Zero2Cool
a year ago

I want you to be right about the power of the pressure on the qb. I want this scheme change and the personnel decisions to work. I want them to "get home" on that qb. The cardiac pack comes in when they are trying, even getting there when some wr streaked through, or didn't get there and the qb hits his receiver, or misses and we got lucky, etc. etc. etc.

My off season would be better if we had just one more CB I felt really good about.

One more is not greedy, imo

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 


I would be good with them adding another CB, no question. I just wouldn't do it at the expense of the front seven.

I do think this scheme is going to give up big plays from time to time. I also think it's going to net a lot of big plays for defense too. I would rather die through aggressive attacking than watching teams nickel and dime their way down the field eating up clock. I'm not saying this is the best way to win a championship. It's just what I would enjoy more because it feels more like going down swinging rather than just being passive.
UserPostedImage
+1
greengold
a year ago

I would be good with them adding another CB, no question. I just wouldn't do it at the expense of the front seven.

I do think this scheme is going to give up big plays from time to time. I also think it's going to net a lot of big plays for defense too. I would rather die through aggressive attacking than watching teams nickel and dime their way down the field eating up clock. I'm not saying this is the best way to win a championship. It's just what I would enjoy more because it feels more like going down swinging rather than just being passive.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



This approach seems to be the smart play. Trend is rules changes are always going to favor the offense and promote the offensive big play or big penalty to favor the offense. Get athletic guys in there who can maybe disrupt sidetrack the opposing offense seems like a good strategy .
+1
dfosterf
a year ago

I would be good with them adding another CB, no question. I just wouldn't do it at the expense of the front seven.

I do think this scheme is going to give up big plays from time to time. I also think it's going to net a lot of big plays for defense too. I would rather die through aggressive attacking than watching teams nickel and dime their way down the field eating up clock. I'm not saying this is the best way to win a championship. It's just what I would enjoy more because it feels more like going down swinging rather than just being passive.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Me too.
If I never see the so-called "prevent" defense again, I am happier than I have been in a long time, as one example. I'm probably even more extreme in that I'm bringing the heat on the hail mary. That might put me in the category of one crazy person in the stands or watching on tv, whatever.
+1
dhazer
a year ago

Me too.
If I never see the so-called "prevent" defense again, I am happier than I have been in a long time, as one example. I'm probably even more extreme in that I'm bringing the heat on the hail mary. That might put me in the category of one crazy person in the stands or watching on tv, whatever.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 



If you think about it that is smarter to do because you are not giving the receivers time to get downfield more teams need to do that.

I hate to say it's going to be a better defense than we had last year. Top 10 scoring defense and top 10 passing defense, it was just the play calling at the end of games when he would change his strategy.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
a year ago

If you think about it that is smarter to do because you are not giving the receivers time to get downfield more teams need to do that.

I hate to say it's going to be a better defense than we had last year. Top 10 scoring defense and top 10 passing defense, it was just the play calling at the end of games when he would change his strategy.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 


25th in Defensive Team Passer Rating though. Means teams were passing with efficiency.

I agree though. Top Ten defense in scoring should win you double digit games.
UserPostedImage
beast
a year ago
All the loses we're on the defense though, the offense in the first half had some struggles including injuries, injuries and more injuries including to the starting OL. Defensive was keeping them in games.
UserPostedImage
greengold
a year ago
Sounds like he will be playing for his next contract this year which sounds good to me. I hope he plays well enough to get more than the $12.5 million 5th year that the Packers declined. Whether that is here or elsewhere next year.
+1
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    packerfanoutwest (4h) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off
    Mucky Tundra (9h) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
    Zero2Cool (9h) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
    Mucky Tundra (9h) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
    Mucky Tundra (10h) : Who's Theo?
    Zero2Cool (10h) : How is Theo alliteration?
    Mucky Tundra (10h) : Bad week for people whose names are alliterations
    Zero2Cool (12h) : Hulk Hogan gone too.
    Zero2Cool (13h) : Oh, it's toe injury
    Zero2Cool (14h) : Hope it's not serious. that would stink
    dfosterf (14h) : Sounds like an ankle not a knee for Fields
    dfosterf (14h) : Ya Flaccp on Browns
    Zero2Cool (14h) : Maybe Tyrod Taylor instead
    Zero2Cool (14h) : He's on Browns, right?
    dfosterf (14h) : They would probably go with Flacco is my guess if Fields out
    dfosterf (14h) : Fleece 'em again!
    Zero2Cool (14h) : Malik Willis might be someone Jets come after
    packerfanoutwest (14h) : Packers introduce 1923-inspired classic uniform, leather-look helmet
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Both LB Quay Walker and Rookie DB Micah Robinson have passed their physicals
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Happy to see site feels more snappy snappy
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : No sir. I did not.
    dfosterf (23-Jul) : You didn't get free childcare when you were at work?
    wpr (23-Jul) : These guys make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Pay for their own childcare.
    dfosterf (23-Jul) : 2nd issue. Number 1 issue was no gameday childcare. 1 of 3 teams not providing it
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Suppose if locker room is main issue, we sitting pretty
    wpr (23-Jul) : I thought so Mucky. In those useless player polls GB always rates high overall. Locker is a part of it.
    Mucky Tundra (23-Jul) : Wasn't the locker room just updated like 6 or 7 years ago?
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I have forum updated on different site. We'll see how this one goes before going to that
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Elgton Jenkins has a back injury, is expect to end contract dispute
    wpr (23-Jul) : It's funny the PA complained about the locker room. It wasn't that long ago it was top shelf. Things change in a hurry.
    wpr (23-Jul) : The site is much more better.
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : NFLPA report said Packers lockerroom needed upgrade. Whining bout where you change?
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I saw that and thought it was kind of lame.
    dfosterf (23-Jul) : Packers new locker room is pretty awesome. Great for morale, imo
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Shuffled things on the web server. Hope it makes it faster.
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Other times, it's turtle ass
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Sometimes it's snappy, like now.
    beast (23-Jul) : I feel like it's loading at the top of the next minute, or something like that.
    beast (23-Jul) : Also the thanks/heart takes FOREVER to load, and posting in the shout box takes three times FOREVER!
    beast (23-Jul) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
    beast (23-Jul) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Yeah, I noticed that too. Is it slow for PackerPeople.com too?
    wpr (23-Jul) : I don't know what you IT guys call it but the page loading is very slow for me today.
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : SSL might be settled now.
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Still working through SSL cert issues
    wpr (23-Jul) : Glad to be back
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I think PH original finally working.
    dfosterf (22-Jul) : Can tell you are having a fun day Kev
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Yep, I had to manually move them. It'll fix itself after more posts.
    Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Same deal with the songs/videos thread, says you replied last but when I go there it's what I posted earlier is last
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    2h / Around The NFL / wpr

    8h / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

    9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    22h / Around The NFL / beast

    23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.