wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
5 years ago

Where does the receiver group stand entering OTAs? The Green Bay Packers  will go into the start of Organized Team Activities next week with a whopping 12 wide receivers on their 90-man roster. Although only one or two players are well and truly guaranteed to have a place on the team when the cut-down to 53 takes place after training camp, it is clear now that there are tiers of players at the position that can be separated based on their likelihood of making the team.
Today, APC examines the players in play to catch passes from Aaron Rodgers  in the coming weeks and sorts them into a few categories.
Locks
Davante Adams 
Not much to discuss here, folks. Adams  is a top-five NFL receiver who nearly cracked 1,400 yards a year ago with 13 touchdowns. Still just 26 until Christmas Eve, he’s only going to get better over the next couple of seasons.
Geronimo Allison 
The Packers offered Allison a one-year restricted free agent tender this offseason, then locked him up with a one-year contract for a $2.8 total value, exceeding that tender’s number. Before his injury last year, Allison was on pace for over 1,100 yards through four games, and he continues to be overlooked by NFL writers who criticize the Packers’ receiver depth.  Beyond that, he appears to be a nice fit for the slot receiver position in Matt LaFleur’s offense. 
Given that contract and his trust level with Aaron Rodgers , he’s not going anywhere this year.
Safe bets
Marquez Valdes-Scantling 
Last year’s fifth-round draft pick had one of the better years for a Packers rookie receiver in recent memory, thanks to added opportunities after injuries to Allison and Randall Cobb. However, he did much of his damage in a seven-week stretch around midseason and faded noticeably down the stretch as another rookie earned more targets and playing time.
Still, the exceptional speed that MVS possesses should be an exciting weapon for Matt LaFleur, who loves to design shot plays for his fastest receivers. That puts MVS squarely in the running for a key role in 2019. The only danger is if he completely falls apart in training camp.
Equanimeous St. Brown 
Like MVS above, St. Brown  flashed plenty of ability, using his size and route-running to work his way open for Rodgers. He earned more playing time in the latter stages of the season, and capped off his rookie year with a very impressive five-target, five-reception, 94-yard day against the Jets  prior to suffering a concussion. Expect EQ to be a key component of this roster, though he could get passed up if one of the bubble players has an exceptional camp.
Bubble players
Trevor Davis 

Entering the final year of his rookie contract, Davis  is essentially a return specialist. He has flashed plenty of ability there, particularly on punt returns, and the Packers don’t have another explosive option on returns — Tramon Williams  is reliable but not spectacular, while Jaire Alexander  will probably be kept off that job to focus on defense instead. If Davis  can provide any semblance of a contribution as a receiver, he could earn a roster spot for his special teams contributions alone.
Jake Kumerow 
Through two preseason games last summer, it looked like Kumerow  was well on his way to being the Packers’ #4 receiver. He was catching everything, he seemed to be connecting with Rodgers, and he made a few big plays in games. Then, he injured his shoulder on a roll into the end zone, costing him the first half of the season.
Still, once he returned, Kumerow  made a few great plays, including a big 49-yard touchdown in the Packers’ comeback over the Jets. He looks like a great #4 or #5 option who would be willing to pitch in on special teams, and there’s always room for a player like that. He’ll need to beat out at least one of the other bubble players here to get there, though.
J’Mon Moore 
The highest-drafted of the Packers’ 2018 rookie receivers, Moore ’s only notable catch in preseason was hauling in a case of the drops. The route-running skills that made him a fourth-round pick still look good and that could be his ticket onto the team as a #5 — but only if he can catch the ball consistently and show effort on every play.
Dark horses
Allen Lazard 
Lazard ’s 6-foot-5, 227-pound frame makes him seem like a potential big slot option. He’s not bulky enough for now to make a switch to tight end, but he could create similar matchup problems on the inside that a tight end would flexed out off the line of scrimmage. Lazard  was a consistent threat for four years at Iowa State, particularly in the red zone, and with a year of NFL experience under his belt he may make some noise in training camp and could take a spot away from one of the bubble players with a good preseason.
Darrius Shepherd
Shepherd provides a combination of qualities that few other players on the roster do: production from the slot plus return ability. He was a slot machine for North Dakota State over the past few years, and contributed on punt returns as well. That makes him a sneaky play to steal away a roster spot from someone like Davis.
Long shots

Jawill Davis 
Like Trevor, Jawill Davis  is also a return specialist who will need to make his mark on special teams in order to gain any serious traction towards a roster spot. He has great straight-line speed but is not very shifty.
Matthew Eaton
Think of Eaton as like a more agile Geronimo Allison , but with a significantly lower production level in college. Eaton is 6-foot-4 and 209 pounds, and he ran a 4.66-second 40-yard dash at Iowa State’s Pro Day. Allison is 6-foot-3 and 202, and his 40 was 4.67 seconds at the 2016 Combine. Eaton’s got a half-second edge on Allison’s 3-cone time, though, the only major testing difference between the two.
However, Eaton — who transferred to Ames from Temple — was always a depth receiver, sitting behind Lazard , Hakeem Butler, and a few other players in the receiving pecking order. As a result, he finished his career with just 49 receptions for 523 yards and six touchdowns, numbers that Allison eclipsed easily. There doesn’t appear to be much room for him here, and a standout performance in camp is probably necessary for him to find a practice squad spot.
Teo Redding 
The former Bowling Green Falcon finished last season on the Packers’ practice squad after spending training camp with the Detroit Lions  and getting a week’s work on the practice squad in Washington. Redding  has the best all-around movement skills in this tier of players, as he’s pretty fast (4.46), pretty explosive (38.5-inch vert, 11-foot broad), and agile (6.85 3-cone) but he’s also very lightly built at 6-foot-1 and just 176 pounds. The odds of him making a strong roster push are probably low as a result.


[/URL]      


Continue Reading @ [url=https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/2019/5/9/18536673/handicapping-the-packers-wide-receiver-roster-battle-in-2019]Evan "Tex" Western 

Evan "Tex" Western wrote:



It will be interesting to see how it all shapes up.
Every year I wonder if Davis is going to make the team. Every year he does. We shall see if he does this year.
UserPostedImage
TheKanataThrilla
5 years ago
Wondering if we look at trading any of our WRs. I am thinking J'mon or Geronimo could be traded. J'mon because we don't want to give up on a 4th rounder so early. Geronimo because Gute is a RAS guy and Gmo is not.

Thinking Davis is replaced by Shepherd.

Lazard is bubble. Hope he can contribute on ST because I think he can be an interesting big slot guy.
gbguy20
5 years ago
Goodbye Trevor.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
nerdmann
5 years ago

Wondering if we look at trading any of our WRs. I am thinking J'mon or Geronimo could be traded. J'mon because we don't want to give up on a 4th rounder so early. Geronimo because Gute is a RAS guy and Gmo is not.

Thinking Davis is replaced by Shepherd.

Lazard is bubble. Hope he can contribute on ST because I think he can be an interesting big slot guy.

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla 



Trevor Davis has value as a gunner and punt returner right out of the gate. If he can figure out how to run routes, we could really get something good for him. But then again we might wanna keep him if he can produce from scrimmage.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
sschind
5 years ago

Wondering if we look at trading any of our WRs. I am thinking J'mon or Geronimo could be traded. J'mon because we don't want to give up on a 4th rounder so early. Geronimo because Gute is a RAS guy and Gmo is not.

Thinking Davis is replaced by Shepherd.

Lazard is bubble. Hope he can contribute on ST because I think he can be an interesting big slot guy.

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla 



Both have some trade value. G'mo because he has some experience and J'mon because of his high draft status and the fact that he is only in his second year but I'd be willing to bet every team has a Geronimo Allison and J'Mon Moore on their team. A conditional 7th round pick maybe a 6th rounder would be the most I would expect either of them to be worth and it would be better than cutting them outright but I'm guessing the options would be trade or cut so if I am another GM unless I'm completely in love with either of them or way down on the waiver list I wait until they are cut and take my chances they reach me.

Not sure what RAS is but I'd be very leery of going into the season with Adams as the only guy with more than 1 year of experience at WR so unless they signed a veteran (who could they afford who would be better the Allison?) I'd rather keep him. He was looking pretty good through the first 4 games of last year so unless the injury slows him down he certainly has a leg up on the #2 position going into camp and its his spot to lose. That said it would not surprise me if one of the other (MVS or ESB) eventually beat him out.

There are a lot names on the list but none stand out other than Adams. IMO Adams, Allison, Valdez-Scantling, St. Brown are pretty much locks. The last 2 based on rookie numbers and having been drafted. The rest its a toss up for the last 2 spots and I would think they are all hoping the Packers keep 7.

Davis has to hope that no one beats him out as a return man and if no one does I can see them keeping him as the 7th WR and if no one does beat him out I am fine with that.

Rockmolder
5 years ago

Both have some trade value. G'mo because he has some experience and J'mon because of his high draft status and the fact that he is only in his second year but I'd be willing to bet every team has a Geronimo Allison and J'Mon Moore on their team. A conditional 7th round pick maybe a 6th rounder would be the most I would expect either of them to be worth and it would be better than cutting them outright but I'm guessing the options would be trade or cut so if I am another GM unless I'm completely in love with either of them or way down on the waiver list I wait until they are cut and take my chances they reach me.

Originally Posted by: sschind 



I agree. I doubt we'd get a lot for them. I doubt even more that either of them will not be on our roster opening day.

Not sure what RAS is but I'd be very leery of going into the season with Adams as the only guy with more than 1 year of experience at WR so unless they signed a veteran (who could they afford who would be better the Allison?) I'd rather keep him.

He was looking pretty good through the first 4 games of last year so unless the injury slows him down he certainly has a leg up on the #2 position going into camp and its his spot to lose. That said it would not surprise me if one of the other (MVS or ESB) eventually beat him out.



Relative Athletic Score. And while I agree that Gute seems to like athletic players a lot, it'd be a big mistake to cut football players for athletes, even if the football players are producing. I can't see Gute gutting a team just to get his type of guys in and Geronimo is the closest thing you have to a real number 2 wide receiver at this point in time. Even as a 3rd or 4th receiver, I'd gladly keep him around. I think the Packers feel the same way, since they went over the $ 2 million minimum tender they had on him by $ 800.000.
sschind
5 years ago
Thanks Rock. It seems that every year or so a new term pops up that is thrown about relentlessly. I can't say I had ever heard of RAS before this year but I saw it everywhere (didn't know what it meant) a couple of years ago it was catch radius. Don't think I saw that term once this year. I wonder what it will be next year?
Nonstopdrivel
5 years ago
sschind does a good job of pointing out that a football player, like an automobile, is a rapidly depreciating asset. We see it every single year, and yet it continues to surprise me just how fast young players drop in trade value. The moment they're taken off the draft board, you might as well lop a round off your expectation of return, because that's the bare minimum they're going to drop if you put them on the block.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (15h) : TD but another failed 2 pt conversion!
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Ravens still alive, but barely
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Or not...BUT THAT CATCH BY NACUA
Mucky Tundra (19h) : WE MAY HAVE BEEN PREMATURE KANATA
TheKanataThrilla (19h) : Time to make dinner
TheKanataThrilla (19h) : Ouch!!!! Dagger for the Eagles
Mucky Tundra (19h) : DAGGER
TheKanataThrilla (19h) : pass plays
TheKanataThrilla (19h) : Seems some of their passes are too deep. Reminds me of MLF as well.
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Oren Burks with a clutch pass break up...I will now light myself on fire
Mucky Tundra (19h) : a run on 2nd down and 17 from McVay? So that's where MLF gets it from!
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Do or die time for the Rams
TheKanataThrilla (19h) : Kicking field goals are impressive
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Oh that might be a backbreaker
Mucky Tundra (19h) : That's what I thought too, just wasn't sure
TheKanataThrilla (20h) : Kicking doesn't make much sense
Mucky Tundra (20h) : If the Rams score a TD on the upcoming drive, they go for 2, right?
TheKanataThrilla (20h) : Stafford is pretty good with 4th quarter comebacks. I would like to see it.
Mucky Tundra (20h) : YUGE stand by the Rams D there
Mucky Tundra (20h) : killer penalty!
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Philly has to go for this right?
Mucky Tundra (20h) : FUMBLE
TheKanataThrilla (20h) : pre-safety
TheKanataThrilla (20h) : Hurts being a gamer, that tackle on him looked painful on his knee
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Ooo a safety! Things are getting spicy
Martha Careful (20h) : quick analysis, Philly Oline, for the most part, is what our Oline should strive to be
Zero2Cool (21h) : I just saw score. Teams are really struggling with place kicks.
Martha Careful (22h) : nevermind...its on NBC
Martha Careful (22h) : does anyone have a thread to a broadcast? I do not have Peacock.
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Baltimore-Buffalo line has been BAL -1 to -1.5. Gotta be rare that a divisional home team that won 13 games is an underdog at home
Martha Careful (19-Jan) : Ironically, our QB played the best of all 3
beast (19-Jan) : 0-3 NFC North Dominated the Regular season and shutout in the post season
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Burn Detroit to the ground over losing to the Commanders? Bit extreme
packerfanoutwest (19-Jan) : Burn your city Lion fans!!
packerfanoutwest (19-Jan) : suck it lions!!!
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Knew that playoffs loss for the Lions would hit like crack but I could absolutely OD on this
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Gonna sleep better after that game
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : goodnight!
Martha Careful (19-Jan) : goodnight
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : (not you Martha, it's a saying lol)
Martha Careful (19-Jan) : America loves an underdog
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : That'll do pig, that'll do
Martha Careful (19-Jan) : 4 turnovers by Goff
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : that INT was definately on Goff!
Martha Careful (19-Jan) : we arent the only guys who blow contain
Martha Careful (19-Jan) : it should be 4th down
Martha Careful (19-Jan) : I can't blame the call, Ijust would have gone for it
Martha Careful (19-Jan) : miss
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : I had the feeling he was gonna miss
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : The football gods chortled
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
33m / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

51m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

19-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

18-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.