Packers “Zeroing In” On Titans OC Matt LaFleur As Their New Head Coach· Page 8

Smokey
Veteran Member

5 years ago

IMO, GB began last year to evolve past the Ted Thompson era, however they made one large error that is still dragging the Packers down, Ted Thompson is still on the payroll. There should have been a clean break, yet it did not happen. Cut him lose and leave that trolling anchor on the pier before The Packers"sail" again. You don't divorce wife #1 and keep her hanging around wife #2, that's a recipe for disaster(like a 6-9-1 season).

Clean out the house. Keep the best and replace what does not fit in the new "Packers". From Coaches to Scouts to Players, make it clear that only winners get GB Packer paychecks. You don't clean out your refrigerator and not throw out that moldy cheese.

[whip2]

nerdmann
Premier Member

5 years ago

#72

PFFFT! You have no idea what you are talking about. GB hired Matt LaFleur because Aaron Rodgers said so. Aaron wants someone he can push around as HC.

Originally Posted by: wpr

Hoping this is not true, can't disprove it.

We shall see how it all plays out.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

gbguy20
Veteran Member

5 years ago

#73

Hoping this is not true, can't disprove it.

We shall see how it all plays out.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

......

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

beast
Select Member

5 years ago

#74

Hoping this is not true, can't disprove it.

We shall see how it all plays out.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

What do you mean can't disprove it? ... if Rodgers wanted someone to push around, couldn't he just get some old man? Not someone young and as good healthy shape as he is 😝 JK

nerdmann
Premier Member

5 years ago

#75

What do you mean can't disprove it? ... if Rodgers wanted someone to push around, couldn't he just get some old man? Not someone young and as good healthy shape as he is 😝 JK

Originally Posted by: beast

You mean like Mark Murphy? 😉

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

beast
Select Member

5 years ago

#76

You mean like Mark Murphy? ;)

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Touché 👍

Though it seems it's internet conspiracy theorist, who are trying to convince fans that they know the truth about what's going on, vs. people that actually work in the industry and actually know these people in real life.
https://packerswire.usatoday.com/2019/01/07/dilfer-orlovsky-show-support-for-packers-hiring-matt-lafleur/

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member Topic Starter

5 years ago

#77

played for em twice

Dan Orlovsky wrote:

LeFleur is an “’em”? Is there more than one of him, or is his preferred gender plural?

beast
Select Member

5 years ago

#78

LeFleur is an “’em”? Is there more than one of him, or is his preferred gender plural?

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

It's Twitter, you only get so many characters so people shorten some words to save a character or two, and sometimes they make odd choices in which ones...

So "him" becomes "em" in this case...

I wonder what LaFleur demonstrated during his interview to leapfrog McDaniels -- or if, as I've found myself wondering multiple times over the past few weeks, Green Bay's rumored interest in McDaniels was always a smokescreen.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

Current rumor is that ex-Buc OC was the runner up for both the Packers and Jets head coaching job. (I wonder if he'd make a good OC for the Packers, sounds like the Jags are interviewing him for their job)

https://247sports.com/nfl/green-bay-packers/Article/Todd-Monken-Packers-head-coach-strong-candidate--127537154/Amp/

I don't think the Packers rumored interested in McDaniels was a smokescreen, at least not one by the Packers.

I think it's simply the media and fans trying to connect the hottest names to the hottest QBs, and pretend like they know what's going on and talk about the possiblies.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

5 years ago

#79

Is it just me, or is anyone uneasy hiring a guy after one interview? Not just him, but anybody. Do we have people who know him? Just asking?

Originally Posted by: KRK

When Brian, Mark and Russ agreed that Matt was the top candidate, Brian had Aaron call Matt. Perhaps that discussion between the QB and HC was the the second interview?

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

5 years ago

#80

It's Twitter, you only get so many characters so people shorten some words to save a character or two, and sometimes they make odd choices in which ones...

So "him" becomes "em" in this case...

Current rumor is that ex-Buc OC was the runner up for both the Packers and Jets head coaching job. (I wonder if he'd make a good OC for the Packers, sounds like the Jags are interviewing him for their job)

https://247sports.com/nfl/green-bay-packers/Article/Todd-Monken-Packers-head-coach-strong-candidate--127537154/Amp/

I don't think the Packers rumored interested in McDaniels was a smokescreen, at least not one by the Packers.

I think it's simply the media and fans trying to connect the hottest names to the hottest QBs, and pretend like they know what's going on and talk about the possiblies.

Originally Posted by: beast

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (28m) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (28m) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (28m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (36m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (37m) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (57m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (4h) : Packers will get in

beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS