I'm trying to figure out why people on here are saying Cassell is over rated? He put up good stats and did finish with a 11-5 record. I saw one person say look at the weapons he had, well what were they Moss and Welker and had no running game.

If you are saying Cassell is over rated then that means Rodgers is over rated he had Driver,Jennings and a running game.


Also had 2 game winning drives :pottytrain2:

"dhazer" wrote:

Hazer,

You have to understand, because the Pats RBs played better than Ryan Grant this past season. They used many guys because of injuries. And they all played well, because of the o-line. So Matt Cassell had a killer o-line, a better run game than us, and IMO, better 2 WR set than us. Add a good D to help him win games, and he still doesn't make the playoffs.

Brady had 50 TDs and 8 INTs with those weapons. Cassell got 21 TDs and 11 INTs. I know Tom Brady is Tom Brady, but Tom Brady's numbers were much more reasonable the seasons he didn't have Randy Moss and Wes Welker. The best year he had before the aforementioned players, he had 28 TDs and 14 INTs, one INT more than A-Rod had last year. I know Tom Brady was still way better than A-Rod, in the sense of leading the team, and game winning drives.

Now, Cassel is expected to lead a much an offense with not nearly as good weapons without trouble... that's overrated to me.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:

Krazy what are you talking about? They had to use 5 different rbs
Wrs Pats
Wes Welker 111 1165 10.5 64 3
Randy Moss 69 1008 14.6 76 11
Kevin Faulk 58 486 8.4 22 3
Jabar Gaffney 38 468 12.3 37 2



Packers top 4 receivers

Player Rec Yds Yds/Rec Long TD
Greg Jennings 80 1292 16.2 63 9
Donald Driver 74 1012 13.7 71 5
Donald Lee 39 303 7.8 26 5
Jordy Nelson 33 366 11.1 29 2


I think i would take the Packers players over the Pats

"dhazer" wrote: