Once I read Thompson's quote I stopped conjecturing. Trying to interpret one of his neither-yes-nor-no answers is a waste of time. All it means is he doesn't want to share anything.

---

I would be very dissapointed with the Packers coaching staff if we didn't look at Vick and every other talented free agent out there. Not that i'm saying Vick is a good fit here but at least Ted and company are leaving no stone unturned trying to upgrade the Packers.

---

I have a feeling Thompson is an awesome poker player. I know I'd be scared to sit at the same table with him.

---

I am not going to go over every post here to find the answer..

so my question is.....

Was the talk more like this

Ted to staff:

Vick is available, what do you all think

Staff: HELL NO

I think all we have is the usual Packers front office obfuscation. In other words, we have no idea what the true tenor of the conversation is. Some unnamed sources claim that the Packers staff has a hardon for Vick, so who knows.

---

Well the report from 55sandman states that it is serious..

Sandman does have the history that they do post insider information

(Greene, and another coach signing before anyone was talking about it)

so sandman, right now conflicting reports from other reporters stating it is just a question asked in passing and your report saying its serious

We have 5 or 6 pages of this right now, care to offer any more insight?

[youtube]CMNry4PE93Y[/youtube]

---

yeah, because you drooling asstards first put my qualifier of "athlete" under scrutiny. what now? ok.

he's an incredible option for a back-up to Rodgers. he may not be the greatest passer in the league, but he won't buckle under pressure like our sad-sack rookies and he can scramble like an RB.

now go get a mop for all that drool. "LOL!"

---

Yeah no thanks. Zero tells and that cold stare. Ugh.

---

It's a good thing I have a dictionary by every computer I use.

---