16 years ago
Like when time matters more than yardage? How about instead of a "prevent D" deep quarters type crap, go to the 2-4-5 and give them multiple looks.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
16 years ago

The first time Raji busts threw a double team and sacks the QB in a 2-4-5 D, I'm going to shatter my vocal chords screaming "Victory!" Johnny Drama style.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



+1 It's a good show.

Put me down for one of those rub-n-tugs.
UserPostedImage
warhawk
16 years ago

They are talking about this scheme coming out of the nickel or dime which means it's in a passing situation. This is obviously not how they will line up on first down, or, in a second down situation where they may run the ball, like 2nd and five.

What they are talking about here with two down lineman is that is one scheme in which they plan to use the quickness of LB's and DB's in order to get pressure on the QB in passing situations.

This is not what they will be using on first down or run downs.

"DakotaT" wrote:



The counter to it is a double tight end set, and picking up a big gainer on a deep draw.

In a close game, I don't like. If you want to pin your ears back because you have the luxury of a lead, then it would be an interesting formation.

"warhawk" wrote:



If it's a nickle or dime situation and an obvious passing down and the offense lines up with two TE's I believe the Packers will be ready with a counter for that lineup. They don't stay in a two man front. They just start out that way and then adjust to the formation they see.

This formation is only to disguise what will ultimately be an aggressive rushing defense once the play starts. If we put three hands down that limits what they bring from behind the line more and gives the OL less to have to worry about than when they bring two and then two or three from different angles.

You won't see Capers line up two DL and ultimately only rush those two. This is not a Prevent scheme.
"The train is leaving the station."
Dulak
16 years ago

They are talking about this scheme coming out of the nickel or dime which means it's in a passing situation. This is obviously not how they will line up on first down, or, in a second down situation where they may run the ball, like 2nd and five.

What they are talking about here with two down lineman is that is one scheme in which they plan to use the quickness of LB's and DB's in order to get pressure on the QB in passing situations.

This is not what they will be using on first down or run downs.

"warhawk" wrote:



The counter to it is a double tight end set, and picking up a big gainer on a deep draw.

In a close game, I don't like. If you want to pin your ears back because you have the luxury of a lead, then it would be an interesting formation.

"DakotaT" wrote:



If it's a nickle or dime situation and an obvious passing down and the offense lines up with two TE's I believe the Packers will be ready with a counter for that lineup. They don't stay in a two man front. They just start out that way and then adjust to the formation they see.

This formation is only to disguise what will ultimately be an aggressive rushing defense once the play starts. If we put three hands down that limits what they bring from behind the line more and gives the OL less to have to worry about than when they bring two and then two or three from different angles.

You won't see Capers line up two DL and ultimately only rush those two. This is not a Prevent scheme.

"warhawk" wrote:



ahhh so could be at least 2 others and it's up to the O to guess whom those will be
earthquake
16 years ago

They are talking about this scheme coming out of the nickel or dime which means it's in a passing situation. This is obviously not how they will line up on first down, or, in a second down situation where they may run the ball, like 2nd and five.

What they are talking about here with two down lineman is that is one scheme in which they plan to use the quickness of LB's and DB's in order to get pressure on the QB in passing situations.

This is not what they will be using on first down or run downs.

"Dulak" wrote:



The counter to it is a double tight end set, and picking up a big gainer on a deep draw.

In a close game, I don't like. If you want to pin your ears back because you have the luxury of a lead, then it would be an interesting formation.

"warhawk" wrote:



If it's a nickle or dime situation and an obvious passing down and the offense lines up with two TE's I believe the Packers will be ready with a counter for that lineup. They don't stay in a two man front. They just start out that way and then adjust to the formation they see.

This formation is only to disguise what will ultimately be an aggressive rushing defense once the play starts. If we put three hands down that limits what they bring from behind the line more and gives the OL less to have to worry about than when they bring two and then two or three from different angles.

You won't see Capers line up two DL and ultimately only rush those two. This is not a Prevent scheme.

"DakotaT" wrote:



ahhh so could be at least 2 others and it's up to the O to guess whom those will be

"warhawk" wrote:



This is pretty much the basis of the 3-4, you never know which 4 are going to rush. You could line up 2, and actually bring 5, who will the extra 3 be? Lots of variation you can have here.
blank
blueleopard
16 years ago
I also hope our players get stronger and more aggressive. It's time to start throwing Minnesota's offensive line around and actually nail Adrian Peterson.
Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings
Bigbyfan
16 years ago
You see the Steelers use this defense a lot. I have always liked it because it seems like "controlled chaos."
blank
Rockmolder
16 years ago
Ravens Defense 

Just look at 28 seconds. That's what you can do with a package without a lot of D-linemen. They're playing a 1-5-5 from what I can see. The LBs are all walking around at the line of scrimmage, Romo has no idea who's coming and who isn't. Same goes for the center. The NT picks up the RG and C and at least one LB has a nearly free line to the QB.

Of course, that's not what our defense would look like instantly, but how awesome would it be to see them do that down the line. Maybe even later on in year one in a nickel package. My wet dream.
Fan Shout
TheKanataThrilla (43m) : Unfortunately he doesn't seem ready to be an emergency QB.
TheKanataThrilla (44m) : As a Canadian and a follower of Canadian University football. I am rooting for him
dfosterf (45m) : I bet a lot of us will follow the Taylor Elgersma journey with interest. Personally, got a Kurt Warner vibe goin' on. I like him
TheKanataThrilla (45m) : Not sure if either will be claimed though.
TheKanataThrilla (46m) : Tune or Hooker would make sense
dfosterf (59m) : Clayton Tune cut by the Cards? Don't know if that's the guy, we shall see
TheKanataThrilla (1h) : Per Bill Huber, the Packers will not be bringing back Taylor Elgersma or Sean Clifford on the practice squad, so a new third quarterback
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Schefter must have deleted his tweet
dfosterf (3h) : Hopefully Jerry reaches under the seat cushions and ashtrays of his jet and scrapes up the 45 million apr and spares us further nonsense
dfosterf (3h) : Have to admit the PO'd Cowboy fan videos would be fun to watch. Problem with draft picks is half their fanbase barely knows what that is
beast (3h) : I think Cowboys fans are ready to get their pitch forks and burning sticks if Jerry were to trade Micah
dfosterf (3h) : If Jerry traded Micah to GB, here in northern Va. they would have to quick build yet another data center to handle the internet hate traffic
Zero2Cool (4h) : its signing and trades that you don't hear about, other then announced
Zero2Cool (4h) : If you hear rumors about Packers sign or trade, won't happen. Not how they work
dfosterf (4h) : 19 players in a contract year. Jones called loss to us worst loss in Cowboy history. Forget Parsons trade. Not happenin' Cap'n
packerfanoutwest (5h) : The Packers, meanwhile, are the youngest team in the league for the third consecutive year.
dfosterf (7h) : That it was darkest before the dawn in Bengals and Commanders before they got deals done
Zero2Cool (8h) : what is Schefter saying?
dfosterf (8h) : He was getting Dorito infusion therapy
dfosterf (8h) : He's outta shape. Why, just the other day I saw him splayed out on the trainers table
Mucky Tundra (14h) : Parsons has followed Rasheed Walker on Twitter. Quite the choice
Mucky Tundra (14h) : Kuhn is a former player who works for the team, if somethings going down, he would be close to it
Mucky Tundra (14h) : @kuhnj30 Micah Freaking Parsons
Mucky Tundra (14h) : A LOT of buzz on the Bird App regarding Parsons; even Schefter is saying it's serious
dfosterf (20h) : *Orzech*
dfosterf (20h) : Orzich long snapper 3 yr extension
Zero2Cool (21h) : Packers signed someone for three year deal
Zero2Cool (21h) : lol i know it's insane ... sign up for the waiver wire then you'll know
wpr (21h) : YES!!!!!!
Mucky Tundra (21h) : WE WANT THE LIST! WE WANT THE LIST!
Zero2Cool (21h) : @JJLahey · 2m Holy crap, Packers, where the heck is the list?
Zero2Cool (21h) : haha folks on Tweeter every year this time ... 'where is list Packers!!" hahaha
wpr (22h) : He played pretty good.
Zero2Cool (22h) : NAZIR STACKHOUSE HAS MADE THE 53
Zero2Cool (23h) : NOOOOO KALEN IS GONE
Zero2Cool (23h) : Kalen King and Kamal Hadden making it. me thinks
schroeder84 (26-Aug) : @dfosterf I suspect Elgersma WILL be hard to hide. Raw, but talented
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : pp.com is broken, halt testing, gotta go do work things for a bit
hardrocker950 (26-Aug) : Mecole Hardman was released, to the surprise of few
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : PP.com updated. Reset Password works, and now User Profile pages are a thing
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : Soft hope plan is having fantasy football weekly on-site that i build. cannot do that with this setup.
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : It's older technology, resource hog, cannot be upgraded/changed. That's to start.
packerfanoutwest (25-Aug) : Ok, but what is wrong with this site?
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : check out packerpeople.com
Mucky Tundra (25-Aug) : Oh crap I missed that! I thought it was a 2026 pick
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : It wasn't even next year pick, it's two years away. old dog food value
Mucky Tundra (25-Aug) : Yep! Everytime a team trades with Howie that team is the loser (so says the media)
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : We are hosed.
Mucky Tundra (25-Aug) : Per Schefter, GB is sending a 6th rounder for OT Darian Kennard
Zero2Cool (24-Aug) : Finally got new site to keep folks logged in. New tech is pain sometimes
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
43m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

26-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

25-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

24-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

24-Aug / Around The NFL / beast

23-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

22-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.