Packers to hire Tom Clements as QB coach

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

2 years ago

"Green Bay Packers expected to hire veteran assistant and former offensive coordinator Tom Clements as their new quarterbacks coach, per league sources; Clements' addition is expected to be welcomed highly by quarterback Aaron Rodgers as he contemplates his future"

I'm guessing Aaron Rodgers was involved with this decision.

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

nerdmann
Premier Member

2 years ago

Suggests they actually do want him back. Gag me.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

beast
Select Member

2 years ago

Suggests they actually do want him back. Gag me.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Suggest? They've been straight up saying it loud and proud for over a year... are you just realizing it?

nerdmann
Premier Member

2 years ago

Suggest? They've been straight up saying it loud and proud for over a year... are you just realizing it?

Originally Posted by: beast

They always "say" the right things.

This dude is Aaron's buddy, not a QB whisperer. Hope they got somebody else working with Love, presuming Love is even in their plans anymore.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

beast
Select Member

2 years ago

They always "say" the right things.

This dude is Aaron's buddy, not a QB whisperer. Hope they got somebody else working with Love, presuming Love is even in their plans anymore.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

He was the QB coach when Rodgers developed here, so he might actually know how to develop a QB. And he was a pretty successful QB in the CFL.

Speaking of Rodgers, Tom Clements was once coach to WR Amari Rodgers' father, Tee Martin when he was a QB on the Steelers. Martin would go on to become a WR coach and coach Randall Cobb at Kentucky, and now Martin is a WR coach with the Ravens.

nerdmann
Premier Member

2 years ago

Originally Posted by: beast

Iirc Clements was the Aaron sycophant calling plays in 2015 when the offense fell off a cliff after week 6.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

bboystyle
Member

2 years ago

Soooo Rodgers want changes for the better but keeps bringing back people that didnt work out . No QB should be running a team. Get this cancer outta GB already. Ty Rodgers for your time but its best to part ways. Wonder how long until Matt gets fed up with his QB playing coach and now GM.

dyeah_gb
Member

2 years ago

He was the QB coach when Rodgers developed here, so he might actually know how to develop a QB. And he was a pretty successful QB in the CFL.

...

Originally Posted by: beast

I agree with this. A good QB coach does not translate to a good OC or head coach. The fact that Clements was part of Rodgers original development is a good thing IMO. This applies to Love too as long as Clements doesn't teach him to be a choke artist in the playoffs. This is sarcasm (I think).

The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - R. Feynman

beast
Select Member

2 years ago

Iirc Clements was the Aaron sycophant calling plays in 2015 when the offense fell off a cliff after week 6.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Originally Posted by: bboystyle

Rodgers has won more Super Bowls with Tom Clements than without... and he helped develop Rodgers, so he might of worked out a hell lot better than you think.

If he was a cancer, they wouldn't be trying to bring him back... that's not how people react to cancer ...

nerdmann
Premier Member

2 years ago

#10

You mean when the team lose Nelson to injury and literally had no speed and they had to resort to using James Jones as the long ball route guy... and once the Broncos showed you can simply sit on all the short routes because they can't get deep...

Surrrrre, that's Clements and Rodgers fault that Nelson was injured and the GM didn't get them anybody with speed...

Damn man, you fucking literally are going to blame every damn thing on Rodgers aren't you?

Did Rodgers sleep with your wife or something?

Rodgers has won more Super Bowls with Tom Clements than without... and he helped develop Rodgers, so he might of worked out a hell lot better than you think.

If he was a cancer, they wouldn't be trying to bring him back... that's not how people react to cancer ...

Originally Posted by: beast

Remember after the 2014 debacle McCarthy gave up play calling? Until about week 10? 😄

Clements was Aaron's sycophant. Drink everytime Aaron scrambles right and hurls it deep.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (3m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (4m) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (24m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (1h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (1h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (2h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (2h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (2h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (2h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (2h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (2h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (2h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (2h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (2h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (2h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (2h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (2h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (2h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (3h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (3h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (3h) : Packers will get in

beast (3h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (3h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (3h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (6h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (6h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (7h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (16h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (16h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (20h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other

beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)

Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS