Porforis
15 years ago

We had tons of yards. Big deal. We scored 36 points. Big deal. Take out the Jennings 80+, the Grant TD, Rodgers scramble and what do you get?


300 yards passing for 2 TD's. That is not good enough passing production. You have to keep passing for play action to work. McCarthy is terrible play calling. He is fine a times a bad at times. And seems to be bad in big games.

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:



If you selectively delete big stats from each game, you will have pretty unimpressive numbers. Every team/player's stats will be bolstered by 1 or 2 big plays, but it doesn't mean you disregard them!

The packers moved the ball effectively in the 2nd half, scored 22 points in the 4th quarter, and handed the defense a very winnable situation. Should the packers run just for the sake of saying 'hey, look...look, we attempted a balenced attack, give us a pat on the back!' The steelers ratio was 46:19, so is their playcaller a hack as well?

"musccy" wrote:



I am not happy about the defense either, but that isn't the subject of this thread, neither is Mason, or Bush or Bell. It is about McCarthy and his responsibility is scoring points. We scored points but we also left a bunch on the field. Running the ball, scores points 14 in the game including Rodgers. Running the ball opens up the pass with play action, keeping the LBers and SS from dropping deep into the passing lanes. And Running the ball keeps Rodgers from getting killed.

Just because there was some success, does not mean we couldn't have had more. And taking out plays out of the ordinary shows the normal produciton. If Grant runs 8 times for 0 yards, then 1 for 90, he is not a 10 yard per play runner. He is a 0 YPC back that breaks one sometimes.

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:



Every team leaves points on the field, every game. We scored 36 points and should have scored 39 if not for Crosbyfail. At what point do you have to stop saying "Well, we could have/should have scored more points" and stop blaming the coach? It's not MM's fault that so many balls were dropped (that ended up stalling a lot of the drives), and it's not his fault Crosby missed, and it's not his fault that Rodgers was throwing wild the first drive or two.

Running the ball just wasn't working in this game. I'm sorry, but there's no way we would have scored more points relative to the Steelers (since there'd probably be less possessions in the game) by running the ball. We had all kinds of success in the air, and most of our lack of success was not due to great coverage, it was due to drops and Rodgersfail early in the game. Bringing a safety into the box wouldn't have done much for us, we were already having our way with them. The PA pass wouldn't have done much more of anything for us, even if we did set it up and they did bite.

Sorry, I simply wouldn't agree with many more runs than we did beyond for the sake of surprising them. Maybe 3-5 more tops.
PackFanWithTwins
15 years ago
How can we say the run wasn't working. Grant got the ball 4 times in the 2nd half. 2 were the first two plays in the half for us. The remaining time, we ran twice with Grant and one was a 24 yard TD.

If I don't try to turn my car on, how can I say it doesn't run?

Notice the beginning of the game. two drives, both 3 and out, then we run Grant twice and hit Jennings for 83. That wasn't even play action, is was just the effect of having to worry even a little about the RB in the back field.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Porforis
15 years ago

How can we say the run wasn't working. Grant got the ball 4 times in the 2nd half. 2 were the first two plays in the half for us. The remaining time, we ran twice with Grant and one was a 24 yard TD.

If I don't try to turn my car on, how can I say it doesn't run?

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:



Why bother trying to turn your car on when your helicopter is warmed up and waiting? The passing game, minus the drops, was working as well as I've ever seen it. We were averaging 7.98 yards per pass ATTEMPT, and we were averaging 4.2 yards per called run. Take away the longest run and the longest completion, and you have 6.38 yards per pass attempt and 1.55 yards per called run. If you're averaging 6.38 yards per pass attempt, why the hell would you run hardly at all, much less if you're averaging 8? I guarantee you that if Grant would have gotten 20 more carries, he would have never bumped that 4.2 yards/carry up any higher.

Notice the beginning of the game. two drives, both 3 and out, then we run Grant twice and hit Jennings for 83. That wasn't even play action, is was just the effect of having to worry even a little about the RB in the back field.

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:



While I don't agree with all the 5 man sets we were using ALL FREAKING GAME (seriously, at least make them have to worry about the RB catching a pass out of the backfield), you can't blame the first two drives on too many pass plays. Rodgers was overthrowing EVERYTHING. That's why we started running more, then we took a shot downfield and scored. We might have ran more the next possession, but after that Rodgers began executing consistently, and we stuck with what was working. I fail to see the problem. Of all the things you could bitch about in this game, passing too much isn't really one of them.
Cheesey
15 years ago
The drops cost us alot too.
Our WR's have been BAD in that department this year.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
15 years ago

The drops cost us alot too.
Our WR's have been BAD in that department this year.

"Cheesey" wrote:



I noticed this too. What's with all the drops these past few weeks? I think this week was our worst. The normally dependable Driver had a lot of drops the past 2 weeks.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
musccy
15 years ago
great posts porforis. Balance is great and all, but it was a shoot-out game that the packers kept pace in. Also, steelers were 46:19 in favor of the pass and won but nobody is complaining about their playcalling.

In this particular game, the pass was working very effectively so I don't see why we need to 'fire M. M.' because he stuck with it.
zombieslayer
15 years ago

great posts porforis. Balance is great and all, but it was a shoot-out game that the packers kept pace in. Also, steelers were 46:19 in favor of the pass and won but nobody is complaining about their playcalling.

In this particular game, the pass was working very effectively so I don't see why we need to 'fire M. M.' because he stuck with it.

"musccy" wrote:


Mike McCarthy did fine. He got us 36 points.

The culprit of this game is Dom Capers. He was rushing 3 guys all night long and allowed Ben to get his team 37 points.

Screw balance. Do what works. Aaron kicked ass and almost had 400 yards with his 3 TDs + 1 running.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago

Rodgers was overthrowing EVERYTHING.

"Porforis" wrote:



Can you blame him? He was knocked down 5 times in his first 13 dropbacks, and a couple of those hits were brutal. Blame for this lies squarely on the offensive line.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
15 years ago

Wow, somebody knew that McCarthy was going to call 9 runs to 48 passes.

"evad04" wrote:


[...facepalm...]
Yeah, it was the lack of running game that beat us today ... not the 500 yards passing we gave up. If only we'd run more against Pittsburgh -- who gives up 3.6 yards per carry -- then we'd have won.

For that matter, we were similarly dominant in defense. Gotta hand it to the d in that regard -- they don't give up big rushing performances.

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:



So not having offensive balance and controlling the ball didn't play into the outcome?

If you have a defense that is being attacked effectively, one of the simplest things you can do to assist is keep them off the field with a more methodical attack.. which would require a more clock draining running game.

Shorten up the amount of time the opposition has the ball and it directly will impact the performance of your defense.

The Steelers had the blueprint to our defense as we had one for theirs.. so I hold little worry about a defensive collapse past this week.

However.. I have concerns about a inconsistent running game/ abandoning the run and our ability to consistently catch passes on offense.. along with the sheer lack of discipline in regards to penalties.. those three things I worry about come playoff time.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (14-Feb) : Packers are hiring Luke Getsy as senior offensive assistant.
Martha Careful (12-Feb) : I would love to have them both, esp. Crosby, but either might be too expensive.
Zero2Cool (12-Feb) : Keisean Nixon is trying to get Maxx Crosby and Davante Adams lol
Mucky Tundra (11-Feb) : Yeah where did it go?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : or did you resctrict access to that topic?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : why did you remove the Playoff topic?
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Tua’s old DC won a Super Bowl Year 1 with Tua’s former backup
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : *winning MVP
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Funny observation I've heard: Carson Wentz was on the sideline for both Eagles Super Bowl wins w/guys supposed to be his back up winning
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : NFL thought it would get more attention week preceding Super Bowl.
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Yes, the Pro Bowl. It was played Sunday before Super Bowl from 2010-2022
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : pro bowl
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : From 2010 to 2022, it was played on the Sunday before the Super Bowl
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : They moved it to the BYE week before Super Bowl several years ago.
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : it was always after the SB.....
beast (10-Feb) : Though I stop following pro bowl years ago
beast (10-Feb) : I thought the pro game was before the Super Bowl?
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : ok now for the Pro Bowl Game in Hawaii
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : If I was Philly I would try to end it instead of punting it
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : VICTORY! We have (moral) victory!
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : Hey they mentioned that we 3-peted
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : seems to me the 49ers should have traded Aiyuk when they had the chance
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : if the Eagles get it down to the 1, do they Tush Push or give it to Barkley?
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : 49ers have a money problem if they want to sign their QB
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Wait for real? Didn't he just get an extension two years ago?
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : 49ers gonna trade Deebo. Interesting
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : Replays always never seem to show the holdings
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : Great throw by Hurts
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Where Carter falls prey to bad off the field influences (to be clear, not saying he'd clip someone though)
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Had Carter not gone to Philly were they already had a lot of old college friends, he ends up in a similar spot to Aaron Hernandez
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : I think some of his coaches told scouts to stay away
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : the street racing incident+conditioning and motivation problems
beast (10-Feb) : Then Carter was street racing, where the other car crashed and people died... and other teams were scared to pick Carter for some reason
beast (10-Feb) : I think the Saints traded up, giving their next year 1st to the Eagles, and then they sucked and Eagles got the 10th overall pick
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : wtf Barkley?
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : Getting Carter and Nolan Smith in the first round in 2023 was pretty darn good
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : for some reason i'm thinking of a draft where the Eagles where in the mid 20s and a top player fell all the way to them
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : I think so. I would need to look it up. Think it may have been Carolina's pick.
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : i'm not sure who i'm thinking of now
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : oh fuck me i messed that up
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Jordan Davis was 13th overall
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Carter was 9th overall
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Eagles had 15th and 10th selections, moved to 13 and 9 to get Davis and Carter back to back
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Eagles traded up for Carter, didn't they?
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Obviously he was a huge risk but getting a top 5 talent on the dline in the mid 20s is fortuitous
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Jalen Carter falling into their lap certainly helps
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : And we could only wish to have this type of D
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : It's not like Philly has had low draft picks, but has managed to get themselves a top notch pass rush. We spend so much draft capital of D
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : another crap halftime show
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : I think it is over, but then I think of Atlanta and want Philly to go in with the same intensity in the second half
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
1h / Around The NFL / beast

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

15-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

15-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13-Feb / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

10-Feb / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

10-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

9-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

7-Feb / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

4-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.