Zero2Cool
11 months ago

I want you to be right about the power of the pressure on the qb. I want this scheme change and the personnel decisions to work. I want them to "get home" on that qb. The cardiac pack comes in when they are trying, even getting there when some wr streaked through, or didn't get there and the qb hits his receiver, or misses and we got lucky, etc. etc. etc.

My off season would be better if we had just one more CB I felt really good about.

One more is not greedy, imo

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 


I would be good with them adding another CB, no question. I just wouldn't do it at the expense of the front seven.

I do think this scheme is going to give up big plays from time to time. I also think it's going to net a lot of big plays for defense too. I would rather die through aggressive attacking than watching teams nickel and dime their way down the field eating up clock. I'm not saying this is the best way to win a championship. It's just what I would enjoy more because it feels more like going down swinging rather than just being passive.
UserPostedImage
greengold
11 months ago

I would be good with them adding another CB, no question. I just wouldn't do it at the expense of the front seven.

I do think this scheme is going to give up big plays from time to time. I also think it's going to net a lot of big plays for defense too. I would rather die through aggressive attacking than watching teams nickel and dime their way down the field eating up clock. I'm not saying this is the best way to win a championship. It's just what I would enjoy more because it feels more like going down swinging rather than just being passive.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



This approach seems to be the smart play. Trend is rules changes are always going to favor the offense and promote the offensive big play or big penalty to favor the offense. Get athletic guys in there who can maybe disrupt sidetrack the opposing offense seems like a good strategy .
dfosterf
11 months ago

I would be good with them adding another CB, no question. I just wouldn't do it at the expense of the front seven.

I do think this scheme is going to give up big plays from time to time. I also think it's going to net a lot of big plays for defense too. I would rather die through aggressive attacking than watching teams nickel and dime their way down the field eating up clock. I'm not saying this is the best way to win a championship. It's just what I would enjoy more because it feels more like going down swinging rather than just being passive.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Me too.
If I never see the so-called "prevent" defense again, I am happier than I have been in a long time, as one example. I'm probably even more extreme in that I'm bringing the heat on the hail mary. That might put me in the category of one crazy person in the stands or watching on tv, whatever.
dhazer
11 months ago

Me too.
If I never see the so-called "prevent" defense again, I am happier than I have been in a long time, as one example. I'm probably even more extreme in that I'm bringing the heat on the hail mary. That might put me in the category of one crazy person in the stands or watching on tv, whatever.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 



If you think about it that is smarter to do because you are not giving the receivers time to get downfield more teams need to do that.

I hate to say it's going to be a better defense than we had last year. Top 10 scoring defense and top 10 passing defense, it was just the play calling at the end of games when he would change his strategy.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
reed
Zero2Cool
11 months ago

If you think about it that is smarter to do because you are not giving the receivers time to get downfield more teams need to do that.

I hate to say it's going to be a better defense than we had last year. Top 10 scoring defense and top 10 passing defense, it was just the play calling at the end of games when he would change his strategy.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 


25th in Defensive Team Passer Rating though. Means teams were passing with efficiency.

I agree though. Top Ten defense in scoring should win you double digit games.
UserPostedImage
beast
11 months ago
All the loses we're on the defense though, the offense in the first half had some struggles including injuries, injuries and more injuries including to the starting OL. Defensive was keeping them in games.
UserPostedImage
greengold
11 months ago
Sounds like he will be playing for his next contract this year which sounds good to me. I hope he plays well enough to get more than the $12.5 million 5th year that the Packers declined. Whether that is here or elsewhere next year.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (3h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (11h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (11h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (12h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (12h) : now 3
Zero2Cool (13h) : Who? What?
beast (21h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

6h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.