I've gotta go with a hell no on this one! A good blogger wouldn't start everthing he writes with an emotional attachment to hating the general manager of the team. But it is a free country, so if you must.

You rock Haze, and that snipe hunt invitation is always open. :thumbleft:

---

One through five, you can certainly make the case that the Pack WR corp is the best in the conference. Yes, Arizona is probably better 1 - 3, but top to bottom, they do not stack up to us.

---

1-5 i would say the Saints have a better wr corp seeing they use all 5 of their wrs. Thats why i brought them up everyone knows of Colston but what about Lance Moore, Devery Henderson?


But like i said i just thought a so called writer would have facts straight before he posts them.

---

A few things....



Aaron didn't hold himself back. MM did. MM's playcalling was highly questionable last year. MM needs to be as aggressive as he was in '07 or I'd be calling for him to be on a short leash.



Huh? Nick and Atari know what they're doing. Smith is merely backup in case one of them gets hurt.



Favre or no Favre, MN is still the team to beat in the division. I'm actually hoping MN has Favre and they get good Brett, not bad Brett. If we can beat them with good Brett, we're for real.

OK, this is changing the subject a little but this is what I don't get in life - there are those who instead of bumping themselves up, they'd rather their opponents got weaker. That thinking is stupid. I like tough opponents because when you beat them, that means you are for real.



I'm sure Capers will account for that. He's shown he's flexible enough to make things work if he has to.

Overall - our W/L record all goes to one thing - how our D holds up. If it's closer to '07, expect a strong season. If it's closer to '08, it will be a long season. I'm actually confident we'll be good, Capers will work some magic, and the 3-4 will work.

---

One thing that I saw that I KNEW he was wrong, and definitely was wearing his green and gold tented glasses, was when he said that Packers had the No.1 RB.

Adrian Peterson anyone?

Anyway, I pretty much agree with everything else he said.

---

The guy writes for a few websites and allegedly writes from the packer fan point of view. He attempts some fairness and proclaims his biases.

He is not so much of a homer as some of the Cowboys people or those "this year is the Superbowl" every year vikling people.

Posters here can't agree on too much so you either like or dislike the guy or take turns doing so.

He is like any other poster here to me. I agree sometimes and disagree sometimes.

---