wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
5 years ago

Where does the receiver group stand entering OTAs? The Green Bay Packers  will go into the start of Organized Team Activities next week with a whopping 12 wide receivers on their 90-man roster. Although only one or two players are well and truly guaranteed to have a place on the team when the cut-down to 53 takes place after training camp, it is clear now that there are tiers of players at the position that can be separated based on their likelihood of making the team.
Today, APC examines the players in play to catch passes from Aaron Rodgers  in the coming weeks and sorts them into a few categories.
Locks
Davante Adams 
Not much to discuss here, folks. Adams  is a top-five NFL receiver who nearly cracked 1,400 yards a year ago with 13 touchdowns. Still just 26 until Christmas Eve, he’s only going to get better over the next couple of seasons.
Geronimo Allison 
The Packers offered Allison a one-year restricted free agent tender this offseason, then locked him up with a one-year contract for a $2.8 total value, exceeding that tender’s number. Before his injury last year, Allison was on pace for over 1,100 yards through four games, and he continues to be overlooked by NFL writers who criticize the Packers’ receiver depth.  Beyond that, he appears to be a nice fit for the slot receiver position in Matt LaFleur’s offense. 
Given that contract and his trust level with Aaron Rodgers , he’s not going anywhere this year.
Safe bets
Marquez Valdes-Scantling 
Last year’s fifth-round draft pick had one of the better years for a Packers rookie receiver in recent memory, thanks to added opportunities after injuries to Allison and Randall Cobb. However, he did much of his damage in a seven-week stretch around midseason and faded noticeably down the stretch as another rookie earned more targets and playing time.
Still, the exceptional speed that MVS possesses should be an exciting weapon for Matt LaFleur, who loves to design shot plays for his fastest receivers. That puts MVS squarely in the running for a key role in 2019. The only danger is if he completely falls apart in training camp.
Equanimeous St. Brown 
Like MVS above, St. Brown  flashed plenty of ability, using his size and route-running to work his way open for Rodgers. He earned more playing time in the latter stages of the season, and capped off his rookie year with a very impressive five-target, five-reception, 94-yard day against the Jets  prior to suffering a concussion. Expect EQ to be a key component of this roster, though he could get passed up if one of the bubble players has an exceptional camp.
Bubble players
Trevor Davis 

Entering the final year of his rookie contract, Davis  is essentially a return specialist. He has flashed plenty of ability there, particularly on punt returns, and the Packers don’t have another explosive option on returns — Tramon Williams  is reliable but not spectacular, while Jaire Alexander  will probably be kept off that job to focus on defense instead. If Davis  can provide any semblance of a contribution as a receiver, he could earn a roster spot for his special teams contributions alone.
Jake Kumerow 
Through two preseason games last summer, it looked like Kumerow  was well on his way to being the Packers’ #4 receiver. He was catching everything, he seemed to be connecting with Rodgers, and he made a few big plays in games. Then, he injured his shoulder on a roll into the end zone, costing him the first half of the season.
Still, once he returned, Kumerow  made a few great plays, including a big 49-yard touchdown in the Packers’ comeback over the Jets. He looks like a great #4 or #5 option who would be willing to pitch in on special teams, and there’s always room for a player like that. He’ll need to beat out at least one of the other bubble players here to get there, though.
J’Mon Moore 
The highest-drafted of the Packers’ 2018 rookie receivers, Moore ’s only notable catch in preseason was hauling in a case of the drops. The route-running skills that made him a fourth-round pick still look good and that could be his ticket onto the team as a #5 — but only if he can catch the ball consistently and show effort on every play.
Dark horses
Allen Lazard 
Lazard ’s 6-foot-5, 227-pound frame makes him seem like a potential big slot option. He’s not bulky enough for now to make a switch to tight end, but he could create similar matchup problems on the inside that a tight end would flexed out off the line of scrimmage. Lazard  was a consistent threat for four years at Iowa State, particularly in the red zone, and with a year of NFL experience under his belt he may make some noise in training camp and could take a spot away from one of the bubble players with a good preseason.
Darrius Shepherd
Shepherd provides a combination of qualities that few other players on the roster do: production from the slot plus return ability. He was a slot machine for North Dakota State over the past few years, and contributed on punt returns as well. That makes him a sneaky play to steal away a roster spot from someone like Davis.
Long shots

Jawill Davis 
Like Trevor, Jawill Davis  is also a return specialist who will need to make his mark on special teams in order to gain any serious traction towards a roster spot. He has great straight-line speed but is not very shifty.
Matthew Eaton
Think of Eaton as like a more agile Geronimo Allison , but with a significantly lower production level in college. Eaton is 6-foot-4 and 209 pounds, and he ran a 4.66-second 40-yard dash at Iowa State’s Pro Day. Allison is 6-foot-3 and 202, and his 40 was 4.67 seconds at the 2016 Combine. Eaton’s got a half-second edge on Allison’s 3-cone time, though, the only major testing difference between the two.
However, Eaton — who transferred to Ames from Temple — was always a depth receiver, sitting behind Lazard , Hakeem Butler, and a few other players in the receiving pecking order. As a result, he finished his career with just 49 receptions for 523 yards and six touchdowns, numbers that Allison eclipsed easily. There doesn’t appear to be much room for him here, and a standout performance in camp is probably necessary for him to find a practice squad spot.
Teo Redding 
The former Bowling Green Falcon finished last season on the Packers’ practice squad after spending training camp with the Detroit Lions  and getting a week’s work on the practice squad in Washington. Redding  has the best all-around movement skills in this tier of players, as he’s pretty fast (4.46), pretty explosive (38.5-inch vert, 11-foot broad), and agile (6.85 3-cone) but he’s also very lightly built at 6-foot-1 and just 176 pounds. The odds of him making a strong roster push are probably low as a result.


[/URL]      


Continue Reading @ [url=https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/2019/5/9/18536673/handicapping-the-packers-wide-receiver-roster-battle-in-2019]Evan "Tex" Western 

Evan "Tex" Western wrote:



It will be interesting to see how it all shapes up.
Every year I wonder if Davis is going to make the team. Every year he does. We shall see if he does this year.
UserPostedImage
TheKanataThrilla
5 years ago
Wondering if we look at trading any of our WRs. I am thinking J'mon or Geronimo could be traded. J'mon because we don't want to give up on a 4th rounder so early. Geronimo because Gute is a RAS guy and Gmo is not.

Thinking Davis is replaced by Shepherd.

Lazard is bubble. Hope he can contribute on ST because I think he can be an interesting big slot guy.
gbguy20
5 years ago
Goodbye Trevor.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
nerdmann
5 years ago

Wondering if we look at trading any of our WRs. I am thinking J'mon or Geronimo could be traded. J'mon because we don't want to give up on a 4th rounder so early. Geronimo because Gute is a RAS guy and Gmo is not.

Thinking Davis is replaced by Shepherd.

Lazard is bubble. Hope he can contribute on ST because I think he can be an interesting big slot guy.

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla 



Trevor Davis has value as a gunner and punt returner right out of the gate. If he can figure out how to run routes, we could really get something good for him. But then again we might wanna keep him if he can produce from scrimmage.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
sschind
5 years ago

Wondering if we look at trading any of our WRs. I am thinking J'mon or Geronimo could be traded. J'mon because we don't want to give up on a 4th rounder so early. Geronimo because Gute is a RAS guy and Gmo is not.

Thinking Davis is replaced by Shepherd.

Lazard is bubble. Hope he can contribute on ST because I think he can be an interesting big slot guy.

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla 



Both have some trade value. G'mo because he has some experience and J'mon because of his high draft status and the fact that he is only in his second year but I'd be willing to bet every team has a Geronimo Allison and J'Mon Moore on their team. A conditional 7th round pick maybe a 6th rounder would be the most I would expect either of them to be worth and it would be better than cutting them outright but I'm guessing the options would be trade or cut so if I am another GM unless I'm completely in love with either of them or way down on the waiver list I wait until they are cut and take my chances they reach me.

Not sure what RAS is but I'd be very leery of going into the season with Adams as the only guy with more than 1 year of experience at WR so unless they signed a veteran (who could they afford who would be better the Allison?) I'd rather keep him. He was looking pretty good through the first 4 games of last year so unless the injury slows him down he certainly has a leg up on the #2 position going into camp and its his spot to lose. That said it would not surprise me if one of the other (MVS or ESB) eventually beat him out.

There are a lot names on the list but none stand out other than Adams. IMO Adams, Allison, Valdez-Scantling, St. Brown are pretty much locks. The last 2 based on rookie numbers and having been drafted. The rest its a toss up for the last 2 spots and I would think they are all hoping the Packers keep 7.

Davis has to hope that no one beats him out as a return man and if no one does I can see them keeping him as the 7th WR and if no one does beat him out I am fine with that.

Rockmolder
5 years ago

Both have some trade value. G'mo because he has some experience and J'mon because of his high draft status and the fact that he is only in his second year but I'd be willing to bet every team has a Geronimo Allison and J'Mon Moore on their team. A conditional 7th round pick maybe a 6th rounder would be the most I would expect either of them to be worth and it would be better than cutting them outright but I'm guessing the options would be trade or cut so if I am another GM unless I'm completely in love with either of them or way down on the waiver list I wait until they are cut and take my chances they reach me.

Originally Posted by: sschind 



I agree. I doubt we'd get a lot for them. I doubt even more that either of them will not be on our roster opening day.

Not sure what RAS is but I'd be very leery of going into the season with Adams as the only guy with more than 1 year of experience at WR so unless they signed a veteran (who could they afford who would be better the Allison?) I'd rather keep him.

He was looking pretty good through the first 4 games of last year so unless the injury slows him down he certainly has a leg up on the #2 position going into camp and its his spot to lose. That said it would not surprise me if one of the other (MVS or ESB) eventually beat him out.



Relative Athletic Score. And while I agree that Gute seems to like athletic players a lot, it'd be a big mistake to cut football players for athletes, even if the football players are producing. I can't see Gute gutting a team just to get his type of guys in and Geronimo is the closest thing you have to a real number 2 wide receiver at this point in time. Even as a 3rd or 4th receiver, I'd gladly keep him around. I think the Packers feel the same way, since they went over the $ 2 million minimum tender they had on him by $ 800.000.
sschind
5 years ago
Thanks Rock. It seems that every year or so a new term pops up that is thrown about relentlessly. I can't say I had ever heard of RAS before this year but I saw it everywhere (didn't know what it meant) a couple of years ago it was catch radius. Don't think I saw that term once this year. I wonder what it will be next year?
Nonstopdrivel
5 years ago
sschind does a good job of pointing out that a football player, like an automobile, is a rapidly depreciating asset. We see it every single year, and yet it continues to surprise me just how fast young players drop in trade value. The moment they're taken off the draft board, you might as well lop a round off your expectation of return, because that's the bare minimum they're going to drop if you put them on the block.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (28m) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (45m) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (1h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (1h) : now 3
Zero2Cool (2h) : Who? What?
beast (10h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (15h) : meh
Zero2Cool (19h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (19h) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (19h) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (22h) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (22h) : Only 4
wpr (22h) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.