dfosterf
  • dfosterf
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago
Article 

With the Gophers in their new football stadium and the Twins leaving the Metrodome this weekend, the Vikings would like your attention.

And your money.

The Vikings and the Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission, which owns and operates the Metrodome, are ready to ask Minnesotans for at least $700 million to subsidize a new, improved NFL stadium with a retractable roof being called Metrodome Next that will sit on the current site.

"If the answer is no," Vikings vice president for public affairs and stadium development Lester Bagley said, "then why would you own a team in this market?"



We have a new member here. He is a Vikings fan, obviously. His first post was along the lines of, "The only way you win that game is to pray."

Or something like that. He might be right, he might be wrong.

If I were that poster, I might do a little praying of my own.

Some answers are tentatively scheduled for 2 minutes from this post.

Might be more than a little interesting, and if they run things like our pressers, answers might be a tad bit later than that. :thumbleft:

I have gone on record as saying I would not be for the Vikings leaving Minnesota, but then again, I don't have to put up with them :thumbleft:

I do wonder though. On the same day that this is published...

Link 

"Minnesota people are cheap people," Holzberger said. "They are bringing the price down."




...that from a ticket broker talking about the soft market for sales in this (arguably huge) game.

Will Wilf and co. just say to hell with Minnesota and their fans?

They do put a great product out there, yet STILL do not receive the support needed.

This could be interesting.

Are Minnesota folk cheap or is all about the economy? Seems like a very broad generalization, but then again, where is the new stadium, then? I do not know.
Rockmolder
15 years ago
Vikings and Mall of America Announce Naming Right Partnership 

Eden Prairie, MN The Minnesota Vikings and Mall of America announced today a partnership for the naming rights to the field that has served as the teams home since 1982. The agreement, announced this morning from the Vikings Winter Park facility, provides that the field will be called Mall of America Field at Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome for a three-year period beginning October 5, 2009, and ending February 28, 2012.

dfosterf
  • dfosterf
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago
Well, that's boring.

I wonder at what point they are going to issue the "ultimatum"?

Lease runs out when, 2010, 20111?

Florio said something about this also:

Vikings begin final push for new stadium 

Posted by Mike Florio on October 1, 2009 9:56 AM ET
With an undefeated team, the best running back in the game, a stifling defense, and a Hall of Fame quarterback who in four days will face for the first time the franchise with which he spent 16 seasons, there's no time like the present to try to get some public money for a new football stadium in Minnesota.

Or, as the case may be, a lot of public money.

And if the present effort doesn't work, there might be no future.

The Vikings will ask taxpayers for $700 million to build a new venue at the site of the current Metrodome.

The place would be called "Metrodome Next" [editor's note: lame], and it would include a retractable roof. (There's also talk of building a facility with no lid, which would restore a true home-field advantage to the team.)

Vikings exec Lester Bagley had an ominous message to those who'll be considering the request: "If the answer is no," Bagley told the St. Paul Pioneer Press, "then why would you own a team in this market?"

This can be interpreted two ways. First, without a new stadium, owner Zygi Wilf will sell the team. Second, without a new stadium, owner Zygi Wilf will move the team.

And it likely would be moved to the Los Angeles area, where Ed Roski is moving forward with a new stadium in the city of Industry.

The locals, however, don't seem ready to budge.


"Governor [Tim] Pawlenty believes the Vikings are an important Minnesota institution and asset. We want to see the Vikings stay in Minnesota," Pawlenty spokesman Brian McClung told the Pioneer Press. "But the state has to prioritize limited resources, and as we look ahead to the 2010 legislative session, state funding for a new stadium is not high on the list."
Meanwhile, the other regular tenants are leaving the Metrodome. The Minnesota Twins have a new stadium that opens next season. And the Minnesota Golden Gophers already are playing in their own new open-air digs. The Vikings' lease expires after the 2011 season.
"When we get to 2010, we have 20 games left at the Metrodome, and the clock is ticking," Bagley said.

"The state can't afford us to become free agents."

The problem, as we see it, is that the Vikings have been making subtle threats about moving for more than a decade, and folks in Minnesota possibly believe it's all a bluff.

We've got a strong feeling that it isn't.

And so, just as Minneapolis lost the Lakers to L.A. all those years ago, the Vikings could be the next purple-and-gold Minnesota product to load up the truck and move to Beverly.


Cheesey
  • Cheesey
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Preferred Member
15 years ago
Well....if they don't get what they want, Ziggy will pack them up and move.
UserPostedImage
Formo
  • Formo
  • 61.75% (Friendly)
  • Veteran Member
15 years ago
To answer your question, Foster.. Yes. Minnesota people are cheap. Lester Bagley was on KFAN here in Minneapolis this morning, and him and the host, Paul Allen, were talking about this issue. My uncle and I were listening to it, and I was listening to his reactions. Although he's a Minnesota sports fan, he seems more than content on losing the Vikings if it means the state doesn't have to put in any sort of significant money.

Personally, I don't care how much the state kicks in, I want to see a deal done. I pay taxes for crap I never use (like a new theater and public library in downtown Minneapolis), so why the Hell shouldn't I be willing to pay a little bit more taxes for a stadium that I will enjoy? This past election, there was a state amendment on raising state-wide taxes a certain fraction of a percent (I think it was .02%) for something to do with Wildlife Preservation, and they projected that the first year income just from that tax amendment would be about $200 million or so. It's called the Minnesota Vikings (contrary to what Greta says.. The Minneapolis Vikings), so why can't they do something like that, with a promisory note attached that said once the new stadium was paid off, the tax would disappear? Or, I saw somewhere that Wilf was willing to put down a percentage of the total cost of a new stadium (not including a roof).. Why can't he put down a bit more? Like 50%? I mean, they DID say something like they could build a new, roofless stadium that would cost only $600 or so million. Why not that plan with a potential to build a retractable roof? (Keep in mind that the state wants a roof for multi-sport purposes)

I don't have the answers, and my 'solutions' aren't very realistic. I know this. I just want a deal done so I don't have to go through what Cleveland or Houston had to go through.. Just to get a horsecrap expansion team.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Wade
  • Wade
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Veteran Member
15 years ago
Let me ask people this question.

Suppose you have 700 million to invest. Would *you* invest it in a sports stadium?

And if the answer is "no", why should taxpayer dollars be used to do it?

Seriously.

If a sports stadium is such a bloody great investment, why in the world do rich people with 700 million not come forward with the funds?

Seriously.

I say all this as someone who would be sad to see the Vikings move from Minnesota. And as someone who thinks "politician makes a smart decision" an oxymoron.

But a politician who says no to such things is correct.

The best thing that happened to Chicago's economy in the last couple weeks is LOSING on the Olympic bid.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Formo
  • Formo
  • 61.75% (Friendly)
  • Veteran Member
15 years ago

Let me ask people this question.

Suppose you have 700 million to invest. Would *you* invest it in a sports stadium?

And if the answer is "no", why should taxpayer dollars be used to do it?

Seriously.

If a sports stadium is such a bloody great investment, why in the world do rich people with 700 million not come forward with the funds?

Seriously.

I say all this as someone who would be sad to see the Vikings move from Minnesota. And as someone who thinks "politician makes a smart decision" an oxymoron.

But a politician who says no to such things is correct.

The best thing that happened to Chicago's economy in the last couple weeks is LOSING on the Olympic bid.

"Wade" wrote:



You are assuming that we as the millionaires actually have the $700 million just sitting around with nothing better to be done with.

That's all fine and dandy if an owner chooses to invest his $700 million into his own stadium. Here's the catch, if that were to happen, then the state government can keep it's damn greedy paws off any sort of income made from said stadium.

Did you know that the state of Minnesota has made over $200 million in taxes just from the Vikings alone in the past 20+ years the Vikings have been in the dome? That's the same Viking team who's revenue has been deep in the lower half of all NFL teams. And the state had made over $200 million just from the taxes alone. Not including the booze tax that they charge for the building of the Humpty Dump (which, by the way, has been paid off for many years now.. Yet we still get charged that tax.. Hmmmmm..)

We have to face it.. The state will not not tax the Vikings if they fund their own stadium. The state WILL make a shitton of money due to the presence of the Vikings. Having an NFL team in a market as big as the Twin Cities is a BONUS to said metro's economy, not a burden. Helloooo.. Jobs anyone? We aren't even bringing up the influx of commerce that traveling fans/teams brings to the local economy, but it would be foolish to think that they don't have any sort of impact. Like I said.. I don't care how it's done, just figure something out. The state screwed over the Vikings and themselves by pushing stadium talks back year after year after year after year. Now, they are facing a rude fact that, yes, they WILL have to put money into a deal for them to have/keep an NFL team.

I get it.. "RICH MAN HAS MUNEYS, HE BUILDS HIS OWN HOUSE" If only it were that simple. Everyone assume's the Wilf's and their investors crap Benjys. That's not the case, and the sooner the state and it's people realize this, the sooner they'll be open to sitting down and actually being open to proposals.

I'm sorry, but I blame the state for this issue more so than the Vikings and their ownership. Yes, both need to work things out, and both need to be willing to make a deal. But from what I'm seeing, only the Vikings have been proactive on this subject for years. Has this government NOT learned from the North Stars/Wild thing? They ended up putting money down for the Xcel Center to be built... Which was the same type of thing the North Stars asked for. Just a drive through St. Paul will tell you about how good that area is and how friendly it now is.

Definition of insanity: Doing the same thing, over and over, yet expecting a different result.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
The margin on an NFL franchise is amazingly low. (Fiscally naive people see the raw numbers -- "Jerry Jones made $10 million last year!" -- but don't stop to think about what a ridiculous amount of money he had to spend to make that $10 million.) Anyone gullible enough to make an investment like that wouldn't stay wealthy long. But I agree with Wade. If it's not a worthwhile investment for a savvy businessman, why should we think it's any more fiscally responsible for the government? The fact is it's not. I applaud the state of Minnesota for having the moral courage not to pay for a new stadium, even if their actions do drip with hypocrisy after the Twins and Gophers stadiums.
UserPostedImage
Formo
  • Formo
  • 61.75% (Friendly)
  • Veteran Member
15 years ago

The margin on an NFL franchise is amazingly low. (Fiscally naive people see the raw numbers -- "Jerry Jones made $10 million last year!" -- but don't stop to think about what a ridiculous amount of money he had to spend to make that $10 million.) Anyone gullible enough to make an investment like that wouldn't stay wealthy long. But I agree with Wade. If it's not a worthwhile investment for a savvy businessman, why should we think it's any more fiscally responsible for the government? The fact is it's not. I applaud the state of Minnesota for having the moral courage not to pay for a new stadium, even if their actions do drip with hypocrisy after the Twins and Gophers stadiums.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



The bolded is where we highly disagree. I can see that if the Twins didn't get a stadium. But to not put down some sort of time to make a plan with the Vikings (the biggest pro sport draw, BTW) for a stadium deal?

Bullshit. I don't care how bad the effin' economy is. Bull-effing-shit.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
Two wrongs don't make a right, Formo. I don't think the government should be subsidizing any stadiums. Just because Jeffrey got buy with stealing a cookie doesn't mean Johnny should.
UserPostedImage
Formo
  • Formo
  • 61.75% (Friendly)
  • Veteran Member
15 years ago

Two wrongs don't make a right, Formo. I don't think the government should be subsidizing any stadiums. Just because Jeffrey got buy with stealing a cookie doesn't mean Johnny should.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



That's the thing.. I don't think it's wrong. I'm not saying there isn't better plans. But still.

If I pay extra taxes for some 'save the swamps' here in MN and for that nice, shiny Library in downtown MPLS, both of which I could care less about, and neither I plan on ever visiting.. Why can't there be some sort of deal done for a stadium?

EDIT: My issue isn't that there's not a plan. It's that the state refuses (and has for years) to sit down with some serious nosegrinding with the Vikings to hash something out.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
I don't think we should be forced to pay taxes to save swamps either. 😉
UserPostedImage
Formo
  • Formo
  • 61.75% (Friendly)
  • Veteran Member
15 years ago

I don't think we should be forced to pay taxes to save swamps either. ;)

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Yet somehow, us Minnesotans will be paying over $200 million in the first year of said tax..
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Wade
  • Wade
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Veteran Member
15 years ago
Formo,
1. I take it as a given the the government [strike]spends[/strike] wastes 100s of millions of dollars. "Tossing money into the swamp" strikes me as a perfect metaphor, and that the MN govmt actually is making the metaphor into literal truth...well, that's obscene in only the way the government can be obscene.

2. Trust me, if there was a real gain to be had, the investment bankers would be all over the place. Those people just don't leave hundreds of millions of dollars worth of opportunities go.

3. I have a hard time imagining a library being in the same 'ballpark'. But even if there were such a library project out there, I would oppose it for the same reason. Because I'd defy anyone to show me that a library is the best investment of half a billion.

4. Frankly, MN could spend a good chunk of that many on their highways.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
packersfan99
15 years ago
All of you are right, this money could be used for other investment. But I guess the Vikings owner is right too, this is a team that is ranked last in value out of all NFL teams by Forbes Magazine. So if the numbers are not there, he needs to see other options.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Cheesey
  • Cheesey
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Preferred Member
15 years ago

The margin on an NFL franchise is amazingly low. (Fiscally naive people see the raw numbers -- "Jerry Jones made $10 million last year!" -- but don't stop to think about what a ridiculous amount of money he had to spend to make that $10 million.) Anyone gullible enough to make an investment like that wouldn't stay wealthy long. But I agree with Wade. If it's not a worthwhile investment for a savvy businessman, why should we think it's any more fiscally responsible for the government? The fact is it's not. I applaud the state of Minnesota for having the moral courage not to pay for a new stadium, even if their actions do drip with hypocrisy after the Twins and Gophers stadiums.

"Formo" wrote:



The bolded is where we highly disagree. I can see that if the Twins didn't get a stadium. But to not put down some sort of time to make a plan with the Vikings (the biggest pro sport draw, BTW) for a stadium deal?

Bullshit. I don't care how bad the effin' economy is. Bull-effing-shit.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:


I see what you are saying Formo.
I have a question though. The Twins play 81 games a season at home. The Vikings what, 10? So i would guess that the state gets alot more money off the Twins then the Vikings. And now that the Gophers have their own stadium, that leaves less income for a new Vikings stadium, right?
I'm not being a wise guy, i'm asking if that might have something to do with it.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Vikings will be leaving MN to depress another state.
UserPostedImage
Formo
  • Formo
  • 61.75% (Friendly)
  • Veteran Member
15 years ago

Formo,
1. I take it as a given the the government [strike]spends[/strike] wastes 100s of millions of dollars. "Tossing money into the swamp" strikes me as a perfect metaphor, and that the MN govmt actually is making the metaphor into literal truth...well, that's obscene in only the way the government can be obscene.

2. Trust me, if there was a real gain to be had, the investment bankers would be all over the place. Those people just don't leave hundreds of millions of dollars worth of opportunities go.

3. I have a hard time imagining a library being in the same 'ballpark'. But even if there were such a library project out there, I would oppose it for the same reason. Because I'd defy anyone to show me that a library is the best investment of half a billion.

4. Frankly, MN could spend a good chunk of that many on their highways.

"Wade" wrote:



1. I try not to take it as a given that the government wastes that much money. It angers me. lol

2. How is there NOT a real gain to be had? And with the investment bankers being under fire as much as they have been, there's no way they'd take this opportunity.

3. Well, the library wasn't as much as a new stadium.. but I still paid for it, even though I had no choice and I never will use the thing. That's the heavy argument opposing forces of the stadium use. I can play that game.

4. Oh, they do. They just like to take their sweet time with it. lol
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Formo
  • Formo
  • 61.75% (Friendly)
  • Veteran Member
15 years ago

The margin on an NFL franchise is amazingly low. (Fiscally naive people see the raw numbers -- "Jerry Jones made $10 million last year!" -- but don't stop to think about what a ridiculous amount of money he had to spend to make that $10 million.) Anyone gullible enough to make an investment like that wouldn't stay wealthy long. But I agree with Wade. If it's not a worthwhile investment for a savvy businessman, why should we think it's any more fiscally responsible for the government? The fact is it's not. I applaud the state of Minnesota for having the moral courage not to pay for a new stadium, even if their actions do drip with hypocrisy after the Twins and Gophers stadiums.

"Cheesey" wrote:



The bolded is where we highly disagree. I can see that if the Twins didn't get a stadium. But to not put down some sort of time to make a plan with the Vikings (the biggest pro sport draw, BTW) for a stadium deal?

Bullshit. I don't care how bad the effin' economy is. Bull-effing-shit.

"Formo" wrote:


I see what you are saying Formo.
I have a question though. The Twins play 81 games a season at home. The Vikings what, 10? So i would guess that the state gets alot more money off the Twins then the Vikings. And now that the Gophers have their own stadium, that leaves less income for a new Vikings stadium, right?
I'm not being a wise guy, i'm asking if that might have something to do with it.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Well, until the new stadium opens up next season, Twins tickets are really cheap. For the cheap seats, they are as low as $4-$7 a seat. Much different price range, not to mention the taxes the players pay in.. Twins payroll < Vikings payroll.

I'm sure there's a million good reasons why the state doesn't look at the Vikings issue. As a fan, I don't take no for an answer, though. 🙂
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Fan Shout
beast (2h) : Packershome going to the Whiteout unis again
Zero2Cool (8h) : Oh wait, they got Cam Ward. 1st overall right? haha oops
Zero2Cool (8h) : They could send Packers a 1st for a QB they are familiar with
Zero2Cool (8h) : Titans QB Will Levis to have season-ending shoulder surgery
Zero2Cool (19-Jul) : Their season did kind of start there, so 🤷
dfosterf (19-Jul) : Eagles put an engraved Brazil flag on their super bowl rings
Zero2Cool (18-Jul) : Benton unsigned no more
Zero2Cool (17-Jul) : That's good analysis, yes you are getting old. It'd a blessing!
dfosterf (14-Jul) : *analysis* gettin' old
dfosterf (14-Jul) : One of the best analyisis I"ve ever watched at this time of an offseason
dfosterf (14-Jul) : Andy Herman interviewed Warren Sharp on his Pack a day podcast
packerfanoutwest (10-Jul) : Us Padres fans love it....But it'll be a Dodgers/Yankees World Series
Zero2Cool (9-Jul) : Brewers sweep Dodgers. Awesome
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : And James Flanigan is the grandson of Packers Super Bowl winner Jim Flanigan Sr.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : Jerome Bettis and Jim Flanigans sons as well!
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Thomas Davis Jr is OLB, not WR. Oops.
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Larry Fitzgeral and Thomas Davis sons too. WR's as well.
Mucky Tundra (5-Jul) : Kaydon Finley, son of Jermichael Finley, commits to Notre Dame
dfosterf (3-Jul) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!
Zero2Cool (3-Jul) : My cousin, yes.
dfosterf (3-Jul) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?
Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

14-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

10-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10-Jul / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

6-Jul / Random Babble / Martha Careful

4-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

2-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.