Clutch quarterback · PACKERSHOME

yooperfan
Veteran Member Topic Starter

6 years ago

Is Aaron Rodgers a clutch quarterback?
According toNewsweek Magazine, Arron Rodgers is 0-37 when entering the fourth quarter trailing by more than one point against teams with a winning record.
Thoughts???

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

6 years ago

I know that certainly used to be true, but I'm not sure of the current numbers. What is the date on that article?

yooperfan
Veteran Member Topic Starter

6 years ago

I know that certainly used to be true, but I'm not sure of the current numbers. What is the date on that article?

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

November 30th 2018.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

6 years ago

I'd be curious as to what other QB's are as well. This almost feels like a QB is 0 - whatever when trailing at the end of the 4th quarter kinda stat.

Aaron Rodgers going into something like 13th NFL season, 10th as starter and ~40 games a team that finished the season better than .500 was leading going into the 4th quarter. Does that mean the Packers were tied or leading in all the other games?

Something else that is clutch, how many times did Aaron Rodgers lead the Packers to a leading score in this scenario and the defense or special teams give up points?

I know that certainly used to be true, but I'm not sure of the current numbers. What is the date on that article?

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

https://ftw.usatoday.com/2018/11/nfl-packers-aaron-rodgers-clutch-fourth-quarter-comebacks-stat

nerdmann
Premier Member

6 years ago

In other words, it's hard to come back from behind against good teams.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

yooperfan
Veteran Member Topic Starter

6 years ago

Nice to see people digging into this.
So far, not looking good.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

6 years ago

So far, not looking good.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan

Except it's nothing new. We've known for years that, for whatever reason, Aaron Rodgers is a frontrunning quarterback. Whether due to defensive collapses, porous offensive line play, or his own questionable decisions in the clutch, if Green Bay is down late in the game, Rodgers probably isn't bailing them out.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

6 years ago

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

Every QB is a front running QB. We don't have the statistics for others under the same parameters. Why? Because it takes away from the narrative. We don't have the statistics on QB who have taken lead late and special teams or defense lost the lead.

QB wins are not legitimate Stat. It's a team game.

wpr
Preferred Member

6 years ago

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Agreed. The same can be said for a team leading by a few points and the defense gives up a score. The qb might give his team the lead once again only to watch the defense cough it up one more time.

Then there is the team trailing and the defense gets the pick 6 for the win. The qb gets the win on his record.

It's all so ambiguous. Proof that statistics can and do lie.

gbguy20
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#10

Certainly the stats are also skewed by games that were relatively far apart at the start of the 4th as well. It's 2 or more points behind. How many of those are 10 plus points?

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (2h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (4h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (14h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (14h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (14h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (14h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (14h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (18h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (18h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (18h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (20h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (21h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (21h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (21h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (21h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (21h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (21h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (21h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (22h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (22h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (22h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (22h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (22h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS