Ain't BS. EVERYONE was praying our D didn't have to take the field in OT. BS to say otherwise. I was worried after we won the toss that they'd only need a Figgy to win.
The toss win won the game stopping our sieve from losing the game. If our D had a record, it'd be 3-13.
Originally Posted by: uffda udfa
SO you're actually rooting for the Packers to win now? ... that's a first, as you admitted to rooting for the other teams in the past trying to get a change in management.
You demanded context early when it fit your agenda, now you're rejecting it when it goes against your agenda.
The defense gave up a first scripted touchdown drive (like the always do)... but after that, they only gave up points after multiple failed Packers offensive drives that were keeping them on the field all damn game.
The Bucs 2nd quarter FG was after 3 Packers drives where they had 6 plays or less and after Lowry's return for a touchdown. The Bucs 2nd half points were during/after 3 Packers drives where they had 4 plays or less.
The Bucs points came directly after the Packers offense screwed up on multiple (normally 3 straight) drives keeping the Packers defense on the damn field. With the exception of the first drive, and after the 3 consecutive failed offensive drives of 6 plays or less, the defense played well...
this game, there is a direct correlation to the failure of the offense. AND YET THE DEFENSE IS GETTING MORE OF THE BLAME!
Defense deserves a lot of the blame most games, but they sure don't blame all the blame, especially when they were CLEARLY the best unit on the field... with the exception of that first drive, the defense held up whenever the offense could not completely fail on multiple drives of quick 6 plays and out.