I expect context in your posts from now on.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

You can't stop everything... Capers just has to take the limited talent he has healthy and pick his poison...

He choose to try not to let the talented WR beat them deep, which opens up stuff underneath... congrats, Bucs took advantage of it. Packers defense gave up 20 points, but they also got 7, so a net of 13 points. That's not bad.

What's kind of scary is that that on the Packers touchdown drives, the WRs did NOT touch the ball even once... in fact only two passes were attempted, and the only one completed with to the RB.

It'll be interesting to see how Hundley does in Cleveland... if he does well in two road games, then maybe he just can't pass in Lambeau for some reason.

Originally Posted by: beast 

He calls it context when his favors his opinions and demands it, then it doesn't favor his opinion, he calls them excuses and homerism, wearing green and gold glasses... but really it's the same thing...

Originally Posted by: beast 

Had I not read the Vegas tweet, I would've used the context to say how remarkable it was to even hang with the Steelers. However, that tweet provided potential context to change things and I did so.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 

Eh, in the 3rd quarter the offense started with a 3 and out straight out of the half which didn't really hurt the defense because they hadn't been on the field since before the halftime break. Then the D gave up a 6 minute drive before the offense had one 3 and out then the defense gave up another 6 minute drive. That's 12 minutes TOP given up in 2 possessions, you can't blame the offense for that. The defense simply don't do a good enough job getting off the field regardless of what the offense does, they really don't deserve excuses.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 

Ain't BS. EVERYONE was praying our D didn't have to take the field in OT. BS to say otherwise. I was worried after we won the toss that they'd only need a Figgy to win.

The toss win won the game stopping our sieve from losing the game. If our D had a record, it'd be 3-13.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 

I expect context in your posts from now on.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

SO you're actually rooting for the Packers to win now? ... that's a first, as you admitted to rooting for the other teams in the past trying to get a change in management.

You demanded context early when it fit your agenda, now you're rejecting it when it goes against your agenda.

The defense gave up a first scripted touchdown drive (like the always do)... but after that, they only gave up points after multiple failed Packers offensive drives that were keeping them on the field all damn game.

The Bucs 2nd quarter FG was after 3 Packers drives where they had 6 plays or less and after Lowry's return for a touchdown. The Bucs 2nd half points were during/after 3 Packers drives where they had 4 plays or less. The Bucs points came directly after the Packers offense screwed up on multiple (normally 3 straight) drives keeping the Packers defense on the damn field.

With the exception of the first drive, and after the 3 consecutive failed offensive drives of 6 plays or less, the defense played well... this game, there is a direct correlation to the failure of the offense. AND YET THE DEFENSE IS GETTING MORE OF THE BLAME!


Defense deserves a lot of the blame most games, but they sure don't blame all the blame, especially when they were CLEARLY the best unit on the field... with the exception of that first drive, the defense held up whenever the offense could not completely fail on multiple drives of quick 6 plays and out.

Originally Posted by: beast