beast
5 years ago

Daniels was like Lang, when healthy, they can still play at the elite level.... they're just not staying healthy as often as they've gotten older... and I still think this is more about creating cap room and opportunities for the young talented players with potential that Gute thinks will be able to step up if given the room to step into a larger role.

Originally Posted by: beast 



But another factor is that not only do you have Lowry, Adams and Keke potential ready to step up and help at the 3 tech (and Lancaster at NT to maybe free up Clark for the 3 tech spot as well),

But also OLBers Za’Darius Smith and Rashan Gary both have the size to line up at the 3 tech in pass rush situations as well.

That's a lot of freaking potential talent that might be able to step up if given the opportunity. As some have suggested, potential talent could tank, but with that much potential the law of averages suggest at least one of them should be able to step up.
UserPostedImage
go.pack.go.
5 years ago

But another factor is that not only do you have Lowry, Adams and Keke potential ready to step up and help at the 3 tech (and Lancaster at NT to maybe free up Clark for the 3 tech spot as well),

But also OLBers Za’Darius Smith and Rashan Gary both have the size to line up at the 3 tech in pass rush situations as well.

That's a lot of freaking potential talent that might be able to step up if given the opportunity. As some have suggested, potential talent could tank, but with that much potential the law of averages suggest at least one of them should be able to step up.

Originally Posted by: beast 



I don’t disagree with you. However, I’m more concerned with winning right now. Daniels was a constant, we knew what we would get with him. A good leader, somebody who wasn’t going to cause trouble in the locker room or off the field, and a damn good player on the field. All of those other names? We have no idea what they will do except for Clark and maybe Lowry.

By cutting Daniels, we freed up some cap space. For who? A RB that nobody else wanted and a DL who may or may not pan out? Sorry, I just don’t stand behind this move.


UserPostedImage
beast
5 years ago

I don’t disagree with you. However, I’m more concerned with winning right now. Daniels was a constant, we knew what we would get with him. A good leader, somebody who wasn’t going to cause trouble in the locker room or off the field, and a damn good player on the field. All of those other names? We have no idea what they will do except for Clark and maybe Lowry.

By cutting Daniels, we freed up some cap space. For who? A RB that nobody else wanted and a DL who may or may not pan out? Sorry, I just don’t stand behind this move.

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 

Just because you don't know what we'll get from those other names doesn't mean Gute doesn't know either... and it's his call.

They don't need the money for the RB and young DL whom are on cheap rookie contracts, so suggesting it's for them is a clear red herring.

You actually answered your own question before asking the question, it frees up money for resigning Clark and Lowry.




UserPostedImage
go.pack.go.
5 years ago

Just because you don't know what we'll get from those other names doesn't mean Gute doesn't know either... and it's his call.

They don't need the money for the RB and young DL whom are on cheap rookie contracts, so suggesting it's for them is a clear red herring.

You actually answered your own question before asking the question, it frees up money for resigning Clark and Lowry.



Originally Posted by: beast 



So what happens when Clark and/or Lowry get hurt? Then we’re down to players who haven’t played enough to know much of anything about them. We absolutely need to re-sign Clark. But I think we should’ve kept Daniels for at least another year. We were set up to have one of the best defensive lines in the league. Now, who knows? Maybe the young guys will step up, maybe they won’t.

I’m a Gutekunst fan, but I don’t agree with this move (or letting Cobb go).

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
5 years ago
Daniels wasn't used much last season. Clark has been getting better each year and like only 23. It's best to get rid of guys year too soon than too late.

And again, the Packers weren't really using him the same under Pettine.


UserPostedImage
buckeyepackfan
5 years ago
This will be a great move if Lowry, Keke, Gary and the rest of the young guys step up and help Clark lock down the run.

The Packers don't improve, then this will become a terrible move.

Time will tell.

Gutey's 1st year FA moves didn't pan out well, lets hope this years class of FA's show a lot better.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
beast
5 years ago

So what happens when Clark and/or Lowry get hurt?

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 

The same exact thing that happens when any player on any team gets hurt... life keeps moving... what if Aaron Rodgers getd hurt? Why don't we have an all pro back-up at the most important position in football? Because that's how life work man... you can't hang an entire decision of a single scary what if...

Then we’re down to players who haven’t played enough to know much of anything about them.

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 

Once again just because you don't know much about them doesn't mean others (especially Packers officials) don't as well...

And I know your not talking about me because Lancaster played enough last year that I know what we're getting when he gets on the field... he can be a good NT and Clark or Lowry can move to 3 tech... and Packers are using Z. Smith at the 3 tech on passing downs.

The jury is still out on the rest sure, but we're talking about 4th guy on a unit that usually only has two on the field, usually the 4th guy is unproven and they got more upside potential than most 4th guys.

I liked Daniels too, and thought it would be smart to keep him as well, but big multi-season view this could potentially be a very good move. Otherwise you're saying the exact same things next year, because they didn't get a shot to get on the field this year.


I’m a Gutekunst fan, but I don’t agree with this move (or letting Cobb go).

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 

Unpopular opinion at the time, but Cobb should have never been resigned to that deal, it was too much... he didn't get released from that contact soon enough.


UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
5 years ago


I guess Daniels isn't above flipping the bird to his former team. 😂
UserPostedImage
sschind
5 years ago


Once again just because you don't know much about them doesn't mean others (especially Packers officials) don't as well...

Originally Posted by: beast 



Also, just because you don't know much about them doesn't mean they are not any good. They might be better and just need their chance.

Zero2Cool
5 years ago

This will be a great move if Lowry, Keke, Gary and the rest of the young guys step up and help Clark lock down the run.

The Packers don't improve, then this will become a terrible move.

Time will tell.

Gutey's 1st year FA moves didn't pan out well, lets hope this years class of FA's show a lot better.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



What if the Packers kept Daniels and didn't improve? Would it have been a great move to not make then? Yeah, something to ponder huh? 😎 😝
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (20m) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (20m) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (34m) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (36m) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (37m) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (38m) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (38m) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (42m) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (42m) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (43m) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (43m) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (44m) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (47m) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (51m) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (53m) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (53m) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (1h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (1h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (1h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (1h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (1h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (1h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (1h) : Packers will get in
beast (1h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (1h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (1h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (3h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (4h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (4h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (4h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (5h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (14h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (14h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (14h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (18h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating
Zero2Cool (20-Dec) : There is a rule that if your name starts with 'b' you lose 15 points. Hey, I don't make the rules, I just enforce them!
wpr (20-Dec) : and then there is Beast. Running away with it all.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
45m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.