House or Hyde · PACKERSHOME

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

8 years ago

If you could choose between Davon House or Micah Hyde, same salary, who do you choose and why?

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

steveishere
Veteran Member

8 years ago

House. We have guys who can do what Hyde does well like Burnett, Bryce and Rollins may get there if he's healthy. We don't have enough players who can line up and run with big/fast WR on the boundary. With House on the roster we only need 1 guy to develop on the boundary between Randall/Gunter (as the roster stands atm). With Hyde on the roster we'd still need both of those guys to step up outside.

shield4life
Veteran Member

8 years ago

House is just slighly a notch better then Hyde. As much as Hyde has done good plays in some plays his been as bad or worst.

Glad To Be A Packers Fan.

gbguy20
Veteran Member

8 years ago

The only thing Hyde did well was ALLOW completions.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

DarkaneRules
Veteran Member

8 years ago

I can envision a time where D-Ran floats around the backfield a little more on certain packages too. This may open things up for other guys.

Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance

sschind
Senior Member

8 years ago

I'd say House because he is a better position player. Where Hyde had him beat was with his versatility in the secondary and his ST ability. All in all though I'd rather have the better position player especially if he is going to see a lot of playing time.

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

8 years ago

Pretty tough call. It depends on what you need as they are not the same player. House is a CB, Hyde is a Safety. All else being equal I would be willing to Pay more for Hyde for his versatility. While our top end talent is better at S, we have more depth at CB.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

dhazer
Veteran Member

8 years ago

Am i missing something? House was a backup when he was here and most people were happier than shit when he was gone just like Hayward.How can you even compare the 2? House was benched on a team like Jacksonville and Hyde was asked to play outside corner, slot corner, safety and some linebacker. Oh and he was also put on punt returns when they wanted security. He might start here just because our secondary sucks so bad. I also saw someone mention about letting Randall float around and it would free up guys, but I have to ask? Didn't he free up enough receivers against the Falcons. He is lost he has no confidence and plays 15 yards off the ball. But then again thats what you get when have safeties play cornerback.

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

gbguy20
Veteran Member

8 years ago

House didn't get benched, he was replaced as a starter. Not the same thing. He was a depth piece last year just like he was here. I don't think he was resigned to be a starter here either. The difference between Hyde as a depth piece vs house as a depth piece is house can actually cover a receiver. Something Hyde couldn't do no matter what position he was asked to play. What good is versatility if you are worthless in all positions? How are you even considered versatile at that point?

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

steveishere
Veteran Member

8 years ago

#10

Originally Posted by: dhazer

Hyde was a back up here his whole career too and he's always been bad in man coverage which is why he got moved to safety (he never really impressed that much as a Safety either). If he was bigger he'd make a good linebacker but he's the size of a CB without the ability to run with WRs. A good effort guy and smart but House at least has 1 good season of starting under his belt and can hold up in man coverage. Hyde might be worth the contract he got as a safety if he excels in a new scheme but he doesn't really have the skillset to be a 6m/year CB.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

wpr (2h) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (2h) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (4h) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (5h) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.

Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb

wpr (9-Apr) : yay

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24