line heading in the right direction.

It is no time for silly pride or "I think" statements.

Boot Breno to the PS.. sign another tackle that just might suit up on Sunday's to give ourselves a plan B in case Lang struggles.. we are about a week or two away from having at the very least serviceable depth at Right tackle.. please don't make an error going into the next two weeks without at least some hope for an option on the left side.

I have faith in Lang.. but without a net? Not when we need every win we can get.

Now is the time... no more waiting for this or that.. get it freaking done.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
IronMan
  • IronMan
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago

I think it is almost improbable to fire Campen currently, it should have been done this offseason with the house cleaning. It is what it is..

"pack93z" wrote:


Why? What is so wrong with firing a coach mid season? And more importantly, how does waiting til the end of the season to fire him help the team?
Stevetarded
15 years ago
Is there even a coach on our team that has experience running the ZBS successfully? I thought SF ran a power run offense even when McCarthy was coaching there.
blank
15 years ago
you know it's bad when...


...


...i actually cheered when Clifton got hurt.

I agree with Twinkiegorilla.

bozz_2006 wrote:


Zero2Cool
15 years ago

you know it's bad when...


...


...i actually cheered when Clifton got hurt.

"TwinkieGorilla" wrote:



Not really. You're kind of a cold-hearted person so it's expected.


I will say, I was glad to see Lang play. I think I am going to like this kid.
UserPostedImage
15 years ago


Not really. You're kind of a cold-hearted person so it's expected.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



a cold hearted person who just sent a dozen roses to his girlfriend's work-place for her birthday. :thumbleft:

I agree with Twinkiegorilla.

bozz_2006 wrote:


Zero2Cool
15 years ago


Not really. You're kind of a cold-hearted person so it's expected.

"TwinkieGorilla" wrote:



a cold hearted person who just sent a dozen roses to his girlfriend's work-place for her birthday. :thumbleft:

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


Correction. A cold-hearted person who wants to get laid this week.

Seriously, you're not going to win this. Move on. 🙂
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
15 years ago

I think it is almost improbable to fire Campen currently, it should have been done this offseason with the house cleaning. It is what it is..

"IronMan" wrote:


Why? What is so wrong with firing a coach mid season? And more importantly, how does waiting til the end of the season to fire him help the team?

"pack93z" wrote:



Because this regime is resistant stubborn and adjusts slowly.. could it be done and effectively? Yes, but not with this plodding group.

But maybe they would be open to adding another set of eyes.. I don't know.. maybe I am becoming to cold to this group.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
IronMan
  • IronMan
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago

I think it is almost improbable to fire Campen currently, it should have been done this offseason with the house cleaning. It is what it is..

"pack93z" wrote:


Why? What is so wrong with firing a coach mid season? And more importantly, how does waiting til the end of the season to fire him help the team?

"IronMan" wrote:



Because this regime is resistant stubborn and adjusts slowly.. could it be done and effectively? Yes, but not with this plodding group.

But maybe they would be open to adding another set of eyes.. I don't know.. maybe I am becoming to cold to this group.

"pack93z" wrote:



I agree that they are slow to adjust. But it does seem to be a popular opinion that you shouldn't fire a coach mid season. I wonder why that is? I even hear "experts" say this all the time. What is so taboo about mid season firings?
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
When I think of our OL and OL staff ...

Reporter: What do you think about your teams execution?

And in the words of John, I'm all in favor of it.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (1m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (12m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (58m) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (59m) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (59m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (4h) : Packers will get in
beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.