I will say this. After four games, I'd rather have taken my chances with Sutton instead of Wynn and Smith instead of DeGironardo (its not DELIEVERY) at safety.
"Zero2Cool" wrote:
In the end, that is the bare bones truth, and why I personally think in the Smith case it was a mistake.
No one is calling Smith a savior, at least I am not, but if he makes one less mistake or one play a game, how much does that impact the overall team?
IMO, at this level, the NFL, the difference between player A or player B is maybe a play or two a game on an individual level, excluding the QB. You can compound that on defense, where each player is relied upon with in the scheme in pass coverage.
IE.. Maybe Smith is where he should have been verse Martin sitting dead center on the Berrian TD.. bare minimum is maybe he saves a TD.. best case is he causes a pick. Most likely either a mid range gain or an incomplete.. we have no way of knowing how that changes a game. Or maybe he blows the coverage as well.. we will never know.
But if we are going to play that unknown card, then it ends a bulk of discussion on these types of boards because the variables are endless in this game. Game of inches.
I am tried of rehashing it.. in the end, I would have rather seen Smith in the game than any day Bush is relied upon in the base defense deep responsibility. Period.
Back to topic, I wasn't barking, I was just noting that 40 speed is vastly over rated IMO when judging a player.. give me a player than can play over a workout warrior.. Sutton may never have been a superstar, but the question currently would he be better than Wynn, Jackson or maybe even Grant in toting the rock.
We need to win now.. anything that may help us now or has been done this season is being judged, it is a performance based league.
Why focus on the past, because it is apparent this staff is stubborn as hell and change is rare.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"