Zero2Cool
6 years ago

Absolutely. My only contention is that GB MIGHT have had a better record than the bares. But it is all conjecture. You know, the stuff that makes up 90% of the internet discussion boards. My original comment was more than likely GB would not be 6 games better but they might have been 3 games better (9-6-1) and da bares 3 games worse (9-7). It wouldn't have all been because of Mack. A healthier Rodgers would have been a factor as well.

Would I have wanted Gute to make the deal Chicago did and give away so much? No. But that is another issue for another thread. And this site does have space for a few more threads.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



The Bears jumped 6 games because of offensive scheme and their dominant defense. We gotta keep in mind, they had a stout defense to begin with. Adding Mack was fruit loops and icing on the cake. They also had a healthy set of WR if I remember right.

I wanted Mack because I like elite players. I am okay not having him because I feel we'd be falling short big time.
UserPostedImage
sschind
6 years ago

I guess I can't really remember a game last season where I thought dang if our defense was just a little better on the pass rush we'd have won. I felt the offense was big issue.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Its not that I disagree with this its just that everything is connected. However, the only way to even think about which games he could have tilted in our favor is to play the what if game and for me one of the biggest what ifs with Mack directly involves our offense. What if we had gotten Mack and Rodgers hadn't gotten hurt in the first game. Sure there were more issues with our offense than just Rodgers injury but I have to think a healthy Rodgers would have certainly helped.

That's why anything that regarding what may have happened if we had gotten Mack is pure speculation. There is simply no way to know what may have happened.
sschind
6 years ago

If for no other reason, Aaron wouldn't have faced such a tenacious pass rush in week 1. He wouldn't have been hindered with an injury and would in all probability been more effective all year.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Should have read everything before I made my last post sorry. Funny to think that maybe the most positive outcome of us getting Mack would have been on our offense and not our defense.

Can we delete posts I know we can edit.

I don't think Mack would have put us over the edge. We couldn't even make the playoffs without him. Now if we got to the 2nd round of the playoffs, I'd be thinking ya on to something.

We were far more than a Mack from being contenders.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I don't think he would have put us over either but as WPR said he may have made enough of a difference to win us the division. Of course had that happened would we be looking at McCarthy in training camp rather than MLF. If so many people would consider that a downside of us getting Mack.

KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
6 years ago
Sschind queried:

Can we delete posts I know we can edit.

No, we can not. Z2C is a ruthless taskmaster. He not only will not let us delete posts, but after a certain period of time, he won't even let you clean up typos. He is truly a unforgiving tyrant. He owns our asses.
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
Zero2Cool
6 years ago

Its not that I disagree with this its just that everything is connected. However, the only way to even think about which games he could have tilted in our favor is to play the what if game and for me one of the biggest what ifs with Mack directly involves our offense. What if we had gotten Mack and Rodgers hadn't gotten hurt in the first game. Sure there were more issues with our offense than just Rodgers injury but I have to think a healthy Rodgers would have certainly helped.

That's why anything that regarding what may have happened if we had gotten Mack is pure speculation. There is simply no way to know what may have happened.

Originally Posted by: sschind 



Aaron didn't get hurt because of Mack. He got hurt because he's fragile and the Bears front seven is menacing.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
6 years ago

Should have read everything before I made my last post sorry. Funny to think that maybe the most positive outcome of us getting Mack would have been on our offense and not our defense.

Can we delete posts I know we can edit.



I don't think he would have put us over either but as WPR said he may have made enough of a difference to win us the division. Of course had that happened would we be looking at McCarthy in training camp rather than MLF. If so many people would consider that a downside of us getting Mack.

Originally Posted by: sschind 



It's all good. Zero bought enough space to allow many many members to post similar comments. He's a genius.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
6 years ago

Aaron didn't get hurt because of Mack. He got hurt because he's fragile and the Bears front seven is menacing.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Of which Mack was a contributing factor. He elevated an elite defense another 2 notches. The pressure that he and others got to Rodgers. Without Mack the GB OL might have held the pressure at bay. We will never know.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
6 years ago

It's all good. Zero bought enough space to allow many many members to post similar comments. He's a genius.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Kiss ass.








😂 😂 😂
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
6 years ago

Kiss ass.








😂 😂 😂

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



Just stating the facts bro.
UserPostedImage
buckeyepackfan
6 years ago
Flip the switch time!

Time for Mark Murphy to go back to being CEO of The Packers and leave the football process to the guys that know what they are doing.

There's no time for woulda, shoulda, coulda

New era, new leaders!

Time to sit back and enjoy the process!
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (3h) : Bahah, I was like WTF why isn't anyone posting on PP.com ... oops no one has permissions
dfosterf (4h) : tell her I reckon
dfosterf (4h) : Micah Robinson cut. Probable PS player tomorrow. Has to call mom back and t
Zero2Cool (7h) : New site so much better. Might make switch and deal with it.
dfosterf (7h) : Mecole Hardman to our practice squad
dfosterf (7h) : Nick Nieman from Texans our 5th linebacker. Special teams signing
TheKanataThrilla (8h) : Looks like we signed Clayton Tune as QB3
wpr (8h) : TKT people lose their minds over QB3. Point is almost none of them are ready that's why they are on the PS and other teams don't take them.
TheKanataThrilla (9h) : Unfortunately he doesn't seem ready to be an emergency QB.
TheKanataThrilla (9h) : As a Canadian and a follower of Canadian University football. I am rooting for him
dfosterf (9h) : I bet a lot of us will follow the Taylor Elgersma journey with interest. Personally, got a Kurt Warner vibe goin' on. I like him
TheKanataThrilla (9h) : Not sure if either will be claimed though.
TheKanataThrilla (9h) : Tune or Hooker would make sense
dfosterf (10h) : Clayton Tune cut by the Cards? Don't know if that's the guy, we shall see
TheKanataThrilla (10h) : Per Bill Huber, the Packers will not be bringing back Taylor Elgersma or Sean Clifford on the practice squad, so a new third quarterback
Mucky Tundra (11h) : Schefter must have deleted his tweet
dfosterf (12h) : Hopefully Jerry reaches under the seat cushions and ashtrays of his jet and scrapes up the 45 million apr and spares us further nonsense
dfosterf (12h) : Have to admit the PO'd Cowboy fan videos would be fun to watch. Problem with draft picks is half their fanbase barely knows what that is
beast (12h) : I think Cowboys fans are ready to get their pitch forks and burning sticks if Jerry were to trade Micah
dfosterf (13h) : If Jerry traded Micah to GB, here in northern Va. they would have to quick build yet another data center to handle the internet hate traffic
Zero2Cool (13h) : its signing and trades that you don't hear about, other then announced
Zero2Cool (13h) : If you hear rumors about Packers sign or trade, won't happen. Not how they work
dfosterf (13h) : 19 players in a contract year. Jones called loss to us worst loss in Cowboy history. Forget Parsons trade. Not happenin' Cap'n
packerfanoutwest (14h) : The Packers, meanwhile, are the youngest team in the league for the third consecutive year.
dfosterf (16h) : That it was darkest before the dawn in Bengals and Commanders before they got deals done
Zero2Cool (17h) : what is Schefter saying?
dfosterf (17h) : He was getting Dorito infusion therapy
dfosterf (17h) : He's outta shape. Why, just the other day I saw him splayed out on the trainers table
Mucky Tundra (23h) : Parsons has followed Rasheed Walker on Twitter. Quite the choice
Mucky Tundra (23h) : Kuhn is a former player who works for the team, if somethings going down, he would be close to it
Mucky Tundra (23h) : @kuhnj30 Micah Freaking Parsons
Mucky Tundra (23h) : A LOT of buzz on the Bird App regarding Parsons; even Schefter is saying it's serious
dfosterf (26-Aug) : *Orzech*
dfosterf (26-Aug) : Orzich long snapper 3 yr extension
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : Packers signed someone for three year deal
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : lol i know it's insane ... sign up for the waiver wire then you'll know
wpr (26-Aug) : YES!!!!!!
Mucky Tundra (26-Aug) : WE WANT THE LIST! WE WANT THE LIST!
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : @JJLahey · 2m Holy crap, Packers, where the heck is the list?
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : haha folks on Tweeter every year this time ... 'where is list Packers!!" hahaha
wpr (26-Aug) : He played pretty good.
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : NAZIR STACKHOUSE HAS MADE THE 53
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : NOOOOO KALEN IS GONE
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : Kalen King and Kamal Hadden making it. me thinks
schroeder84 (26-Aug) : @dfosterf I suspect Elgersma WILL be hard to hide. Raw, but talented
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : pp.com is broken, halt testing, gotta go do work things for a bit
hardrocker950 (26-Aug) : Mecole Hardman was released, to the surprise of few
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : PP.com updated. Reset Password works, and now User Profile pages are a thing
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : Soft hope plan is having fantasy football weekly on-site that i build. cannot do that with this setup.
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : It's older technology, resource hog, cannot be upgraded/changed. That's to start.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
3h / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

3h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

27-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

26-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

25-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

24-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

24-Aug / Around The NFL / beast

23-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

22-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.