Rockmolder
15 years ago

First year starter. That is all that needs to be said.

"dhazer" wrote:



Whats that have to do with anything? He was on the team for 3 damn years i'm so tired of that. Yet Flacco and Ryan come in and bring their teams to the playoffs with brand new head coaches.

Rodgers is a good qb and does have areas to improve. I posted the 2 articles to try and show that we have weaknesses and trying to get people to take off the goggles and see this.

"cheeseheads123" wrote:



How do you always conveniently lose track of any other stat when it gives you a chance to bash on someone you don't like. (Yes, I saw the Favre post, you're claiming not to be a Rodgers basher, but yet, you twist everything in a way that it'll look bad.)

Flacco had very mediocre stats. He gets into the play-offs with Ray Rice, Willis McGahee, a big bruising O-line and (one of) the best defenses in the league, yet, we can chalk that one up to him. Maybe we can even throw in some 4th quarter comebacks. The Cowboys would be perfect. Two 60+ yard runs from his backs. I love me some Flacco.

Then Ryan. Given, he had a decent rookie season, but his numbers don't rival Rodgers'. Not by far. Given, he's a rookie and Rodgers has been in the league for a while. That does indeed make a difference to me. However, the Falcons where 2nd in rushing yards, with the passing offense dragging them down to a decent 10th in overall yards. Their defense got all walked over, but a statistical abnormality got them in. Or some very good red-zone defense. You can choose yourself. 24th in yards, 11th in points given up.

I think that it's pretty safe to say that these teams didn't get in because of their QBs. Their defense and running game helped them out immensly.

Now to the Packers. 5th in points, 8th in passing yards and 17th in rushing yards. It's obvious how we're moving this offense. Looks like a play-off caliber team. This by itsself doesn't look like a SB winner, but it's very solid. Build a good defense around it or improve the running game and we can get to the big dance with Rodgers at helmet. Still, we didn't get into the play-offs. 26th in rushing yards given up, 22nd in points given up, 12th in passing yards given up and that makes for the 20th ranked defense.

Rodgers didn't play that well in the last part of the game. I give you that. I did some research a while back and he went something like 10/20, 1 TD, 2 Ints. Not too pretty. Does that mean that he's a stat guy? Or doesn't have any leadership ability? C'mon, what a bunch or bullcrap. Once again, he was a first year starter and his defense and running game failed him continuesly. Does he need some improvement? Obviously. Is he worse than Ryan, because Ryan was a 'rookie miracle'? I seriously doubt it. Had the defense not given up 4 games, we'd been 10-6 and everyone would've been happy. Even with those other 3 close games that he gave up. I'm blaming defense mostly, and Rodgers a little.
dhazer
  • dhazer
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago
Wonders if Zero or 93Z would have posted the article people would actually read it and see it wasn't me speaking in the original post but a writer from JSO.

I am not going to keep going over the same old boring debate about Ryan and Flacco plain and simple they were the starting qb for a team that sucked the year before and led them to the playoffs.


READ THE DAMN ARTICLE I'm not the one cutting down on Rodgers but his own damn coach.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
reed
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

Wonders if Zero or 93Z would have posted the article people would actually read it and see it wasn't me speaking in the original post but a writer from JSO.

I am not going to keep going over the same old boring debate about Ryan and Flacco plain and simple they were the starting qb for a team that sucked the year before and led them to the playoffs.


READ THE DAMN ARTICLE I'm not the one cutting down on Rodgers but his own damn coach.

"dhazer" wrote:



I read the article, again, before it was posted here. Regardless of who posted the article, I stand by my comments about Rodgers. I think he has plenty of room to improve. I don't really see the coach as cutting Rodgers down with his comments. I do say that I think that is up to our own perception. I took his comments more so as just the truth with no bullshitting. Facts are facts. Aaron needs to improve and we're lucky that he's young and at the level he's at.
UserPostedImage
dhazer
  • dhazer
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago

Wonders if Zero or 93Z would have posted the article people would actually read it and see it wasn't me speaking in the original post but a writer from JSO.

I am not going to keep going over the same old boring debate about Ryan and Flacco plain and simple they were the starting qb for a team that sucked the year before and led them to the playoffs.


READ THE DAMN ARTICLE I'm not the one cutting down on Rodgers but his own damn coach.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I read the article, again, before it was posted here. Regardless of who posted the article, I stand by my comments about Rodgers. I think he has plenty of room to improve. I don't really see the coach as cutting Rodgers down with his comments. I do say that I think that is up to our own perception. I took his comments more so as just the truth with no bullshitting. Facts are facts. Aaron needs to improve and we're lucky that he's young and at the level he's at.

"dhazer" wrote:



I agree with that Zero but because i ride Rodgers everyone thinks it as me hating him. He just has alot to prove to me for all the hero worshipping he gets.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
reed
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Who's worshiping Rodgers as a hero? I think most fans are just RELIEVED he's not a Rex Grossman or Tavaris Jackson or Rick Mirer or ... you get the point. I believe most fans were scared shittless of our QB position when Brett retired. To see Rodgers come in under a helluva load of pressure and play at a decent level, shit, I think the Packer world took a huge sigh of relief. I think that sigh of relief is being misguided in your views as worship. I think you're wrong there.

We were all spoiled as Packers fans for 16 years. Packer fans are smart and are aware of the difficulties of finding a worthy franchise QB. Most fans feel more secure in the notion we may have found our QB of the next ten years and like myself and VERY grateful for it.

Your position of trouble comes in that he was drafted by Ted, not Sherman or Wolf therefore his ill timed/worded comment to the fans after being barraged with Brett questions ... 'They need to get on board now or keep their mouths shut' put loads of sand in your vagina.
UserPostedImage
Blank402
15 years ago


Yes i know our defense failed at the end of games but yet we were tied for 3rd with 22 ints and had 6 fumbles with 7 returned for tds which lead the league. So apparently the defense did do some good and helped us win some games also which is pretty much forgotten about. I was a total team failure last year plain and simple.

The special teams had 2 td returns and 6th best in punt return yards.

Mason Crosby was #5 in scoring amongst kickers last year.


So with that you can still say Crosby lost us 2 games but then Rodgers lost us 4 games with his ints in the final 4 minutes of a game.

"dhazer" wrote:



And how many of those INT, fumble or punt returns came in the last five minutes of the game? How many game winning kicks did Crosby make? Sure, they kept us in the game, but so did Rodgers and his 28 TDs. The article you posted mentions Rodgers being a stats guy because he couldn't get it done at the end of the games. That's fine, but our defense and special teams was exactly the same way. Our entire team was unclutch last year and it's unfair to place the blame solely on Rodgers.
blank
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago

I believe most fans were scared shittless of our QB position when Brett retired.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I wasn't.

And as for dhazer, to say that Flacco and Ryan "lead" these teams to the playoffs is risible on its face. And that's putting it very politely.
UserPostedImage
jbshell04
15 years ago
The prob I saw haze was not the article but the negative part of the article you chose to quote. You didn't preface your quotinh of said article. Therefore on its face you appeared to be going out of you way to be negative towards rodgers.
He needs improvement as do we all in life. We have seen him perform with the pressure on him replacing farve let's see how he does in 2 AF (after farve) . My biggest concern is the backup posistion could Flynn or Brohm get us 2 n 2 if rodgers went down for 4 weeks that I don't think so.
I am therefor I think.
TheEngineer
15 years ago
Yes. That comment on Brohm hiding in his shell worries me the most in that entire article. It does a leader no good to be invisible when the going gets tough.
blank
Cheesey
15 years ago
Yeah.....Rodgers is a "stat guy". 28 TD's to 13 INT's, and no playoffs as compared to 22 TD's and 22 INT's and no playoffs. But HE"s not a "stat guy", he's the GREATEST!!!
Again....i LOVE the "balance".
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (5m) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (7h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (7h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (8h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (8h) : now 3
Zero2Cool (9h) : Who? What?
beast (17h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (22h) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
8m / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.