Packers “Zeroing In” On Titans OC Matt LaFleur As Their New Head Coach· Page 8

Smokey
Veteran Member

6 years ago

IMO, GB began last year to evolve past the Ted Thompson era, however they made one large error that is still dragging the Packers down, Ted Thompson is still on the payroll. There should have been a clean break, yet it did not happen. Cut him lose and leave that trolling anchor on the pier before The Packers"sail" again. You don't divorce wife #1 and keep her hanging around wife #2, that's a recipe for disaster(like a 6-9-1 season).

Clean out the house. Keep the best and replace what does not fit in the new "Packers". From Coaches to Scouts to Players, make it clear that only winners get GB Packer paychecks. You don't clean out your refrigerator and not throw out that moldy cheese.

[whip2]

nerdmann
Premier Member

6 years ago

#72

PFFFT! You have no idea what you are talking about. GB hired Matt LaFleur because Aaron Rodgers said so. Aaron wants someone he can push around as HC.

Originally Posted by: wpr

Hoping this is not true, can't disprove it.

We shall see how it all plays out.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

gbguy20
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#73

Hoping this is not true, can't disprove it.

We shall see how it all plays out.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

......

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

beast
Select Member

6 years ago

#74

Hoping this is not true, can't disprove it.

We shall see how it all plays out.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

What do you mean can't disprove it? ... if Rodgers wanted someone to push around, couldn't he just get some old man? Not someone young and as good healthy shape as he is 😝 JK

nerdmann
Premier Member

6 years ago

#75

What do you mean can't disprove it? ... if Rodgers wanted someone to push around, couldn't he just get some old man? Not someone young and as good healthy shape as he is 😝 JK

Originally Posted by: beast

You mean like Mark Murphy? 😉

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

beast
Select Member

6 years ago

#76

You mean like Mark Murphy? ;)

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Touché 👍

Though it seems it's internet conspiracy theorist, who are trying to convince fans that they know the truth about what's going on, vs. people that actually work in the industry and actually know these people in real life.
https://packerswire.usatoday.com/2019/01/07/dilfer-orlovsky-show-support-for-packers-hiring-matt-lafleur/

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member Topic Starter

6 years ago

#77

played for em twice

Dan Orlovsky wrote:

LeFleur is an “’em”? Is there more than one of him, or is his preferred gender plural?

beast
Select Member

6 years ago

#78

LeFleur is an “’em”? Is there more than one of him, or is his preferred gender plural?

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

It's Twitter, you only get so many characters so people shorten some words to save a character or two, and sometimes they make odd choices in which ones...

So "him" becomes "em" in this case...

I wonder what LaFleur demonstrated during his interview to leapfrog McDaniels -- or if, as I've found myself wondering multiple times over the past few weeks, Green Bay's rumored interest in McDaniels was always a smokescreen.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

Current rumor is that ex-Buc OC was the runner up for both the Packers and Jets head coaching job. (I wonder if he'd make a good OC for the Packers, sounds like the Jags are interviewing him for their job)

https://247sports.com/nfl/green-bay-packers/Article/Todd-Monken-Packers-head-coach-strong-candidate--127537154/Amp/

I don't think the Packers rumored interested in McDaniels was a smokescreen, at least not one by the Packers.

I think it's simply the media and fans trying to connect the hottest names to the hottest QBs, and pretend like they know what's going on and talk about the possiblies.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

6 years ago

#79

Is it just me, or is anyone uneasy hiring a guy after one interview? Not just him, but anybody. Do we have people who know him? Just asking?

Originally Posted by: KRK

When Brian, Mark and Russ agreed that Matt was the top candidate, Brian had Aaron call Matt. Perhaps that discussion between the QB and HC was the the second interview?

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

6 years ago

#80

It's Twitter, you only get so many characters so people shorten some words to save a character or two, and sometimes they make odd choices in which ones...

So "him" becomes "em" in this case...

Current rumor is that ex-Buc OC was the runner up for both the Packers and Jets head coaching job. (I wonder if he'd make a good OC for the Packers, sounds like the Jags are interviewing him for their job)

https://247sports.com/nfl/green-bay-packers/Article/Todd-Monken-Packers-head-coach-strong-candidate--127537154/Amp/

I don't think the Packers rumored interested in McDaniels was a smokescreen, at least not one by the Packers.

I think it's simply the media and fans trying to connect the hottest names to the hottest QBs, and pretend like they know what's going on and talk about the possiblies.

Originally Posted by: beast

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

TheKanataThrilla (47m) : Exactly buck...Washington came up with the ball. It is just a shitty coincidence one week later

buckeyepackfan (48m) : I forgot, they corrected the call a week later. Lol btw HAPPY BIRTHDAY dhazer!

buckeyepackfan (49m) : That brings up the question, why wasn't Nixon down by contact? I think that was the point Kanata was making.

buckeyepackfan (55m) : Turnovers rule, win the turnover battle, win the game.

packerfanoutwest (56m) : well, he was

TheKanataThrilla (1h) : Eagles down by contact on the fumble....fuck you NFL

Mucky Tundra (1h) : I think this games over

beast (2h) : Eagles sure get a lot of fumbles on kickoffs

Mucky Tundra (2h) : This game looks too big for Washington

packerfanoutwest (5h) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns

packerfanoutwest (5h) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts

packerfanoutwest (5h) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,

beast (16h) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)

beast (21h) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab

Zero2Cool (23h) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?

Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me

Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not

Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!

beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋

Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.

dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.

beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.

beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?

beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you

wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.

wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.

wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious

beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere

beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.

beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.

beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...

beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered

wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.

wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22