wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
6 years ago

Green Bay has piled up roughing-the-passer penalties at an alarming rate through two games, leading to some frustration on how to handle QBs.

Continue Reading @ ESPN 

ESPN wrote:



The more the NFL tries to tweak the rules the worse it becomes.

Why not have an official in NYC review and over turn poor penalties? The rest of the replay challenge is "they want to get the call right." Refs make bad calls on penalties just as often. Let's get them right too.
Teams are so close in ability it only takes 1 or 2 wrong calls by officials to turn a game.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
6 years ago
The rules are as vague as possible, because organized crime wants to manipulate the outcome of games. Like they did to us this weekend.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Porforis
6 years ago

The rules are as vague as possible, because organized crime wants to manipulate the outcome of games. Like they did to us this weekend.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



I would be extremely impressed if organized crime could manipulate games to the point of producing a tie.
nerdmann
6 years ago

I would be extremely impressed if organized crime could manipulate games to the point of producing a tie.

Originally Posted by: Porforis 



Seemed to me they didn't want a tie.

Also seemed tone that we were supposed to win the 2014 NFCCG, but not beat the spread. Then again, wtf do I know?
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Zero2Cool
6 years ago

I would be extremely impressed if organized crime could manipulate games to the point of producing a tie.

Originally Posted by: Porforis 



I wouldn't spend much thought on it because it's almost impossible. It's just common sense to see this isn't the case. nerdmann is just pissed off at DirecTV and instead of flinging garbage comments into chat, he is riling up the organized crime folks. 🙂


Speaking of which, big props to nerdmann this past gameday chat. The only bitch I have was the constant faulting of Ha Ha Clinton-Dix. It might have been just one person, or a few.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
6 years ago
It’s ridiculous.
They said Matthews lifted and drive Cousins into the ground.
Looking at it over and over, he not only didn’t lift him, he made sure to not land with his weight on him, and put his left hand on the ground to make sure he didn’t put his weight on Cousins when they hit the ground.
If they are going to do that, then they should put flags on the QB and when you pull one off, he’s down.
If a ref can’t tell the difference between roughing and just a tackle, they shouldn’t be on the field.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
6 years ago

Why not have an official in NYC review and over turn poor penalties?

Originally Posted by: wpr 



According to Tony Corrente, the penalty was called because the official saw Clay Matthews pick the quarterback off his feet. Leaving aside the question of whether that should be against the rules (personally, I don't think so, but that's beside the point), the video evidence showed conclusively that Matthews never did any such thing. If the league is going to stem the rising tide of fan disenchantment, they're going to have to implement some mechanism for overturning obviously erroneous judgment calls in a manner that doesn't cost teams for availing themselves of it. Your idea seems as good as any. It should be available for any penalty that results in change of possession or automatic first down. Ideally, it would be available for any fifteen-yard penalty or spot foul, but I think my suggestion would be a good first step.

Another idea I've toyed with is requiring a plurality or majority of officials to see an infraction and toss their flags for a penalty to be assessed. Just as the homeplate umpire can defer to the third-base umpire, I think football officials should have to concur in judgment too. If an infraction is so subtle that only one official sees it, it's probably not worth calling. I know that goes against the traditional notion of specialized officiating roles, but I'm comfortable with that. Punish the lawless but let the players play.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
6 years ago

It’s ridiculous.
They said Matthews lifted and drive Cousins into the ground.
Looking at it over and over, he not only didn’t lift him, he made sure to not land with his weight on him, and put his left hand on the ground to make sure he didn’t put his weight on Cousins when they hit the ground.
If they are going to do that, then they should put flags on the QB and when you pull one off, he’s down.
If a ref can’t tell the difference between roughing and just a tackle, they shouldn’t be on the field.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 




The Kendricks play I thought he torqued his body to drive Rodgers into the ground. However, if no flag was called, I would have been OK with no flag.


The Clay play. Kirk is off his field prior to Clay making contact as he was heaving the ball down field. Maybe Kirk's left toe is still on the ground, but his momentum is what brought him off his feet, not Clay picking him up or "burping" him.

UserPostedImage
sschind
6 years ago

The Kendricks play I thought he torqued his body to drive Rodgers into the ground. However, if no flag was called, I would have been OK with no flag.



The Clay play. Kirk is off his field prior to Clay making contact as he was heaving the ball down field. Maybe Kirk's left toe is still on the ground, but his momentum is what brought him off his feet, not Clay picking him up or "burping" him.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 




thanks zero, this is the first I saw the Kendricks hit. Neither one of them should have been flagged. Two pretty darn good tackles if you ask me.

wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
6 years ago

According to Tony Corrente, the penalty was called because the official saw Clay Matthews pick the quarterback off his feet. Leaving aside the question of whether that should be against the rules (personally, I don't think so, but that's beside the point), the video evidence showed conclusively that Matthews never did any such thing. If the league is going to stem the rising tide of fan disenchantment, they're going to have to implement some mechanism for overturning obviously erroneous judgment calls in a manner that doesn't cost teams for availing themselves of it. Your idea seems as good as any. It should be available for any penalty that results in change of possession or automatic first down. Ideally, it would be available for any fifteen-yard penalty or spot foul, but I think my suggestion would be a good first step.

Another idea I've toyed with is requiring a plurality or majority of officials to see an infraction and toss their flags for a penalty to be assessed. Just as the homeplate umpire can defer to the third-base umpire, I think football officials should have to concur in judgment too. If an infraction is so subtle that only one official sees it, it's probably not worth calling. I know that goes against the traditional notion of specialized officiating roles, but I'm comfortable with that. Punish the lawless but let the players play.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



I actually considered having the need for an on-field consensus of refs to call a penalty. There are a few problems.
1. It can slow the play down even more as the refs run into a huddle to see if play X did something to player Y.
2. Loyalty. These guys work together a lot of games. Some of them do DI college games too. Too often one ref will kowtow to another for the sake of "Their Team".
3. SOmetimes the backside offical can't see the infraction. For example the receiver/defender are looking back to the LOS and the defender grabs the receivers face mask for an instant. The official between the line and receivers can see this but the ref behind them may not. It's a large area. 22 men all running hard (in theory) Big bodies with lots of padding/protection. Expecting 2 or more refs to see the exact same thing isn't possible. That's why having someone who is removed from the equation, who doesn't have to eat dinner with the other refs and who has the luxury of multiple camera angles seems like the best solution.

Having one or 2 officials in NYC review infractions also leads to more uniformity of the rules.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (6h) : Report: Aaron Rodgers wants to play in 2025, but not for the Jets
beast (8h) : That's what I told the Police officer about my speed when he pulled me over
packerfanoutwest (14h) : NFL told Bears that Packers’ blocked field goal was legal
packerfanoutwest (22-Nov) : 49ers are underdogs at Packers, ending streak of 36 straight games as favorites
Zero2Cool (22-Nov) : 49ers might be down their QB, DL, TE and LT?
packerfanoutwest (22-Nov) : Jaire Alexander says he has a torn PCL
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : Even with the context it's ... what?
Mucky Tundra (20-Nov) : Matt LaFleur without context: “I don’t wanna pat you on the butt and you poop in my hand.”
beast (20-Nov) : We brought in a former Packers OL coach to help evaluate OL as a scout
beast (20-Nov) : Jets have been pretty good at picking DL
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : He landed good players thanks to high draft slot. He isn't good.
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : He can shove his knowledge up his ass. He knows nothing.
beast (20-Nov) : More knowledge, just like bring in the Jets head coach
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : What? Why? Huh?
beast (19-Nov) : I wonder if the Packers might to try to bring Douglas in through Milt Hendrickson/Ravens connections
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : The Jets fired Joe Douglas, per sources
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : Jets are a mess......
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Pretty sure Jets fired their scouting staff and just pluck former Packers.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Jets sign Anders Carlson to their 53.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : When you cycle the weeks, the total over remains for season. But you get your W/L for that selected week. Confusing.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the total and percentage are the same as the previous weeks
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the total and percentage are the same as the previous weeks
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the totals are accurate..nrvrtmind
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : I don't follow what you are saying. The totals are not the same as last week.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : ok so then wht are the totals the same as last week?
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : NFL Pick'em is auto updated when NFL Scores tab is clicked
Martha Careful (19-Nov) : The offense was OK. Let's not forget the Bear defense is very very good.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : Who updates the leaderboard on NFLPickem?
beast (19-Nov) : Has the Packers offense been worse since the former Jets coach joined the Packers?
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Offense gets his ass in gear, this could be good.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Backup QB helped with three wins. Special Teams contributed to three wins.
bboystyle (18-Nov) : Lions played outside thats why. They scored 16 and 17 in the only 2 outside games this year
Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : The rest of the NFL is catching up to Packers ... kicking is an issue throughout league
packerfanoutwest (18-Nov) : Packers DL Kenny Clark: We knew 'we were going to block' Bears' game-winning field goal attempt
Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : Lions seem to be throttling everyone, but only (only) got 24 lol maybe the rain is why
Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : Packers vs Lions game doesn't seem so bad.
beast (18-Nov) : Dennis Green "They are what we thought they were, and we let them off the hook!"
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : comment of the day Z2Cool "Bears better than we want to admit. Packers worse than we think. It's facts."
Mucky Tundra (17-Nov) : my worst case scenario: Bears fix their oline and get a coach like Johnson from the Lions and his scheme
Zero2Cool (17-Nov) : Bears get OL fixed amd we might have a problem
buckeyepackfan (17-Nov) : Pretty sure they already have scouting reports on guys who aren't even starting for their college team. The future is now for me.
buckeyepackfan (17-Nov) : I tend to let Gute and Co. Worry about the future.
beast (17-Nov) : That's great news and Packers need to keep upgrading their OL, DL and DBs this off-season, so missing one guy doesn't kill them
beast (17-Nov) : That's great news and Packers need to keep upgrading their OL, DL and DBs this off-season, so missing one guy doesn't kill them
buckeyepackfan (17-Nov) : Jaire and Evans Williams are both ACTIVE! Good news.
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : The badgers really need to change the whole offensive scheme. No draws no screens plus the quarterback is marginal
Cheesey (17-Nov) : If the Badgers had a decent QB, they would have won. The guy can't hit a wide open receiver
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : chop block
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : there was a very questionable job Block call that upon viewing replay was very borderline
beast (17-Nov) : How so? (I didn't watch)
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

19-Nov / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.